Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Barrack, Rodos & Bacine'

You can use to get even better search results
Barrack, Rodos Bacine v. Ballon Stoll Bader Nadler PC, 08 Civ. 02152
Publication Date: 2008-03-26
Practice Area: Attorneys Fees
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Peter Leisure
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08 Civ. 02152

District Judge Peter K. Leisure U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK William J. Ban, Esq. Daniel E. Bacine, Esq. Barrack, Rodos & Ba

January 31, 2008 |

Barrack Wins Investors' Class Action

Barrack Rodos & Bacine has won what is believed to be the largest plaintiff verdict in a securities class action case since the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was passed in 1995.
5 minute read
August 13, 2008 |

Barrack Rodos' $277 Mil. Win Overturned by District Court

What began as a banner year for Philadelphia-based national class action firm Barrack Rodos & Bacine has taken a bit of a downturn.
5 minute read
Barrack Rodos Pockets $48 Million Fee Award for Sticking Out Apollo Class Action
Publication Date: 2012-04-23
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Brushing aside objections by a group of shareholders, a judge in Phoenix gave final approval on Friday to the full $48.4 million in attorney fees Barrack Rodos had requested late last year as part of a $145 million class settlement.

June 12, 2002 |

Class Antitrust Litigator Joining Fox Rothschild

Fox Rothschild O`Brien & Frankel will begin its foray into class action antitrust litigation next week with the addition of former Barrack Rodos & Bacine partner Steven A. Asher.
3 minute read
August 13, 2008 |

Barrack Rodos' $277 Mil. Win Overturned by District Court

In January, Philadelphia-based national class action firm Barrack Rodos & Bacine helped a class of investors win a $277 million verdict awarded by a jury that said Phoenix-based for-profit corporation Apollo Group Inc. had misled investors. Now, a little over six months later, a Phoenix federal district court has thrown out the verdict, which was believed to have been the largest in a securities class action case since the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was passed in 1995.
5 minute read
February 04, 2008 |

Securities class action verdict in Univ. of Phoenix case may be recordbreaking

Law firm Barrack Rodos & Bacine has won what is believed to be the largest plaintiffs' verdict in a securities class action case since the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act was passed in 1995. Apollo Group, which owns the University of Phoenix, and its former CEO and CFO were ordered to pay as much as $5.55 per share to shareholders who alleged that the company hid a government report charging that student recruitment practices violated federal rules. The full verdict amount is not yet known.
5 minute read
May 17, 1999 |

'Lead Plaintiff' Gets Lesson in Securities Class Actions

Charles Chalmers, a San Francisco lawyer, unknowingly became a "lead plaintiff" in one of 23 class actions alleging securities fraud by Digital Lightwave Inc., a maker of test products for high-speed telecommunications networks. Chalmers' experience sheds light on what happens in practice under the reforms to investor class actions that Congress enacted in 1995 to target abuses by plaintiffs lawyers. And if his saga is any example, the law may not be working as Congress intended.
8 minute read
May 17, 1999 |

Huh? I'm the Lead Plaintiff?

Plaintiffs' lawyers in a securities suit against Digital Lightwave Inc., accused of cooking the books to lure unwary investors, may have got more than they bargained for when they made San Francisco investor and lawyer Charles Chalmers a lead plaintiff. Chalmers, invoking a federal statute designed to give principal plaintiffs in such cases more control, claims a settlement in the case was inadequate and that, moreover, he was never properly informed of his status as a "class representative."
8 minute read
April 18, 2005 |

ATTORNEY FEES | Lead lawyers decide who gets paid

Rejecting an appeal brought by three law firms that demanded portions of the $55 million in attorney fees awarded in the $3.2 billion settlement of the Cendant Corp. securities litigation, the 3d U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that the lawyers who were named to lead the case have the power to say who gets paid.
3 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT