NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Brooks Kushman'

You can use to get even better search results
June 07, 2005 |

Patent Dispute Pits Cisco Against StorageTek

Last week StorageTek inked a $4.1 billion deal to be acquired by Sun and on Monday came closing arguments in a patent infringement case against another Silicon Valley giant.
3 minute read
June 08, 2005 |

Patent Dispute Pits Cisco Against StorageTek

During closing arguments on Monday, Storage Technology Corp. asked a San Francisco jury to award it $322.8 million in damages in its suit against Cisco Systems Inc. StorageTek claims that Cisco infringed its patent covering the way networking equipment handles and routes packets of information. Cisco attorney Matthew Powers, a partner at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, argued that StorageTek's patent is invalid and not infringed.
3 minute read
June 08, 2005 |

Patent Dispute Pits Cisco Against StorageTek

During closing arguments on Monday, Storage Technology Corp. asked a San Francisco jury to award it $322.8 million in damages in its suit against Cisco Systems Inc. StorageTek claims that Cisco infringed its patent covering the way networking equipment handles and routes packets of information. Cisco attorney Matthew Powers, a partner at Weil, Gotshal & Manges, argued that StorageTek's patent is invalid and not infringed.
3 minute read
September 01, 2007 |

Editor's Note

2 minute read
October 09, 2001 |

Federal Circuit Vacates Judgment for Internet Security Company

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated a district court's grant of summary judgment of non-infringement for Internet security software and applications company Symantec Corp., saying a fact finder would decide whether Symantec's software intercepts computer viruses before digital data is "stored" on a computer. The court also affirmed that the Cupertino, Calif.-based company did not license the virus detection software patent at issue.
3 minute read
July 18, 2007 |

Courting a Jury

Because patent trials are rare, the few lawyers who have actually tried patent cases in front of juries are in high demand. Special skills are required: While every trial lawyer has to be adept at building rapport with a jury, patent litigators also often face the difficult challenge of making complicated technology understandable to those six or eight ordinary folks.
11 minute read
July 18, 2007 |

Courting a Jury

Because patent trials are rare, the few lawyers who have actually tried patent cases in front of juries are in high demand. Special skills are required: While every trial lawyer has to be adept at building rapport with a jury, patent litigators also often face the difficult challenge of making complicated technology understandable to those six or eight ordinary folks.
11 minute read
July 18, 2007 |

Courting a Jury

Patent trials are rare and the few lawyers who have actually tried patent cases in front of juries are in demand. Special skills are required: patent litigators face the difficult challenge of making complicated technology understandable to those six or eight ordinary folks.
11 minute read
July 20, 2007 |

Making patent cases simple for juries

FOR ALL OF THE HYPE these days over enormous jury verdicts-including the record $1.5 billion judgment against Microsoft Corp. in March-few juries ever decide a patent dispute. The huge stakes and the unpredictability of juries ensure that "most companies choke down some kind of a settlement or licensing deal," says veteran patent litigator Woody Jameson, a partner at Duane Morris in Atlanta.
11 minute read

Resources

  • 2024 Report: State of AI in Legal

    Brought to you by Ironclad

    Download Now

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now