NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.c.'

You can use to get even better search results
Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C. v. Rudinski, Orso & Lynch
Publication Date: 2020-04-27
Practice Area: Attorney Compensation
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Judge Stabile
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-0437

Appellant appealed the judgment in favor of appellee in its action for conversion against appellant law firm that subsequently represented individual in lawsuit and dispersed proceeds of settlement to individual and court found appellant's conduct did not deprive appellee of the funds but rather provided individual with the funds he could have used to compensate appellee. Vacated and remanded.

April 08, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

Ouch! Phila. Law Firm Is Out $68,000 After Suing Successor Attorneys

The opinion clarifies that without agreements between initiating and successor firms, law firms disgruntled over fee disputes can only sue the client and not the subsequent law firm on the case.
3 minute read
March 12, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

People in the News—March 12, 2020—Spector Gadon

Spector Gadon Rosen Vinci announced that Matthew R. Shindell joined the firm as a member in the commercial litigation, health care law and litigation, and insurance coverage and casualty litigation groups.
3 minute read
February 27, 2020 | The Legal Intelligencer

'Bitter Feelings': Ugly Dispute Over Sale of Law Practice Ends in $58K Judgment Against Phila. Firm

The court's decision details the anatomy of a failed deal between a Philadelphia law firm experiencing financial difficulties and a solo attorney looking to wind down his own practice.
6 minute read
December 27, 2019 | The Legal Intelligencer

People in the News—Dec. 27, 2019—Duane Morris

As part of Duane Morris' support of City Year, the firm donated 500 copies of "Twelve Angry Men" to Kensington Health Science Academy.
3 minute read
Spector Gadon & Rosen, P.C. v. Rudinski, Orso & Lynch
Publication Date: 2019-09-09
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Legal Services
Court: Courts of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
Judge: Judge Erdos
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 19-1018

Defendant lawyer and his law firm were liable for conversion where they distributed the proceeds of a settlement amount to their client without paying the plaintiff law firm's outstanding balance for work on the settled case, even where defendants did not retain the funds and believed they had done the right thing. The court recommended affirmance.

Cypress v. Wayne
Publication Date: 2018-04-16
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Keyes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 01-16-00929-CV

Cypress Creek, a nonprofit ambulance provider, has a tactical medical team comprised of commissioned peace officers who provide EMS services in situations that would be unsafe for traditional EMTs.

Moore v. Amarillo-Panhandle
Publication Date: 2018-02-19
Practice Area: Attorney Compensation | Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Pirtle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 07-16-00300-CV

Appellant, proceeding pro se, brought suit against appellee and others for trespass and the wrongful taking of livestock allegedly in violation of the Texas Theft Liability Act.

August 21, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

$1M Award Upheld in Dad's RICO Case Against Daughter, Son-in-Law

A federal judge has upheld a $1 million verdict in a civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act case filed by a man who claimed his daughter and son-in-law sabotaged his business by embezzling company funds and diverting them to their own company.
5 minute read
May 04, 2017 | The Legal Intelligencer

Father's RICO Claims Against Daughter, Son-in-Law OK'd

A civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act case filed by a man who claimed his daughter and son-in-law sabotaged his business by embezzling company funds and diverting them to their own business can move forward, a federal judge has ruled.
6 minute read

Resources