Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner''

You can use to get even better search results
REGENXBIO Inc. v. Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-01-22
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Biotechnology | Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Susan E. Morrison, Casey M. Kraning, Fish & Richardson P.C., Wilmington, DE; Brian D. Coggio, Jeremy T. Saks, Fish & Richardson P.C., New York, NY; Kurt L. Glitzenstein, J. Peter Fasse, Fish & Richardson P.C., Boston, MA, John R. Lane, Fish & Richardson P.C., Houston, TX; Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Julie S. Goldemberg, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA; Janice H. Logan, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Derek J. Fahnestock, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; William B. Raich, Michael J. Flibbert, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC; Andrew M. Berdon, Robert B. Wilson, James E. Baker, Anastasia M. Fernands, Laura Fairneny, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, New York, NY; Molly Moore, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Washington, DC; Charles E. Lipsey, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA; Steven G. Madison, James Bieber, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
Case number: 20-1226-RGA

Merely combining natural gene sequences was insufficient to create a patentable invention.

Bayer CropScience LP v. Corteva, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-11-20
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Agriculture | Manufacturing
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Rennie
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Rodger D. Smith, Ryan D. Stottman, Rachel R. Tunney, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Deborah E. Fishman, David Denuyl, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA; David R. Marsh, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Washington, DC; Aaron Stiefel, Neda Dadpey, Michael Mazzullo, Arnold & Porter Kaye Schholer LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Chad S.C. Stover, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael D. Flibbert, Pier D. DeRoo, Kassandra M. Officer, Rachael D. Dippold, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case number: N22C-07-168 SKR CCLD

Court declined to strike patent invalidity defense raised by licensee where it could continue to accrue royalty obligations under the terms of the license agreement despite the patents having expired and other parties who may have licensed or infringed upon the patent would also benefit from a finding of invalidity.

Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. V. Sarpeta Therapeutics, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-07-17
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Amy M. Dudash, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Wilmington, DE; Amanda S. Williamson, Christopher J. Betti, Krista L. Venegas, Maria E. Doukas, Zachary Miller, Guylaine Hache, Michael T. Sikora, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Chicago, IL; Eric Kraeutler, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Philadelphia, PA, for plaintiff.
For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Megan E. Dellinger, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Charles E. Lipsey, J. Derek , Ryan P. O'Quinn, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA; William B. Raich, Michael J. Flibbert, Yoonhee Kim, Yoonjin Lee, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Alissa K. Lipton, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Boston, MA for defendant.
Case number: 21-1015-GBW

Claim that patent terms were indefinite due to being susceptible to multiple meanings for a POSA rejected where the scientific evidence demonstrated that a POSA would only understand the term as having one meaning, and where defendant attempted to incorporate limiting language not supported by the intrinsic record.

Bial-Portela & CA. S.A. v. Alkem Lab. Ltd
Publication Date: 2022-10-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Steven J. Balick, Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; James B. Monroe, Jennifer H. Roscetti, Charles T. Collins-Chase, Lauren J. Dowty, Meredith H. Boerschlein, Ryan V. McDonnell, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Karen A. Jacobs, Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Samuel L. Moultrie, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Aaron F. Barkoff, Alejandro Menchaca, Rajendra A. Chiplunkar, Ben J. Mahon, Ashley M. Ratycz, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, LTD., Chicago, IL for defendant.
Case number: 18-304-CFC-CJB

Court found for defendants in part in a case claiming patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §271e(2)(A) for a new patent application for medication to treat partial-onset epileptic seizures.

Shure Inc. v. ClearOne, Inc.
Publication Date: 2021-11-02
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Electronics
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael P. Kelly, Brian R. Lemon, Alexandra M. Joyce, McCarter & English, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Gerald F. Ivey, Mareesa A. Frederick, Elizabeth D. Ferrill, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Elliot C. Cook, J. Derek McCorquindale, Alexander M. Boyer, David N. Lefcowitz, Luke H. MacDonald, Joseph M. Schaffner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Michael J. Flynn, Andrew M. Moshos, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; John C. Hueston, Douglas J. Dixon, Christina V. Rayburn, Sourabh Mishra, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Newport Beach, CA; Christine Woodin, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendant.
Case number: D69597

Because there was an issue of fact in this patent infringement suit as to whether defendant's design and plaintiff's product's design were substantially similar, defendant's motion for summary judgment failed.

Biogen Int'l GMBH v. Amneal Pharm. LLC
Publication Date: 2020-09-30
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Steven J. Balick, Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; James B. Monroe, Eric J. Fues, Laura P. Masurovsky, Paul W. Browning, Li Feng, Andrew E. Renison, Jeanette M. Roorda, and Aaron G. Clay, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC; William F. Lee, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Stephen B. Brauerman, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; John C. Phillips, Jr., David A. Bilson, Phillips, Mclaughlin & Hall, P.A., Wilmington, DE; George C. Lombardi, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, IL, attorneys for defendants.
Case number: D69134

Court applied ruling from sister district under doctrine of collateral estoppel where concurrent case in which plaintiff participated also litigated issue of patent invalidity for lack of written description.

AgroFresh Inc. v. Mirtech, Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-01-16
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Agriculture | Chemicals and Materials | Consumer Products
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Chad S.C. Stover and Regina S.E. Murphy, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Robert D. Mac-Gill, Lynn C. Tyler, Deborah Pollack-Milgate, Joseph T. Wendt and Jessica M. Lindemann, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN for plaintiff.
For defendant: Frederick L. Cottrell, III, Jeffrey L. Moyer and Nicole K. Pedi of Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE; Gerald F. Ivey, John M. Williamson, Anand K. Sharma, Rajeev Gupta, Aidan C. Skoyles, Karthik Kumar and Daniel F. Roland, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case number: D68424

In this patent claim construction matter, the court provided clarification to give meaning to all the claim terms.

Nova Chem. Corp. v. Dow Chem. Co., DeFAX Case No. D66719 (D. Del. Sept. 30, 2015) Stark, C.J. (15 pages).
Publication Date: 2015-11-04
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D66719

Epic Communications, Inc. v. Richwave Technology, Inc.
Publication Date: 2015-06-24
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 6th
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Appellants Epic Communications, Inc., et al.: Kao & Swope, Chris Kao, Roubinian Law Group, Leon V. Roubinian
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Appellants Richwave Technology, Inc., et al.: Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, E. Robert Youches, Zhenyou Yang, Robert F. McCauley, Ming-Tao Yang
Case number: No. H037884

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 6656 EPIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v

FATIMA BINTA DIA, ETC. res, v. FIELDBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, ap
Publication Date: 2015-01-16
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION: SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Judge: Eng, P.J.; Mastro, Roman and Miller, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number:

FATIMA BINTA DIA, ETC. res, v. FIELDBRIDGE ASSOCIATES, LLC, ap — (INDEX NO. 15748/09)In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals from an order of

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources