Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Musick Peeler Garrett'

You can use to get even better search results
June 12, 2014 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

Shade Foods, Inc. v. Innovative Products Sales & Marketing, Inc .

 SHADE FOODS, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS SALES & MARKETING, INC., Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; ROYAL…
122 minute read
June 12, 2014 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

RAYCHEM CORPORATIONv. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

 RAYCHEM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.853 F. Supp. 1170UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF…
46 minute read
June 11, 2014 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

NORDSTROM, INC., a Washington Corporation-Appellee, v. CHUBB & SON, INC., a New York corporation dba Chubb or The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies; FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation dba Chubb or The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies-Appellants.

 NORDSTROM, INC., a Washington Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHUBB & SON, INC., a New York corporation dba Chubb or The Chubb Group of Insurance…
33 minute read
June 11, 2014 | Insurance Coverage Law Center

NORDSTROM, INC., a Washington Corporation-Appellee, v. CHUBB & SON, INC., a New York corporation dba Chubb or The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies; FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana corporation dba Chubb or The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies-Appellants.

 NORDSTROM, INC., a Washington Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CHUBB & SON, INC., a New York corporation dba Chubb or The Chubb Group of Insurance…
36 minute read
Paroline v. United States
Publication Date: 2014-04-23
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. 12–8561

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 4268 DOYLE RANDALL PAROLINE PETITIONER v. UNITED STATES ET

United States v. Guillen-Cervantes
Publication Date: 2014-03-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Cindy K. Jorgenson, District Judge, Presiding Before: Susan P. Graber and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges, and Raymond J. Dearie, Senior District Judge.**
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Bruce M. Ferg (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Robert L. Miskell, Appellate Chief; John S. Leonardo, United States Attorney, District of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
For defendant: Joshua F. Hamilton (argued) and Clay Hernandez, Law Offices of Hernandez & Robles, P.C., Tucson, Arizona, for Defendant-Appellant Guillen-Cervantes. Adrian G. Hall, Law Office of Adrian G. Hall, Tucson, Arizona, for Defendant-Appellant Castillo.
Case number: No. 12-10255 No. 12-10279

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 3409 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RUPERTO GUILLE

Gonzalez v. Seal Methods, Inc.
Publication Date: 2014-01-27
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Panish Shea & Boyle, Rahul Ravipudi; Law Offices of John J. Perlstein, John J. Perlstein; The Ehrlich Law Firm and Jeffrey Isaac Ehrlich for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Musick, Peeler & Garrett, William A. Bossen and Cheryl A. Orr for Defendant and Respondent.
Case number: No. B246825

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 893 LUCIA GONZALEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. SEAL METHODS, IN

January 16, 2014 |

After the Fraud on the Market Doctrine: What Should Replace It?

In his Corporate Securities column, John C. Coffee Jr., the Adolf A. Berle Professor of Law at Columbia University Law School and Director of its Center on Corporate Governance, writes about the U.S. Supreme Court's coming decision in 'Halliburton v. Erica P. John Fund', which may overrule the "fraud on the market" doctrine that was announced over a quarter century ago in 'Basic v. Levinson'.
17 minute read
Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC
Publication Date: 2013-12-19
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: The Consumer Law Group, Alan M. Mansfield; Peitzman Weg and Michael A. Bowse for Plaintiffs and Respondents. Seth E. Mermin, Thomas Bennigson and Timothy Sun for Consumer Action, Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety, The Public Health Law Center, Inc., and Public Good Law Center as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Respondents.
For defendant: Morrison & Foerster, Shirley J. Hufstelder and Benjamin J. Fox for Defendant and Appellant Argus Health Systems, Inc. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Gail E. Lees, Christopher Chorba, Blaine H. Evanson; Husch Blackwell, Thomas M. Dee and Christopher A. Smith for Defendant and Appellant Express Scripts, Inc. Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, Thomas M. Peterson, Molly Moriarty Lane and Richard S. Odom for Defendant and Appellant Anthem-Prescription Management, LLC. Steptoe & Johnson, Martin D. Schneiderman and Jason Levin for Defendants and Appellants AdvancePCS, AdvancePCS Health L.P., PharmaCare Management Services, Inc., and TDI Managed Services, Inc. Holland & Knight, Richard T. Williams and Tara L. Cooper for Defendants and Appellants PharmaCare and TDI Managed Services.
Case number: No. S203124

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 13572 JERRY BEEMAN et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. ANTHEM PRE

In re Plant Insulation Co.
Publication Date: 2013-10-28
Practice Area: Bankruptcy
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding Before: John T. Noonan, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert B. Millner, SNR Denton US LLP, Chicago, IL, Andrew T. Frankel, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY, and Clinton E. Cameron, Troutman Sanders LLP, Chicago, IL, argued the cause for Appellants. Joel T. Muchmore, SNR Denton US LLP, San Francisco, CA, and Clinton E. Cameron filed briefs for the Appellants. With them on the briefs were Paul E. Glad, SNR Denton US LLP, San Francisco, CA, Philip A. O'Connell, Jr., SNR Denton US LLP, Boston, MA, Robert B. Millner and Christopher D. Soper, SNR Denton US LLP, Chicago, IL, Andrew T. Frankel and Mark Thompson, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, New York, NY, Deborah L. Stein, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Valerie A. Moore and Eugenie Gifford Baumann, Haight, Brown & Bonesteel LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Randall J. Peters, R. Jeff Carlisle, and David K. Morrison, Lynberg & Watkins P.C., Los Angeles, CA, Michael S. Davis, Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP, New York, NY, Ray L. Wong, Philip R. Matthews and Paul J. Killion, Duane Morris LLP, San Francisco, CA, Lawrence A. Tabb, Musick Peeler & Garrett, Los Angeles, CA, Chad Westfall, Musick, Peeler & Garrett, San Francisco, CA, Clinton E. Cameron and Seth M. Erickson, Troutman Sanders LLP, Chicago, IL.
For defendant: Steven B. Sacks, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued the cause and filed a brief for the Debtor-Appellees. With him on the brief was Michael H. Ahrens, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, San Francisco, CA, Gary S. Fergus, Fergus, A Law Office, San Francisco, CA, James L. Miller, Snyder, Miller & Orton LLP, San Francisco, CA, Peter Van N. Lockwood, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, Washington, DC.
Case number: No. 12-17466 No. 12-17467

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11812 IN RE: PLANT INSULATION CO., Debtor, FIREMAN'S FUND ANCE COMPANY; UNITED STATES FIRE

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT