NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Bond Schoeneck King''

You can use to get even better search results
November 14, 2013 |

Employment and ERISA Decisions Address Pleading Pitfalls

In his Northern District Roundup, Clifford G. Tsan, a partner at Bond, Schoeneck & King, reviews two recent decisions, including the dismissal of all claims but one due to a plaintiff's failure to allege the others with sufficient particularity, and the denial of a defendant's motion to dismiss in a case involving an employee benefits plan because the motion was made on preemption grounds and not on the grounds that the plan was not an ERISA plan.
5 minute read
October 30, 2013 |

The Experts

The New York Law Journal thanks our legal columnists who have been contributing to the Law Journal from the 1960s to the present day.
8 minute read
In The Matter Of Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC v. New York Department Of Economic Development, Also Known As Empire State Development, Et Al.
Publication Date: 2013-10-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: P.J., Rose, Lahtinen and Egan Jr., JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 514812

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (J.P. Wright of counsel), for appellant.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Owen W. Demuth of counsel), for respondents.Eg

In The Matter Of Dannible & Mckee, LLP v. New York Department Of Economic Development, Also Known As Empire State Development, Et Al.
Publication Date: 2013-10-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: P.J., Rose, Lahtinen and Egan Jr., JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 514833

Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Syracuse (J.P. Wright of counsel), for appellant.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Owen W. Demuth of counsel), for respondents.Eg

Delaware County v. Leatherstocking Healthcare, LLC
Publication Date: 2013-10-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: J.P., Stein, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 515931

Porter L. Kirkwood, County Attorney, Delhi, for appellant-respo Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Garden City (Justin C. Tan of counsel), for respo appellant and respo

In The Matter Of The Claim Of Patricia Neely v. Pinnacle Lutheran Church
Publication Date: 2013-10-03
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION THIRD DEPARTMENT
Judge: P.J., Stein, Garry and Egan Jr., JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 516233

Patricia Neely, Avon, appellant pro se.Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Rochester (James Holahan of counsel), for Pinnacle Lutheran Church, respondent.Eric T. Schneiderman, Att

July 30, 2013 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Employee Who Was Fired after Taking Computer Cord Home and Using Employer’s Cell Phone for Personal Calls is Denied Unemployment Insurance

A New York court has upheld a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that disqualified a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits…
2 minute read
December 05, 2012 | Inside Counsel

11 noteworthy in-house career moves

Charting the latest GC and in-house appointments
27 minute read
September 12, 2011 |

Bond, Schoeneck & King Picks Ipro eCapture

Ipro Tech, the Arizona-based designer of e-discovery software, announced on Sept. 7 that Bond Schoeneck & King, a law firm with offices in Florida, Kansas, and New York, has selected Ipro eCapture for its in-house e-discovery processing. Ipro said the move by Bond Schoeneck means the firm could avoid outsourcing a portion of its office staff.
2 minute read
Oneida Indian Nation v. Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, 11-3272-cv (Lead)
Publication Date: 2013-01-28
Practice Area: Attorneys Fees
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Judge: Before: Wesley, Chin, C. JJ., Larimer, D.J.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Michael R. Smith, David A. Reiser, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Washington, DC; Arlinda F. Locklear, Washington, DC.
For defendant: For Appellant: Hermes Fernandez, Arthur J. Siegel, Clifford G. Tsan, Bond, Schoeneck & King, PLLC, Albany, NY.
Case number: 11-3272-cv (Lead)

Cite as: Oneida Indian Nation v. Bond Schoeneck & King, PLLC, 11-3272-cv (Lead), NYLJ 1202585424034, at *1 (2d Cir, Decided January 18, 2013)Before: W

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now