NEXT
Search Results

0 results for 'Nichols Kaster'

You can use to get even better search results
October 15, 2009 | National Law Journal

Full 7th Circuit leaves verbal complaints at employee's own risk

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit on Thursday declined to hear a workplace retaliation case en banc, letting stand the panel's decision that the Fair Labor Standards Act doesn't protect "unwritten purely verbal complaints."
2 minute read
Casey v. Citibank, 5:12-CV-820
Publication Date: 2013-01-04
Practice Area: Banking
Industry:
Court: U. S. District Court, Northern District
Judge: District Judge David Hurd
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Donald H. Nichols, Esq., E. Michelle Drake, Esq., Kai H. Richter, Esq., Of Counsel, Nichols Kaster, PLLP, Minneapolis, MN. Matthew C. Helland, Esq., Of Counsel, One Embarcadero Center, San Francisco, CA. Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Patrick F. Madden, Esq., Sarah R. Schalman-Bergen, Esq., Shanon J. Carson, Esq., of Counsel, Berger & Montague, P.C., Philadelphia, PA.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc.; and Citigroup, Inc.: Christopher J. Willis, Esq., Sarah T. Reise, Esq., Stefanie H. Jackman, Esq., Of Counsel, Ballard Spahr, LLP, Atlanta, GA. Attorneys for Defendants Citibank, N.A.; CitiMortgage, Inc.; and Citigroup, Inc.: Mitchell J. Katz, Esq., Teresa M. Bennett, Esq., Of Counsel, Menter, Rudin & Trivelpiece, P.C., Syracuse, NY. Attorneys for Defendants MidFirst Bank, N.A. and FirstInsure, Inc.: David S. Kantrowitz, Esq., John C. Englander, Esq., Matthew G. Lindenbaum, Esq., of Counsel, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA. Attorneys for Defendants MidFirst Bank, N.A. and FirstInsure, Inc.: Edward G. Melvin, Esq., Robert J. Smith, Esq., of Counsel, Costello, Cooney & Fearon, PLLC, Syracuse, NY.
Case number: 5:12-CV-820

Cite as: Casey v. Citibank, 5:12-CV-820, NYLJ 1202583126326, at *1 (NDNY, Decided ry 2, 2013)District Judge David HurdDecided:

March 23, 2011 | Corporate Counsel

Baristas' Suit Against Starbucks May Proceed as Class Action in Mass. Federal Court

A Boston federal judge has certified a Massachusetts class action against Starbucks Corp. over its tip policy on the same day plaintiffs appealed a New York federal court's judgment on the same policy to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit.
4 minute read
September 24, 2012 | National Law Journal

Two suits against BoA over flood insurance resurface

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has revived lawsuits brought by two homeowners against Bank of America Corp. for requiring them to buy flood insurance of greater value than their mortgage principal amount.
5 minute read
May 29, 2013 | The Recorder

Judge Tosses Another Wal-Mart Sex Bias Class Action

3 minute read
September 26, 2012 | Daily Business Review

Two suits against Bank of America over flood insurance resurface

The First Circuit revived two separate cases against Bank of America for forcing homeowners to buy flood insurance coverage that exceeds their mortgage principal. The 2-1 majorities based their rulings on an analysis of language in the relevant but different documents.
5 minute read
February 09, 2012 | National Law Journal

Homeowners dispute lenders' flood insurance requirement as excessive

Two homeowners challenged at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit a requirement by mortgage lenders that they carry flood insurance coverage that exceeds their mortgage principal.
7 minute read
March 24, 2011 | New York Law Journal

Federal Judge Certifies Class Action Against Starbucks Over Tip Policy

5 minute read
March 23, 2011 | The Legal Intelligencer

Mass. Judge OKs Baristas' Class Action Against Starbucks

A Boston federal judge has certified a Massachusetts class action against Starbucks Corp. over its tip policy on the same day plaintiffs appealed a New York federal court's judgment on the same policy to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
4 minute read

Resources