NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Bond Schoeneck King''

You can use to get even better search results
August 20, 2015 | Law.com

Judge Sanctions NJ Attorney for Suit Against Fla. Attorney

A trial judge has levied sanctions against a New Jersey attorney who the judge said filed a lawsuit "solely in bad faith, for the purpose of harassment of ... adversarial counsel."
4 minute read
August 17, 2015 |

Technology Finds Its Place in Commercial Division Cases

Many New York courts, particularly in the Commercial Division, are increasingly turning to tech to increase efficiency in complicated and time-consuming cases.
7 minute read
August 14, 2015 | Law.com

Technology Finds Its Place in Commercial Division Cases

Many New York courts, particularly in the Commercial Division, are increasingly turning to tech to increase efficiency in complicated and time-consuming cases.
7 minute read
Ayala v. Looks Great Services, Inc., 14-CV-6035
Publication Date: 2015-08-03
Practice Area: Employment
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Eastern District
Judge: District Judge Arthur Spatt
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for the Plaintiff By: John V. Golaszewski, Esq., of Counsel, Schiller Law Group, P.C., New York, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys for the Defendants By: Mark N. Reinharz, Esq., of Counsel, Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Garden City, N.Y.
Case number: 14-CV-6035

Cite as: Ayala v. Looks Great Services, Inc., 14-CV-6035, NYLJ 1202733598328, at *1 (EDNY, Decided July 23, 2015) CASENAME Renato Ayala, Blas Gutierez, Leonel

In the Matter of the Claim of Ryan S. Plouffe v. Gannett Company Inc.
Publication Date: 2015-07-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 519645

Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Peter A. Jones of counsel) and The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee (L. Michael Zinser admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.James W

In the Matter of the Claim of Andrew C. Stevens v. Gannett Company Inc.
Publication Date: 2015-07-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 519643

Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Peter A. Jones of counsel) and The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee (L. Michael Zinser admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.James W

In the Matter of the Claim of Rhonda M. Lynch v. Gannett Company Inc.
Publication Date: 2015-07-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 519982

Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Peter A. Jones of counsel) and The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee (L. Michael Zinser admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.James W

In the Matter of the Claim of Michelle L. Tompkins v. Gannett Company Inc.
Publication Date: 2015-07-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 519796

Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Peter A. Jones of counsel) and The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee (L. Michael Zinser admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.James W

In the Matter of the Claim of Jason A. Crawford v. Gannett Company Inc.
Publication Date: 2015-07-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 519961

Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Peter A. Jones of counsel) and The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee (L. Michael Zinser admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.James W

In the Matter of the Claim of Christian P. Wiedemann v. Gannett Company Inc.
Publication Date: 2015-07-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch, Devine and Clark, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 519970

Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (Peter A. Jones of counsel) and The Zinser Law Firm, PC, Nashville, Tennessee (L. Michael Zinser admitted pro hac vice), for appellant.James W

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now