NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman'

You can use to get even better search results
February 07, 2006 | Law.com

D.C. Firms View China With Caution

Dozens of U.S. firms have swept into the Chinese market in recent years -- 39 of the largest 250 U.S. firms have offices in Shanghai, Beijing or Hong Kong. But Washington, D.C., firms have been late to the game, with some justification. Most of the law firm money to be made stems from burgeoning corporate activity -- foreign investment, IPOs and mergers and acquisitions -- which is largely the province of big firms in New York and L.A. Still, China won't be ignored -- there's just too much money at stake.
10 minute read
May 01, 2009 | The American Lawyer

Big Suits

USA/UBS; Citibank Shareholder Derivative Litigation; Congoleum Chapter 11 Bankruptcy; FTC vs. Whole Foods; Parmalat Securities Litigation; SEC v. Automated Trading Desk Specialist, et al.
17 minute read
In re: China Valves Technology Securities Litigation, 11 Civ. 0796 (LAK)
Publication Date: 2012-09-21
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Lead Plaintiff Bristol Investment Fund, Ltd.: William Bernard Federman, Federman & Sherwood Byron T. Ball The Ball Law Firm, LLP.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant China Valves Technology, Inc. and Individual Defendants: Alfred Robert Pietrzak, Joel M. Mitnick, Thomas Andrew Paskowitz, Daniel Allan McLaughlin, Sidley Austin LLP Attorneys for Defendant Moore Stephens Wurth Frazer and Torbet, LLP: Lawrence Allen Steckman, John Sandercock, Lester, Schwab, Katz and Dwyer LLP.
Case number: 11 Civ. 0796 (LAK)

Cite as: In re: China Valves Technology Securities Litigation, 11 Civ. 0796 (LAK), NYLJ 1202572273720, at *1 (SDNY, Decided September 12, 2012)District Ju

February 07, 2006 | National Law Journal

D.C. Firms View China With Caution

Dozens of U.S. firms have swept into the Chinese market in recent years -- 39 of the largest 250 U.S. firms have offices in Shanghai, Beijing or Hong Kong. But Washington, D.C., firms have been late to the game, with some justification. Most of the law firm money to be made stems from burgeoning corporate activity -- foreign investment, IPOs and mergers and acquisitions -- which is largely the province of big firms in New York and L.A. Still, China won't be ignored -- there's just too much money at stake.
10 minute read
March 31, 2010 | Corporate Counsel

The Clock Is Ticking on E-Discovery and Evidence Retention

Pension Committee ruling raises the e-discovery bar for in-house counsel — and ups the risk of new penalties and sanctions for (gulp!) 'gross negligence.'
7 minute read
Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc., 10-3270-cv
Publication Date: 2012-04-10
Practice Area: Internet Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Cabranes and Livingston, C.JJ.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10-3270-cv

Cite as: Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc., 10-3270-cv, NYLJ 1202548443347, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided April 5, 2012)Before: Cabranes and Livingsto

June 30, 2004 | Law.com

The Am Law 100: Compensation All Partners

22 minute read
September 07, 2007 | Law.com

Desperately Seeking Seniors

No longer is the 60-plus set just taking a pension and slinking off into the sunset. Lawyers are living longer and healthier, and many want to stay professionally active well into their 70s. Law firms are split regarding enforcing mandatory retirement policies. Economics are driving the split, since younger attorneys want to make more money, be the primary client contact or be lead trial counsel. But kicking out profitable partners is "just lunacy," says Cadwalader Chairman Robert Link Jr.
7 minute read
April 01, 2010 | Legaltech News

'Pension Committee': Read It or Weep

Judge Sheindlin's Pension Committee opinion is a must-read for litigators, particularly for in-house counsel, as many of the litigation-related obligations it imposes arise prior to the retention of outside counsel and penalties for noncompliance could be particularly harsh.
7 minute read
The Bank of New York v River Terrace Associates, LLC
Publication Date: 2005-11-29
Practice Area: Commercial Law | Contracts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 1st Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

By Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Gonzalez, Sweeny, JJ. 6809. The Bank of New York, Plaintiff-Appellant-res, v. River Terrace Associates, LLC, Defendant-res-ap,

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates

    Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®

    Download Now

  • AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage

    Brought to you by Ontra

    Download Now

  • Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2025 State Legislative Sessions

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now