NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Ifrah, PLLC'

You can use to get even better search results
The Trustees of the Freeholders and Commonalty of the Town of East Hampton, Plaintiff-Petitioner v. Mollie Zweig, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of East Hampton, the Village of East Hampton, and the Department of Code Enforcement of the Village of East Hampton Defendants-Respondents, 13-29760
Publication Date: 2014-11-13
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Suffolk County, I.A.S. Part 50
Judge: Justice Andrew Tarantino
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Petitioner: Eagan & Matthews, PLLC, East Hampton, NY.
For defendant: Attorney for Respondent Zweig: Esseks, Hefter & Angel, LLP, Riverhead, NY. John C. Jilnicki, Town Attorney, Town of East Hampton, East Hampton, NY.
Case number: 13-29760

Cite as: Trustees East Hampton v. Zweig, 13-29760, NYLJ 1202676077950, at *1 (Sup., SUF, Decided November 3, 2014) 13-29760 Justice Andrew Tar

Beekman Delameter Properties LLC, Petitioner v. Village of Rhinebeck Zoning Board of Appeals, Village of Rhinebeck Planning Board, Rhinebeck Village Place, LLC, and Mirbeau of Rhinebeck, LLC, Respondents, 7402/13
Publication Date: 2014-09-30
Practice Area: Land Use and Planning
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, Dutchess County
Judge: Justice James D. Pagones
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Petitioner: Richard I. Cantor, Esq. Teahan & Constantino, LLP, Poughkeepsie, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys for Respondents: Richard J. Olson, Esq., McCabe & Mack, LLP, Village of Rhinebeck Zoning Board of Appeals and Village of Rhinebeck Planning Board, Poughkeepsie, NY. Attorneys for Respondents: John R. Marvin, Esq., Marvin and Marvin, PLLC, Rhinebeck Village Place, LLC and Mirbeau of Rhinebeck, LLC, Rhinebeck, NY.
Case number: 7402/13

Cite as: Beekman Delameter Properties LLC v. Village of Rhinebeck Zoning Board of Appeals, 7402/13, NYLJ 1202671628477, at *1 (Sup., DU, Decided September 5, 2014) 740

March 18, 2014 | National Law Journal

Judge Guts Class Action Over Online Poker Losses

A federal judge has dealt a blow to an Illinois woman's putative class-action quest to recover online poker gambling losses as state law permits.
2 minute read
February 25, 2013 | Corporate Counsel

Prepare for the coming of the privacy police

The FTC steps up enforcement as legislation stalls and consumer concerns multiply
24 minute read
United States, ex rel. Renee Ifrah, Plaintiff v. Community Health Center of Buffalo, Inc., Defendants, 05-CV-237A
Publication Date: 2012-08-08
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Western District
Judge: Magistrate Judge Leslie Foschio
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: A. Jeff Ifrah, David B. Deitch, of Counsel, Ifrah PLLC, Washington, DC. Attorney for Plaintiff: Robert G. Trusiak, Assistant United States Attorney, of Counsel, William J. Hochul, Jr., United States Attorney, Buffalo, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants: Joseph S. Brown, of Counsel, Buffalo, NY.
Case number: 05-CV-237A

Cite as: US ex rel. Ifrah v. Community Health Center of Buffalo, Inc., 05-CV-237A, NYLJ 1202566241509, at *1 (Dist., WD, Decided April 1, 2012)Magistrate

October 13, 2010 | Legaltech News

Commentary: Banned From the Internet

Some courts are too willing to prohibit internet use as a probation requirement. Are such bans narrowly tailored to affect "only such deprivations of liberty" as reasonably necessary to condition the release? Recent cases suggest the answer is no, say attorneys Jeff Ifrah and Steven Eichorn.
4 minute read
Viable Marketing Corporation, Plaintiff v. Intermark Communications, Inc. d/b/a Intermark Media, Inc. and Copeac, Defendants, 09-CV-1500(JS)(WDW)
Publication Date: 2011-08-31
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Joanna Seybert
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Alain Jeff Ifrah, Esq., Ifrah PLLC, Washington, DC.
For defendant: For Defendants: David Scott Greenberg, Esq., Ina B. Scher, Esq., Davis & Gilbert, New York, NY.
Case number: 09-CV-1500(JS)(WDW)

Cite as: Viable Marketing Corp. v. Intermark Communications, Inc., 09-CV-1500(JS)(WDW), NYLJ 1202512829817, at *1 (EDNY, Decided August 25, 2011)District

July 19, 2010 | National Law Journal

Circuits split over securities fraud sentencing

Three circuits apply 'loss causation' analysis from Dura, but 9th Circuit approach results in higher sentences.
8 minute read
October 15, 2010 | The Recorder

Viewpoint: Banned From the Internet

4 minute read
October 11, 2010 | National Law Journal

Banned from the Internet

Prohibiting a defendant on probation from conducting any business online is overly restrictive and not reasonably related to legitimate sentencing goals.
4 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources