Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Nichols Kaster'

You can use to get even better search results
Gordon Casey and Duane Skinner, Individually and on Behalf of all others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Citibank, N.A.; Citimortgage, Inc.; Midfirst Bank, N.A., Doing Business as Midland Mortgage; and Firstinsure, Inc., Defendants, 5:12-CV-820
Publication Date: 2013-04-19
Practice Area: Appeals
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
Judge: District Judge David Hurd
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys For Plaintiffs: Donald H. Nichols, Esq., E. Michelle Drake, Esq., Kai H. Richter, Esq., of Counsel, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Minneapolis, M.N. Matthew C. Helland, Esq., of Counsel, San Francisco, C.A. Attorneys For Plaintiffs: Patrick F. Madden, Esq., Sarah R. Schalman — Bergen, Esq., Shanon J. Carson, Esq., of Counsel, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, P.A. Attorneys For Plaintiffs: Brett H. Cebulash, Esq., Kevin Landau, Esq., of Counsel, Taus, Cebulash & Landau, LLP, New York, N.Y.
For defendant: Attorneys For Defendants: Citibank, N.A.; and Citimortgage, Inc., Christopher J. Willis, Esq., Sarah T. Reise, Esq., Stefanie H. Jackman, Esq., of Counsel, Ballard Spahr, LLP, Atlanta, G.A. Attorneys For Defendants: Citibank, N.A.; and Citimortgage, Inc., Mitchell J. Katz, Esq., Teresa M. Bennett, Esq., of Counsel, Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., Syracuse, N.Y. Attorneys For Defendants: Midfirst Bank, N.A. and Firstinsure, Inc., David S. Kantrowitz, Esq., John C. Englander, Esq., Matthew G. Lindenbaum, Esq., of Counsel, Boston, M.A. Attorneys For Defendants: Midfirst Bank, N.A. and Firstinsure, Inc., Edward G. Melvin, Esq., Robert J. Smith, Esq., of Counsel, Syracuse, N.Y.
Case number: 5:12-CV-820

Cite as: Casey v. Citibank, N.A., 5:12-CV-820, NYLJ 1202596364079, at *1 (NDNY, Decided April 10, 2013)District Judge David HurdDec

October 04, 2010 |

Docketwatch: Cases up for argument at the Supreme Court

Our list of cases on the docket at the U.S. Supreme Court during the next two weeks — and the lawyers who will argue them.
6 minute read
March 21, 2011 |

Baristas' suit against Starbucks may proceed as class action

A Boston federal judge has certified a Massachusetts class action against Starbucks Corp. over its tip policy on the same day plaintiffs appealed a New York federal court's judgment on the same policy to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit.
4 minute read
December 07, 2011 |

7th Circuit rules for borrower over BOA in Truth in Lending Act case

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit has revived a borrower's case against Bank of America and a title company for giving him one instead of two copies of a notice advising of a three-day right to cancel a refinancing.
4 minute read
June 10, 2009 |

Lose the 'Pole Tax'

In a wage-and-hour class action, strippers sue to be classified as employees, not independent contractors.
3 minute read
Rafael Febus, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Guardian First Funding Group, LLC, and Jason Levy, and Mark Fidel, individually, Defendants, 10 Civ. 2590
Publication Date: 2012-07-16
Practice Area: Attorneys Fees
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Sidney Stein
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 10 Civ. 2590

Cite as: Febus v. Guardian First Funding Group, LLC, 10 Civ. 2590, NYLJ 1202562762892, at *1 (SDNY, Decided June 21, 2012)District Judge Sidney Stein

October 27, 2008 |

IN-BRIEF

New York Judge William Pauley approved the settlement of an antitrust class action over bar-exam review courses, but has slashed attorney fees in the case. The suit was one of a number of similar actions filed in recent years against BAR/BRI, the nation's dominant purveyor of bar review courses. Plus, more of this week's news briefs.
3 minute read
July 14, 2010 |

In-House Lawyer Loses Whistleblower Case in Minnesota

When Sybaritic general counsel Brian Kidwell pointed out suspected illegal activity, he knew it could come back to bite him. Kidwell hit the books and tried to protect himself — but was still denied whistleblower protection.
8 minute read
October 16, 2009 |

Full 7th Circuit Leaves Verbal Complaints at Employee's Own Risk

The 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday declined to hear a workplace retaliation case en banc, letting stand the panel's decision that the Fair Labor Standards Act doesn't protect "unwritten purely verbal complaints." But three judges dissented. Judges Ilana Rovner, Ann Williams and Diane Wood said their colleagues were wrong not to hear the case because the decision departs from other circuits' decisions and "the long-standing view of the Department of Labor."
2 minute read
March 25, 2010 |

High Court to Decide Whether Anti-Retaliation Shield Protects Only Those Who Complain in Writing

The Supreme Court has agreed to hear a retaliation lawsuit that seeks to answer a seemingly simple question: What does it mean to "file a complaint"? The question lies at the heart of the case of a Wisconsin factory worker who claimed he was unlawfully fired after verbally complaining to his bosses about the placement of time clocks. The employer argued that only written complaints -- not oral ones -- are protected activity under the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the 7th Circuit agreed.
2 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT