NEXT
Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Bressler Amery & Ross'

You can use to get even better search results Bressler Amery & Ross
October 25, 2004 | New Jersey Law Journal

Primus v. Alfred Sanzari Enterprises et al.

In this multidefendant case, where one of the tortfeasors who contributed to the settlement was represented by the New Jersey Property-Liability Insurance Guaranty Association because its insurer was insolvent, and the aggregate non-Association contributions to the settlement exceeded the amount of the workers' compensation lien, all sums paid by the solvent insurers are available to satisfy the lien, and the compensation carrier is entitled to full reimbursement of its lien from non-Association funds.
12 minute read
February 21, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

Fatal Blast Suit Settles for $1.37M

Large settlements and verdicts in New Jersey.
6 minute read
March 10, 2010 | New Jersey Law Journal

A Look at the FINRA'S Rules Limiting Motions To Dismiss in Arbitration Proceedings

Severely restricting the ability to dismiss frivolous claims may force respondents into early settlement and mediation — a more cost-effective alternative to arbitration. However, the restriction forces those respondents desiring a decision on the merits — either through dismissal or award after a hearing — to waste time and resources defending frivolous claims.
8 minute read
December 23, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

Employee 'Free Choice' Act: The Ultimate Union Bailout

Get ready for passage of a law that will simultaneously deprive employees of the right to decide whether to join a union free of union coercion or intimidation and employers of the right to campaign against a union.
4 minute read
May 19, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

Aly v. E.S. Sutton Realty et al, etc.,

Here, where a Pennsylvania insurance company authorized to offer commercial general-liability insurance policies in New Jersey was placed into rehabilitation by a Pennsylvania court, which also ordered a stay of all proceedings in Pennsylvania "or elsewhere" against the company and against all its insureds for 90 days, which stay was extended numerous times, principles of comity dictate that New Jersey trial courts honor the initial stay for rehabilitation and that they continue to honor the extensions i
15 minute read
July 24, 2006 | New Jersey Law Journal

N.J. Mergers & Acquisitions

Mergers and acquisitions involving N.J. companies.
2 minute read
June 23, 2003 | New Jersey Law Journal

The Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Cybergenics Corporation v. Chinery, etc., et al,

Bankruptcy courts may authorize creditors' committees to sue derivatively to avoid fraudulent transfers for the benefit of the estate; Hartford Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Union Planters Bank, a Chapter 7 case that interpreted the text of 11 U.S.C. � 506(c) to foreclose anyone other than a trustee from seeking to recover administrative costs on its own behalf, does not operate to prevent the Bankruptcy Court from authorizing such suits; the judgment of the District Court is reversed.
10 minute read
May 02, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

ARCNET Architects, Inc. v. New Jersey Property-Liability Insurance Guaranty Association

Pursuant to the 2004 amendment to the Property-Liability Insurance Guaranty Association Act that clarified the definition of "covered claims," attorneys' fees and other claim expenses incurred prior to the date of an insurance company's insolvency are not, and never have been, covered claims; thus, the attorneys' fees and other related claim expenses here, incurred before the amendment's effective date, are not payable by PLIGA.
8 minute read
January 21, 2005 | New Jersey Law Journal

In re Mercedes-Benz Antitrust Litigation

Where defendants moved for summary judgment and plaintiffs moved to strike affidavits filed in support of the motion because of defendants' failure to disclose affiants' identities (an officer for the corporation and an expert), or that they had knowledge of issues in support of the motion, defendants were required to disclose the identify of the officer but not the expert, and such failure was not harmless or justified; although the affidavit is not excluded, plaintiffs are given opportunity to depose him.
13 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Leveraging Technology to Improve Employee Engagement and Client Satisfaction

    Brought to you by CARET Legal

    Download Now

  • How to Choose Your Legal Operations Software: Key Considerations and Expert Tips

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • Yearly Roundup: Strategic Insights for Law Firm Decision Making

    Brought to you by CARET Legal

    Download Now

  • Lex Machina Contracts: Commercial Litigation Report 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now