0 results for 'Curtis'
Court Blocks Access to Surveillance Video Collected by Police
Video of a two-vehicle collision captured by a casino's surveillance camera and then collected as evidence by police does not need to be turned over to the public, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.Rare Recovery for Bombing Victims Leads to Fee Disputes
After more than 15 years of litigation and a series of legal hurdles, U.S. Marines in the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing and their family members have started to receive compensation from a nearly $2 billion fund. But the orderly payout may be complicated by disagreements over attorney fees, among other issues.Outside Clownsel: Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade a Funny Side Gig
Fort Lauderdale attorney Chuck Tatelbaum shows his silly side once a year as a clown in the Macy's Thanksgiving Day Parade.Commonwealth Court Blocks Access to Surveillance Video Collected by Police
Video of a two-vehicle collision captured by a casino's surveillance camera and then collected as evidence by police does not need to be turned over to the public, the Commonwealth Court has ruled.Preservation of Issues Is a Prerequisite for Appellate Review
Joseph P. Sullivan of Holland & Knight discusses the decision in 'Misicki', which adopted a sensible and practical rule in limiting invocation of the preservation requirement and its exception to a party in an adversary position in litigation.'Falling Object' Liability: Contrasts in First and Second Departments
Construction Accident Litigation columnist Brian J. Shoot revisits the issue arising in the law concerning Labor Law §240 on "falling object" liability and what, precisely, qualifies as an object that "requires securing for the purposes of the undertaking."Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc.
Click Here for FC&S Legal Expert Analysis Howellv.Hamilton Meats & Provisions, Inc.HamivvKeyCite Yellow Flag - Negative TreatmentDisagreed…False Claims and Mail and Wire Fraud: Implications of 'Universal Health'
White-Collar Crime columnists Elkan Abramowitz and Jonathan Sack examine the U.S. Supreme Court's decision into a thorny issue concerning "omissions" in the context of the civil False Claims Act, which prohibits false and fraudulent monetary claims for payment made to the federal government. In 'Universal Health Services v. United States', decided in June 2016, the Supreme Court extended the FCA to a new category of omissions by adopting the "implied certification theory"—roughly, that claims for payment from the government can, in certain circumstances, implicitly certify that the payee has satisfied the legal requirements for payment. They explain how the implied certification theory might also apply to mail and wire fraud cases.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
The Power of Online Reputation Management For Attorneys: A Critical Tool For Law Firms in 2025
Brought to you by Erase.com
Download Now
The Role of Evolving Support Structures in Optimizing Legal Talent
Brought to you by BigHand
Download Now
Corporate Monitorship Advisory Services
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
AI-Powered Deposition and Medical Record Summaries: Low Risk, High Reward
Brought to you by Parrot
Download Now