Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Mayer Brown'

You can use to get even better search results
June 27, 2001 |

Taking Names (off the Door)

They call it branding. It's the law firm marketing director's quest to make the firm's name a household word to all the in-houses. It's shooting to become the Coke or Ford of the new law business. And, says Chicago lawyer Gerald Skoning, in the process of designing a sleek new image for the legal marketplace, many prominent name partners of prestigious corporate law firms are being branded into obscurity.
4 minute read
FINK v SHAWANGUNK CONSERVANCY, INC.
Publication Date: 2005-02-10
Practice Area: Real Property | Torts
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, 3rd Dept
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 96458

Decided and Entered: February 10, 2005 96458 ________________________________ MICHAEL FINK et al., Appellants, v SHAWANGUNK CONSERVANCY, INC., Respondent.

PULLMAN GROUP, LLC v. PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA
Publication Date: 2003-07-03
Practice Area: Antitrust | Banking | Business Law | Contracts | Intellectual Property
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

New York, Supreme Court New York Law Journal

Second Circuit Revives Copyright Case Against Google, YouTube
Publication Date: 2012-04-05
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court:
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

Viacom International is getting a second shot at proving that YouTube massively infringed its copyrights by hosting clips from shows like "The Daily Show" and "Family Guy" without its permission. And whether Viacom and its lawyers succeed or not, they've already managed to shape the developing case law over copyrighted content that users illegally upload to the Internet.

Lester Napier v. Laurel County, Kentucky; Jack
Publication Date: 2011-02-13
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 6th Cir.
Judge: McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-6239

RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206Argued: October 20, 2010Before: MARTIN and McKEAGUE, Circuit Judges; LUDINGTON, District Judge.a HREF="#D*fn1" NAME="S*fn

September 29, 2010 |

Brazilian Bar Concludes Foreign Law Firm Alliances Break Rules

The legal market in Brazil has been particularly active in recent months, with firms like Milbank and Gibson Dunn announcing they were opening Brazilian offices. But a recent ethical and disciplinary panel opinion of the Sao Paulo Bar illustrates the mounting tension over the influx of foreign firms into one of the world's fastest-growing economies. Although only advisory, the opinion indicates where a more formal ruling might fall if a case were brought against major U.S. firms operating in Brazil in alliance with local firms.
3 minute read
Bradley v. Jusino, 04 Civ. 8411
Publication Date: 2009-05-26
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Robert Sweet
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 04 Civ. 8411

District Judge Robert W. Sweet U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: Attorneys for Plaintiff James I. Meyerson, Esq.

September 22, 2009 |

The Supreme Court Cert Pool: Sotomayor Joins It, Lawyers Attack It

As expected, new Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor has joined the Court's so-called cert pool, at least for now. The controversial pooling arrangement, whereby the thousands of incoming certiorari petitions are divvied up among the clerks of the justices who participate, came under considerable criticism at a conference Friday on the Court's case selection process. One prominent theory about why the Court's docket has shrunk has to do with the cert pool, and it might be labeled the "timid law clerk" syndrome.
5 minute read
December 09, 2009 |

Supreme Court Rejects Early Appeals of Attorney-Client Privilege Determinations

Federal court orders requiring litigants to disclose information that they believe is protected by the attorney-client privilege do not qualify for immediate appeal, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Tuesday. In her first opinion since joining the Court, Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote that permitting successive, piecemeal appeals of all adverse attorney-client privilege rulings "would unduly delay the resolution of district court litigation and needlessly burden the Courts of Appeals."
4 minute read
February 11, 2009 |

Large Firm Layoffs Lead to Small Firm Startups

Omair Farooqui had always wanted to hang up his own shingle, but he had a good job as a mid-level intellectual property associate at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips. With a regular paycheck, why rush to rock the boat?
7 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Good Legal Technology is Good Business: A Case for Bringing Employment Issues In-House

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Insights and Strategies for Effective Succession Planning in AM Law 100 Firms

    Brought to you by Gallagher

    Download Now

  • State AI Legislation Is on the Move in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • 2024 ESI Risk Management & Litigation Readiness Report

    Brought to you by Pagefreezer

    Download Now

NEXT