NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Cravath Swaine Moore,'

You can use to get even better search results
G. Irvin Terrell of Baker Botts
Publication Date: 2009-04-09
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

G. Irvin Terrell of Baker Botts has learned a few things in his many trips around the block. So last June, when Grupo Mexico SAG suddenly decided not to call its majority shareholder, German Larrea, as a witness in a bench trial on the Mexican mining giant's liability to creditors of a bankrupt subsidiary, Terrell convinced a federal judge in Brownsville, Texas, to compel Larrea to testify. In the end, Terrell won a $6 billion victory for his client, Asarco.

April 23, 2004 | New York Law Journal

Aspiring Filmmakers Take Legal Path to Succeed at Box Office

If you want to be in the movies � a business enterprise short on rules and precedents but wide open to opportunity for those with zealous confidence � it helps to be a lawyer.
7 minute read
Supreme Court's GSK Ruling Sinks Another Sanford Wittels Class Action, but $99 Million Novartis Deal is Safe
Publication Date: 2012-06-26
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Plaintiffs lawyers at Sanford Wittels cemented a $99 million wage-and-hour settlement for Novartis sales representatives on May 31--less than three weeks before the Supreme Court ruled that pharma sales reps aren't entitled to overtime pay. But the high court's decision came out in time to knock out a separate $70 million class action that Sanford Wittels brought against Novo Nordisk.

With Few Good Options After Supreme Court F-Cubed Ruling, Vivendi Plaintiffs Make Highly Creative Argument to Keep Multi-Billion Dollar Verdict Alive
Publication Date: 2010-07-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

You have to give Matthew Gluck of Milberg credit for trying. In the face of what almost everyone thinks is a devastating Supreme Court ruling, Gluck is arguing that because Vivendi's ADRs were backed by common shares, its stock was actually traded on the New York Stock Exchange. One defense lawyer calls that contention "N-U-T-S."

May 13, 2002 | New York Law Journal

New York Is Law Firms

BY MOST measures, these are not the best of times for the New York City economy.
13 minute read
October 09, 2003 | New York Law Journal

Lawyers on Major Transactions

Which firms from the right coast of the Atlantic just lawyered the creation of Europe's new largest airline? Also, check out which hometown firms helped set up the billion dollar sale of an auto leasing company.
3 minute read
Jenner Scores for Chesapeake in Battle with BNY over Early Bond Call
Publication Date: 2013-05-08
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

A federal judge in New York cleared the way for Chesapeake Energy to redeem $1.3 billion in notes, rejecting arguments by BNY's lawyers at Sidley Austin that the company had missed a deadline for the buy-back.

June 15, 2001 | Law.com

The Empire Strikes Back

Lawyers, it is said, are motivated in equal part by fear and greed. When it comes to technology, which devil they listen to may depend on whether they're in London or New York. In London, where large firms have innovative long-range computer projects, they fear competitors' use of technology. So they spend lots of money. In New York, lawyers are focused on profits and less inclined to invest in long-term tech projects.
12 minute read
Second Circuit Revives Online Music Pricing Antitrust Class Action Against Record Companies
Publication Date: 2010-01-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

For the antitrust bar, the ruling is an important clarification of Twombly pleading standards in Sherman Act cases. And for the rest of us, it raises the possibility of cheap music downloads somewhere down the road.

Kaye Scholer Leads Way for Antitrust Win in Battle of Big Drug Stores v. Big Pharma
Publication Date: 2012-08-24
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

A California appellate court found that a group of retail pharmacies failed to show that pharmaceutical companies conspired to charge higher prices on their products in the United States compared to prices they charged in Canada.

Resources

  • 2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates

    Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®

    Download Now

  • AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage

    Brought to you by Ontra

    Download Now

  • Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2025 State Legislative Sessions

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now