0 results for 'Butler Snow'
Decided and Entered: March 23, 2006 98996 ________________________________ PAUL SAUNDERS et al., Respondents, v BRYANT'S TOWING et al., Appellants.
Precedent ruled the day at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in a price-fixing case against makers of liquid-crystal display panels, even if not all the judges were particularly happy about it. Who was happy? Lawyers for the LCD makers at White & Case.
Supreme Court Criminal Term, Part 14 Justice Massaro Defendant is charged with Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the Third Degree (Penal Law §265.02[4]), and rel
Practice Makes Perfect: Dallas Judges Discuss Their Preferences When It Comes to Motions
Texas Lawyer gathered four Dallas district court judges to talk about their preferences on how attorneys file motions in their courts; when it's best to file a motion for summary judgment; how to successfully get an emergency motion heard; and what their pet peeves are about lawyers' motion practices.Jury Mulls Punitives Against Merck In Wake of $4.5M Vioxx Verdict
By Lisa Brennan, New Jersey Law JournalThe punitive damages phase of the Atlantic City Vioxx trial continued Friday, two days after jurors found Merck Co. Inc. liable for not properly warning of the dangers its drug posed to patients with heart problems.After a five-week trial and 14 hours of deliberation, the jury awarded $3 million to John McDarby, 77, who suffered a heart attack in 2004 after four years of Vioxx use, and $1.NEW YORK COUNTY Supreme Court Justice Feinman The motion and cross motion are consolida
Punitives Mulled Against Merck After $4.5 Mil. Vioxx Verdict
The punitive damages phase of the Atlantic City Vioxx trial continued Friday, two days after jurors found Merck & Co. Inc. liable for not properly warning of the dangers its drug posed to patients with heart problems.Jury Mulls Punitives Against Merck In Wake of $4.5M Vioxx Verdict
The punitive damages phase of the Atlantic City Vioxx trial continued last Friday, two days after jurors found Merck & Co. liable for not properly warning of the dangers its drug posed to patients with heart problems.[PUBLISH]Before CARNES and PRYOR, Circuit Judges, and DOWD,*fn1 District Judge.Because state supreme courts are the final arbiters of state law, "when we write
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates
Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®
Download Now
AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage
Brought to you by Ontra
Download Now
Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?
Brought to you by AllRize
Download Now
2025 State Legislative Sessions
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now