NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Bond Schoeneck King''

You can use to get even better search results
Baptist Health Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Ruth Baxter
Publication Date: 2016-06-09
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Rose, Lynch and Aarons, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 521981

Bond Schoeneck & King PLLC, Albany (Christopher J. Stevens of counsel), for appellant.The Baynes Law Firm, PLLC, Ravena (Brendan F. Baynes of counsel), for respondent.Appeal

May 23, 2016 |

The Am Law Second Hundred: Taking a Dive

Overall, the firms in the bottom half of the Am Law 200 had a rougher year than their richer counterparts.
88 minute read
May 23, 2016 |

Firms Ranked by Gross Revenue

Gross Revenue for the Second Hundred decreased in 2015 by an average of 3.2 percent, reversing a 2.1 percent increase in 2014. The Second Hundred's fall in average gross revenue widens the gap between it and The Am Law 100, which showed a 2.7 percent increase in average gross revenue in 2015.
10 minute read
May 13, 2016 |

Understanding the Cost of Proposed Overtime Regulations

John Ho discusses the update to the Fair Labor Standards Act overtime regulations and practical and operational concerns for employers who may need to reclassify a position as non-exempt.
22 minute read
May 09, 2016 |

Law Firm Management

In this Special Report from the New York Law Journal, brought to you compliments of Berdon LLP: "Capital Market, Corporate Practices Dip in Early 2016," "Propping up an Associate Who Has Dropped the Ball," "The Full-Service Client Partnership Model: A Primer for Law Firms," "You Can Do It All" and "'Relationship Between Leadership and Management in Law Firms."
2 minute read
May 09, 2016 |

You Can Do It All

Edward Hourihan, a managing member of Bond, Schoeneck & King, writes: It is a new marketplace with new rules, and law firms reluctant to change and adapt will compromise their opportunity and success. After compensation and opportunity for advancement, office culture is the next most important consideration for law firm recruits, and for many in these new times, it's the most important.
10 minute read
May 02, 2016 |

Cybersecurity Insurance: Facing Hidden Risks and Uncertainty

Clifford G. Tsan and Michael D. Billok write: Due to the rapid evolution of cyber-attacks, cyber insurance underwriters, brokers, and consumers have struggled with configuring the optimal insurance product to manage an entity's unique risks. This has led to fluctuating policy coverages and configurations.
7 minute read
In The Matter Of John T. Smoke v. Planning Board Of Town Of Greig
Publication Date: 2016-04-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT
Judge: Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Curran, And Troutman, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 15-01295

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Utica (Raymond A. Meier Of Counsel), For Petitioners-Plaintiffs-Appellants.Hrabchak & Gebo, P.C., Watertown (Mark G. Gebo Of Counsel), For Respond

Kyntec Corp. v. ITT Enidine, Inc., 14-CV-271
Publication Date: 2016-04-29
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Western District
Judge: Magistrate Judge Leslie Foschio
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Mitchell J. Banas, Jr., Patrick A. Quinlan, of Counsel, Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Buffalo, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendant: Donald W. O'Brien, Jr., of Counsel, Woods Oviatt Gilman LLP, Rochester, NY. Attorneys for Defendant: Bart A. Starr, of Counsel, Polsinelli PC, Denver, Colorado.
Case number: 14-CV-271

Cite as: Kyntec Corp. v. ITT E , Inc., 14-CV-271, NYLJ 1202756183710, at *1 (WDNY, Decided April 21, 2016) CASENAME Kyntec Corporation, Plaintiff v. ITT E

The Bank Of New York Mellon v. Judith McClintock
Publication Date: 2016-04-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 521494

Rusk Wadlin Heppner & Martuscello, LLP, Kingston (Jason J. Kovacs of counsel), for appellant.Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC, Syracuse (Suzanne M. Messer of counsel), for respo

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now