0 results for 'Stroock'
Trump's Election Sparks New Interest in Pro Bono
The prospect of Donald Trump in the White House has galvanized more lawyers to volunteer their time, law firm pro bono coordinators say. What's first on the pro bono agenda?Kasowitz Benson Picks Up Two Akerman Real Estate Partners
Manuel A. Fernandez and Albert J. Delgado make the crosstown move in Miami.A Judge's Empirical Experience in Class Action Litigation
Shira A. Scheindlin, in preparation for a recent symposium, reviewed all of the class action cases she handled during her years on the Southern District bench, and here shares elementary statistical information that she found to be of interest and might be of interest to those lawyers who toil, have toiled, or plan to toil in the class action arena.Delinquent Payments: Addressing Usury Defenses and Public Notice Claims
In their Cooperatives and Condominiums column, Eva Talel and Richard Siegler examine the legal ramifications of imposing monetary charges, such as late fees, interest and the like, for non-payment or late payment of proprietary rent (maintenance) or common charges. They also discuss the statute and case law relating to New York criminal usury, as they may apply to such charges, and analyze recent case law addressing potential defamation claims if the names of owners in default are published, made public or otherwise disclosed.Challenges to Candidates: Residency and Timing
In their Government and Election Law column, Jerry H. Goldfeder and Myrna Pérez focus on two cases that are significant to voters and practitioners in New York. The first significant case involves a candidate's residency, and how it affects his eligibility to run for office. The second case involved a candidate for U.S. Congress who was declared eligible to run but was, nevertheless, denied a place on the ballot—because the state Supreme Court rendered its decision only four days before the scheduled primary election.When a Detective Deceives—And the Lawyer Knows It
In his Ethics and Criminal Practice column, Joel Cohen explores the ethical rules surrounding lawyers' oversight of investigators who use deceit. Most recently, a decision by Judge Jed Rakoff in 'Meyer v. Kalanick' put the import of ABA Rule 5.3 well into perspective for lawyers who hire or supervise investigators who would use deception to gain helpful or even essential information. Rakoff used the opportunity to remind counsel that, beyond the Rules, litigation requires truth-seeking, coupled with zealous advocacy.Judges and a Journalist Talk About Getting Along
A journalist and jurists talk about how to control the news at a panel discussion in Lower Manhattan.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
2025 State Legislative Sessions
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Retention & Online Reputation for Law Firms: 2025 Guide
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
Europe's Escalating Regulatory Framework: Mapping Efforts to Mitigate Supply Chain Risks
Brought to you by LRN
Download Now
5 Proven Steps to Accelerate Business Growth in a Crowded Legal Market
Brought to you by AllRize
Download Now