NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Edgar Snyder & Associates'

You can use to get even better search results
August 11, 2003 |

NEWS

Jennings v. Regional Performing Arts Center
5 minute read
Harris v. Amgen, Inc.
Publication Date: 2013-06-04
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Before: Jerome Farris and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen J. Fearon, Jr. and Garry T. Stevens, Jr., Squitieri & Fearon, LLP, New York, New York; Stephen M. Fishback and Daniel L. Keller, Keller, Fishback & Jackson, LLP, Tarzana, California; Francis M. Gregorek, Betsy C. Manifold, and Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, San Diego, California, Mark C. Rifkin (argued), Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, New York, New York; and Thomas James McKenna, Gainey & McKenna, New York, New York, for Appellants.
For defendant: Emily Seymour Costin, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Steven Oliver Kramer and Jonathan David Moss, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jonathan Rose, Alston & Bird, LLP, Washington, D.C.; John Nadolenco, Mayer Brown, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Brian David Netter, Mayer Brown, LLP, Washington, D.C.; and Robert P. Davis (argued), Mayer Brown, LLP, New York, New York, for Appellees.
Case number: No. 10-56014

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 5620STEVE HARRIS; DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos; DONALD HANKS; JORGE TORRES; ALBERT CAPPA, On Behalf of Themselves and All Othe

January 02, 2013 |

Plaintiffs Must Show Driver Was Served Free Drinks While Visibly Drunk

An Allegheny County trial judge has ruled that plaintiffs injured in an automobile accident with a drunken driver cannot recover under a claim that a defendant liquor licensee violated Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board Regulations by serving the driver more than one free alcoholic beverage, without first showing that the driver was visibly intoxicated at the time.
5 minute read
March 19, 2013 |

Superior Court Departs From Sackett, Approves Stacking

In litigation over "stacking" uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage in Pennsylvania, lawyers would be remiss not to prominently cite Sackett v. Nationwide Mutual and its progeny of three state appellate court rulings.
6 minute read
May 28, 2012 |

Suits pile up over toning shoes

Skechers and other major footwear makers are the target of dozens of lawsuits over toning shoes.
6 minute read
May 08, 2012 |

To Incur Liability for Dog Bite, Landlord Must Know of Danger

A Pennsylvania Superior Court panel has ruled that a landlord does not have responsibility for a child's injury from being bitten by a tenant's dog because the landlord had no knowledge of any dangerous propensities the dog might have had.
5 minute read
November 24, 2003 |

Verdicts and Settlements

50/50 Verdict in Slip and Fall Lawsuit Salser v. Days Inn $643,644 Verdict Date of Verdict: July 16, 2003. Court and Case Number: C.P. Westmoreland, No. 2344. Judge: Gary P. Caruso. Type of Action: Slip
7 minute read
March 22, 2002 |

Request for Cut in UM-UIM Coverage Doesn`t Need Separate Policy Page

An insured`s request for reduced UM-UIM coverage does not need to be on its own page in an insurance policy, the Supreme Court has ruled for the first time.
6 minute read
Harris v. Amgen, Inc.
Publication Date: 2013-10-23
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding Before: Jerome Farris and William A. Fletcher, Circuit Judges, and Edward R. Korman, Senior District Judge.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen J. Fearon, Jr. and Garry T. Stevens, Jr., Squitieri & Fearon, LLP, New York, New York; Stephen M. Fishback and Daniel L. Keller, Keller, Fishback & Jackson, LLP, Tarzana, California; Francis M. Gregorek, Betsy C. Manifold, and Rachele R. Rickert, Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, San Diego, California, Mark C. Rifkin (argued), Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz, LLP, New York, New York; and Thomas James McKenna, Gainey & McKenna, New York, New York, for Appellants.
For defendant: Emily Seymour Costin, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Steven Oliver Kramer and Jonathan David Moss, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Jonathan Rose, Alston & Bird, LLP, Washington, D.C.; John Nadolenco, Mayer Brown, LLP, Los Angeles, California; Brian David Netter, Mayer Brown, LLP, Washington, D.C.; and Robert P. Davis (argued), Mayer Brown, LLP, New York, New York, for Appellees.
Case number: No. 10-56014

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 11630 STEVE HARRIS; DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos; DONALD HANKS; JORGE TORRES; ALBERT CAPPA, On Behalf of Themselves and All O

Resources

  • 2024 Report: State of AI in Legal

    Brought to you by Ironclad

    Download Now

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now