NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Yoss'

You can use to get even better search results
Ray v. Hartwell Railroad Co.
Publication Date: 2011-07-08
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hunstein, Carol W.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John C. NeSmith, Danielsville, for appellant.
For defendant: . Allan R. Ramsay McClure, Ramsay, Dickerson & Escoe LLP, Toccoa, and Matthew D. Williams Yoss LLP, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case number: S11A0459

Appeal dismissed as moot because appellants' enumerations of error presented no challenge to the trial court's ruling that, as a matter of law, they could not prove their title to the disputed pro

June 07, 2011 | Law.com

Remnants of Yoss firm face lawsuits

The remnants of the Yoss law firm face legal fallout in Atlanta. The defunct firm's landlord at Two Midtown Plaza is seeking nearly $500,000 in unpaid rent and other costs.
7 minute read
April 21, 2011 | Law.com

Florida Supreme Court suspends Hank Adorno for three years

Florida's high court rejected a recommendation that Henry "Hank" Adorno should receive a public reprimand for his role in a controversial settlement with the city of Miami of a class action lawsuit over fire fees.
4 minute read
March 18, 2011 | Law.com

Five ex-Yoss attorneys forming Fort Lauderdale firm

It's back to the future for a group of Yoss lawyers who merged with the law firm 15 years ago and are regrouping now that Yoss is dissolving. The five lawyers in the Fort Lauderdale satellite office of Yoss LLP will stay in the same office under the new name McIntosh Schwartz.
1 minute read
Campbell v. Altec Indus. Inc.
Publication Date: 2011-02-18
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Hines, P. Harris
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Douglas F. Aholt Chambers, Aholt & Rickard LLP, Jeffrey J. Hayward, and Scott A. Farrow Troutman Sanders LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: . John H. Horne and Marlo O. Leach Adorno & Yoss, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case number: S10Q1379

The statute of repose found in O.C.G.A. § 51-1-11 b 2 begins to run when a finished pr is sold as new to the intended consumer who is to receive the pr

Newell Recycling of Atlanta Inc. v. Jordan Jones and Goulding
Publication Date: 2010-12-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Melton, Harold D.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: H. Fielder Martin, Jason A. Cooper Shapiro, Fussell, Wedge & Martin LLP and Stephen G. Lowe Adorno & Yoss, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Robert O. Fleming Jr., Joseph C. Staak and Kent P. Smith Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: S09G1974

O.C.G.A. § 9-3-24's 6-year statute of limitation was controlling, since the statute on all simple contracts in writing is six

Meadow Springs LLC v. IH Riverdale LLC
Publication Date: 2010-12-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Phipps, Herbert E.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William B. Brown and Jacqueline Marcucci Heyman & Sizemore LLC, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: David L. Pardue Adorno & Yoss LLC and Christopher S. Badeaux Hartman, Simons, Spielman & Wood LLP, Atlanta, for appellees.
Case number: A08A2030

Because appellees' personalty interest did not involve real estate, its lis pendens action against certain property was in

Henderson v. Schklar
Publication Date: 2010-05-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Mikell, Charles B.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Edward C. Henderson Jr. Taylor English Duma LLP, for appellant.
For defendant: . William B. Ney Schklar, Ney & Heim LLC, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A10A0719

The appellants breach the parties' settlement agreement twice when they tendered a dishonored check to a third party and later failed to make a required installment pa

April 30, 2010 | Corporate Counsel

Hertz v. Friend May Add to Overburdened Federal Docket

The decision may also create undue expenses for both parties since federal court is generally more expensive.
1 minute read
April 30, 2010 | Corporate Counsel

Hertz v. Friend: Supreme Court Defines Headquarters as a Corporation's "Nerve Center"

For diversity purposes, the Supreme Court defines a corporation's citizenship by its principal place of business.
7 minute read

Resources