Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Freeman Mathis Gary'

You can use to get even better search results
Soundara v. AMB Sports & Entertainment, et al.
Publication Date: 2024-04-09
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry: Entertainment and Leisure
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Hodges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Alexandria Seay, Rishi Pattni, (Bird Law Group), Atlanta, T. Bell, (Bell Injury Law, LLC), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Ronald Gaither, Mitchell Robinson, Jarvarus Gresham, (BakerHostetler LLP), Atlanta, for appellee; Joseph Rahimi, John Hubert, (Rahimi, Hughes & Padgett, LLC), Savannah, Marc Bardack, (Freeman, Mathis & Gary, LLP), Atlanta, Carlos Fernandez, (Meriwether & Tharp LLC), Atlanta, for Other party.
Case number: A23A1449

Court affirms summary judgment for a stadium and security in an injury case involving a brawl, but reverses summary judgment for defendants as to injured victims assault and battery claims

April 04, 2024 | Daily Report Online

'They Left Her Out in the Cold': At-Fault Driver Responsible for $8.5M Judgment to Pursue Claims Against Insurer

"I think that she should definitely be able to recover more than the amount of the judgment," said attorney Buck Rogers.
6 minute read
March 18, 2024 | Law.com

How I Made Partner: 'Each Attorney Must Take Ownership of Their Own Career,' Says Jared Hodges of Knowles Gallant Timmons

"An associate with aspirations for partnership should begin by building good habits."
8 minute read
March 08, 2024 | Daily Report Online

Ga. Appeals Court Rules Stadium Can't Be Sued, but Lawsuit Over Brawl at Venue May Proceed

The court said the doctrine of assumption of the risk did not eliminate liability on the part of individual defendants allegedly involved in a fight.
5 minute read
February 26, 2024 | Daily Report Online

How Plaintiff's Attorneys Secured a $10M Settlement in DeKalb County Auto Tort

Raising the stakes, counsel for the excess insurance carrier was hired to sit on the trial where tensions were running high.
4 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Connecticut Appellate Practice & Procedure, 8th Edition Authors: HON. ELIOT D. PRESCOTT, JULIE A. LAVOIE View this Book

View more book results for the query "Freeman Mathis Gary"

February 20, 2024 | Law.com

Insurer's Prejudgment Interest Calculated by Payment Due Date, Not Original Denial of Claim

In part, Meridian argued that the Batstones miscalculated the prejudgment interest by calculating them from the date of the defendants' original denial. The judge agreed.
4 minute read
Modi v. India-American Cultural Association
Publication Date: 2024-02-14
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Non-Profit
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Brown
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Girish Modi, Decatur, for appellant.
For defendant: Leo Kogan, (Freeman Mathis & Gary), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A23A1569

Court affirms liability for an attorney fee award in a case involving violations of an organization's bylaws, but remands for specific assessment of fees in relation to sanctionable conduct

Collington v. Clayton County, et al.
Publication Date: 2024-02-06
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Justice LaGrua
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John David Hadden, Darren Wade Penn, (Penn Law LLC), Atlanta, Benjamin Frederick Windham, (Ben F. Windham, P.C.), Locust Grove, Robert Walker Garrett, (Morgan & Morgan Atlanta, PLLC), Columbus, for appellant.
For defendant: Jack R. Hancock, Arash Ali Sabzevari, Wes C. Jackson, Jacob Edward Daly, (Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP), Atlanta, for appellee; Charles Madden Cork, III, (LAW OFFICES OF CHARLES M. Cork, III), Decatur, for Amicus Appellant; Kellye C. Moore, (Walker Hulbert Gray & Moore, LLP), Perry, for Amicus Appellee; Daniel C. Prout, Jr., (Waldon Adelman Castilla McNamara & Prout), Atlanta, for Other Party.
Case number: S22G1146

Court verifies that OCGA § 36-11-1 applies to official-capacity claims against county sheriffs, and rules that presenting the claim to a county governing authority satisfies the presentment requirement

January 18, 2024 | Daily Report Online

County or Sheriff? Georgia Supreme Court Ruling Provides Clarity in Presentment Dispute

"[B]ringing claims against the appropriate government officials in their official capacities was a recognized way to proceed against a governmental entity—be it the State or one of its counties," read the high court opinion.
7 minute read
January 17, 2024 | Daily Report Online

A 2023 Georgia High Court Ruling Is Now Playing Out in Plaintiffs' Favor

The Supreme Court of Georgia ruling that clarified that 'use' of a motor vehicle 'is not limited by statute terms 'actively in use' 'as a vehicle' is impacting subsequent sovereign immunity challenges involving law enforcement.
5 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

NEXT