NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'quality'

You can use to get even better search results
In re Lottery.com Sec. Litig.
Publication Date: 2024-02-16
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1:22-cv-07111

Proxy's Financial Projections Were Accompanied by Sufficient Cautionary Language

February 15, 2024 | The Recorder

When Seeking a Settlement Administrator, Price Is Only Part of the Equation

"The inquiry about the lowest bid often echoes loudly, yet this should not overshadow the multitude of other pivotal factors that govern the effectiveness and integrity of the settlement administration process," according to CPT Group's Dominique Fite and Ryan Schley.
10 minute read
February 15, 2024 | Daily Report Online

Consumer Class Action Accuses Mercedes-Benz of Concealing Defective Interior Trims

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar, ALM's source for immediate alerting on just-filed cases in state and federal courts. Law.com Radar now offers state court coverage nationwide. Sign up today and be among the first to know about new suits in your region, practice area or client sector.
3 minute read
February 15, 2024 | Corporate Counsel

FTC Scrutinizing Volume Discounts in Pharma, Using Dormant Law It Could Apply to Other Industries

"Sellers in every industry should monitor these developments to see how the agency's enforcement priorities evolve and are treated by the courts, so they can calibrate their compliance policies accordingly," said Mary Kaiser, a Morrison & Foerster partner.
4 minute read
February 15, 2024 | Law.com

Protecting Technology-Assisted Works and Inventions: Where Does Smart Technology End and AI Begin?

At what point does a "smart" computing system, or advanced software program, qualify as AI in the eyes of pertinent regulatory or judicial authorities? When is an individual considered to have merely deployed an AI-based computing tool to assist with creating a work of art or conceiving of a technological innovation? Each of these questions is explored in this article, giving consideration to currently prevailing guidelines from administrative bodies and the courts.
11 minute read
Law Journal Press | Digital Book Chester County Court Rules 2024 Authors: View this Book

View more book results for the query "quality"

February 15, 2024 | Corporate Counsel

GC's Signature Deal Under Assault by Boeing Critics

"The promises Boeing made" in its deferred prosecution agreement "are hollow," said Paul Cassell, a University of Utah criminal law professor representing families of 737 Max crash victims.
7 minute read
In the Matter of an Article 6 Custody/Visitation Proceeding Joseph N.T.
Publication Date: 2024-02-15
Practice Area: Family Law
Industry:
Court: Family Court, New York
Judge: Support Magistrate Pamela Scheininger
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Katherine R. (Petitioner)
For defendant: Zacaria P. P. Jr (Respondent)
Case number: V-05970-21/23D

Mother Awarded Custody, Father Not Allowed to Relocate Child

Revitalize Auto Communities Environmental Response Trust v. National Grid USA
Publication Date: 2024-02-15
Practice Area: Environmental Law
Industry: Automotive | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Beth Robinson
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Laura E. Jensen, on the brief, Jeffrey D. Talbert, Preti, Flaherty, Beliveau & Pachios, LLP, Portland, ME. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Alan J. Knauf, Linda R. Shaw, Amy K. Kendall, Jonathan R. Tantillo, Knauf Shaw LLP, Rochester, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellee Lockheed Martin Corporation: Steven T. Miano, Peter V. Keays, on the brief, Robert A. Wiygul, Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller, Philadelphia, PA. For Defendant-Appellee General Electric Company: Dean S. Sommer, Kristin Carter Rowe, Young/Sommer LLC, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Northeast Management Services, Inc.: Douglas H. Zamelis, The Law Office of Douglas H. Zamelis, Cooperstown, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Syracuse Deere Road Associates, LLC and Hauler's Facility LLC: Gregory M. Brown, Fogel & Brown, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees National Grid USA and Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation: Yvonne E. Hennessey, Barclay Damon LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Verizon New York Inc. as successor to Telesector Resources Group, Inc.: Philip H. Gitlen, Whiteman Osterman & Hanna LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Honeywell International Inc.: Geoffrey Michael, Lauren C. Daniel, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Circle Business Complex LLC, North Midler Properties, LLC, and Syracuse LePage LLC: Michael A. Fogel, Fogel & Brown, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Circle Business Complex LLC, North Midler Properties, LLC, Syracuse LePage LLC, Syracuse Deere Road Associates, LLC, Hauler's Facility LLC: Patrick D. Donnelly, McGivney, Kluger Clark & Intoccia, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Amparit Industries, LLC: Lori E. Petrone, Kenney Shelton Liptak Nowak, LLP, Buffalo, NY. For Defendant-Appellee B&B Family Limited Partnership: Joseph R. Talarico, II, Talarico Law Firm, Fayetteville, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Jagar Enterprises, Inc.: Linda E. Alario, Syracuse, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Magna Powertrain USA, Inc., and New Process Gear, Inc.: John J. Kuster, Sidney Austin LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Onondaga Pottery Company, Inc.: Andrew C. Rose, Nixon Peabody LLP, Albany, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Metalico New York, Inc. and Metalico Syracuse Realty, Inc.: Albert J. Millus, Jr., Hinman, Howard & Kattell, LLP, Binghamton, NY. For Defendants-Appellees C&S Engineers, Inc. and Calocerinos and Spina: Paul D. Sylvestri, Harter Secrest & Emery LLP, Rochester NY. For Defendants-Appellees Carrier Corporation, Carlyle Air Conditioning Company Inc., and Raytheon Technologies Corporation f/k/a United Technologies Corporation: Elizabeth C. Barton, Erick M. Sandler, Day Pitney LLP, Hartford, CT. For Defendant-Appellee Bristol-Meyers Squibb Company: Glen R. Stuart, Adina D. Bingham, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA, and Bernard J. Garbutt, III, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Nokia of America Corporation and Western Electric Company, Incorporated: Meaghan G. Boyd, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, and David Venderbush, Alston & Bird LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Gardner Denver, Inc.: Daniel T. Flaherty, Daniel C.W. Narvey, Godfrey & Kahn, S.C., Milwaukee
Case number: 22-1589-cv

Consent Decree Resolved Only RACER's CERCLA Liability as to Plant, Pollutants Therefrom

Appellate Division, First Department: February 15, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-02-15
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Term, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on: February 13, 2024

February 14, 2024 | Law.com

One Year After GPT-4: What Generative AI Means to Lawyers

[ON-DEMAND ONLY] This event is now available on-demand. If you have previously registered for this event please login here using the email that you…
4 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now