NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP'

You can use to get even better search results Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
February 01, 2012 | Corporate Counsel

Moves: Reverse Commute

2 minute read
September 26, 2005 | Law.com

2005 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
516 minute read
September 28, 2009 | New Jersey Law Journal

2009 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
453 minute read
October 11, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Rise in Stockholder-Adopted Bylaws, Proxy Contests Nears

Ethan Klingsberg, a partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, writes that the summer of 2006 turned out to be prime season for changes to the legal landscape that provide opportunities for activist stockholders to increase their influence through bylaw amendments and proxy contests.
13 minute read
November 16, 2011 | New York Law Journal

Exploring the Nexus Requirement in Obstruction of Justice Prosecutions

Lewis Liman, partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, analyzes a Second Circuit decision that leaves uncertain the scope of future obstruction of justice prosecutions. Prosecutors, defense lawyers, and businesses, he cautions, should keep a keen eye on federal courts as they continue to interpret the statute's language in either broad or narrow terms.
12 minute read
January 01, 2013 | The American Lawyer

Big Deals

The law firms that handled the biggest recent deals in Europe.
8 minute read
September 25, 2008 | New Jersey Law Journal

2008 Ineligible List

Notice to the bar.
440 minute read
July 22, 2002 | New York Law Journal

After Sept. 11, Record Number of Lawyers Answer the Call to Take on Pro Bono

ON THE morning of Sept. 20, 2001 when officials were still counting the dead and missing from terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and threats of deadly anthrax virus filled the daily press five of Manhattan`s biggest la w firms sat down together for what participants knew was a moment of bearing witness to history.
11 minute read
July 01, 2013 | The American Lawyer

Arbitration Scorecard 2013: Treaty Disputes

Treaty arbitrations active in 2011–13 in which at least $100 million was at stake.
67 minute read
November 29, 2006 | New York Law Journal

Securities Act Class Action: SLUSA Nixes State Jurisdiction

Mitchell A. Lowenthal, a partner at Cleary Gottlieb Steen and Hamilton LLP, and Timothy M. Haggerty, an associate at the firm, write that SLUSA gave federal courts exclusive jurisdiction over claims brought under the Securities Act. Nevertheless, plaintiffs have continued to bring class claims under the Securities Act in state courts, arguing that SLUSA left open a loophole for class actions solely raising claims under the Securities Act.
16 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Lex Machina Contracts: Commercial Litigation Report 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • White Collar Investigation Practice: Global Expertise in Complex Investigations

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

  • Criminal Division's Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs: September 2024 Updates Review

    Brought to you by NAVEX Global

    Download Now

  • Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now