NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Shartsis Friese'

You can use to get even better search results
March 17, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

Boutique Raids the Usual BigLaw Firm for Lateral Partner

Shartsis Friese doesn't add laterals very frequently. But when it does, it's often from Morrison & Foerster.
2 minute read
March 15, 2011 | The Recorder

MoFo Real Estate Partner Moves to Shartsis

2 minute read
May 11, 2007 | The Recorder

How Small Firms Are Managing $160,000

Partner Arthur Shartsis says Shartsis Friese's one-to-one partner-to-associate ratio helps cushion the impact of his first years' new $160,000 salaries. A look at how other premium small shops are coping.
6 minute read
January 04, 2010 | Law.com

Shartsis Sues Client, Gets Quick Response

Shartsis Friese had barely filed a complaint to recover more than $11 million in fees from a longtime client for which it had won a $101 million settlement when an e-mail arrived announcing that a check's in the mail. Not for all of the money, mind you -- but about two-thirds of it. "I consider it a nice deposit," Shartis partner Arthur Shartsis said. "We're sort of working our way toward getting paid."
3 minute read
June 09, 2009 | The Recorder

Shartsis Goes to Court

The San Francisco firm's Frank Cialone will take the lectern – and the stand – in a $1.2 million dispute with the firm that advised it on its deferred compensation and profit-sharing plan.
3 minute read
October 07, 2013 | The Recorder

MoFo Loses Trusts and Estates Team to Shartsis

4 minute read
March 16, 2011 | New York Law Journal

Boutique Raids the Usual BigLaw Firm for Lateral Partner

2 minute read
December 31, 2009 | The Recorder

Shartsis Sues Client, Gets Quick Response

Arthur Shartsis said his firm was forced to file suit Wednesday to recover an $11.5 million performance bonus for the Princeton litigation. Soon after, he was told a check was already in the mail.
3 minute read
May 14, 2007 | Law.com

How Small Firms Are Managing $160,000 Salaries

Some small firms have matched the $160,000 associate pay of large firms, but attempting to cover the cost through higher billing rates or more billed hours could erode the smaller firm's competitive advantages over megafirms. Consultants say that premium firms come with built-in advantages that help them absorb rate and salary increases -- and even potentially profit from them. Shartsis Friese managing partner Arthur Shartsis says his firm keeps up with rate increases because the impact is not significant.
6 minute read
May 29, 2007 | National Law Journal

Pillsbury, others hit or exceed $160K mark for associate salaries

Just when you thought the bandwagon was packed, another handful of California firms have announced associate salary hikes. Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman became the latest large firm to move first-year pay up to $160,000. And in the midsize camp, Munger, Tolles & Olson boosted first-year pay to the $160,000 level, while Shartsis Friese took its top-billing associates to $165,000. In a prepared statement, Pillsbury said the salary hike won't come at the cost of associates or clients.
3 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources