Search Results

0 results for ''Klehr Harrison Harvey''

You can use to get even better search results
Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, PA v. FedEx Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-07-31
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Cargo and Shipping | Insurance
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert Cahall, McCormick & Priore, P.C., Newark, DE; Daniel McNeel Lane, Jr., Kelly A. Potter, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, San Antonio, TX; Mina Matin, Lisa Schapria, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Steven L. Caponi, Matthew B. Goeller, Megan E. O’Connor, K&L Gates LLP, Wilmington, DE; Carolyn M. Branthoover, Jessica L.G. Moran, K&L Gates LLP, Pittsburgh, PA; Richard M. Beck, Sally E. Veghte, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; James P. Ruggeri, Edward B. Parks, II, Sean T. Kelly, Ruggeri Parks Weinberg LLP, Washington, DC; Marc S. Casarino, Kennedys CMK LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: N22C-08-488 EMD CCLD

Court stayed action under comity where another jurisdiction determined to proceed with parallel action despite that case being second-filed since that action had connections to the jurisdiction, and staying the present action would avoid duplicative litigation or inconsistent results.

In the Matter of Egate-95, LLC v. Fitness International, LLC
Publication Date: 2022-10-01
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Unsigned Lindley, J.P., Nemoyer, Curran, Winslow, and Bannister, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 0692

In the Matter of Egate-95, LLC v. Fitness International, LLC

In the Matter of Egate-95, LLC v. Fitness International, LLC
Publication Date: 2022-10-01
Practice Area: Civil Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Judge: Unsigned Lindley, J.P., Nemoyer, Curran, Winslow, and Bannister, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 0691

In the Matter of Egate-95, LLC v. Fitness International, LLC

Parks v. Horizon Holdings, LLC
Publication Date: 2022-08-02
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Thomas V. Ayala, Sally E. Veghte, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Scott B. Czerwonka, Andrea S. Brooks, Wilks Law, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: D69902

Restrictive covenants in agreements governing asset purchase transaction for the sale of a business were governed by Delaware law where the parties had contractually chosen Delaware and where parties challenging the enforceability of the covenants failed to show that their home state's law would apply in the absence of the contractual choice.

BET FRX, LLC v. Myers
Publication Date: 2022-05-10
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Chancellor McCormick
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Sean M. Brennecke, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jordan M. Rand, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Samuel T. Hirzel, II, Jamie L. Brown, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric R. Levine, Eric Aschkenasy, Eiseman Levine Lehrhaupt & Kakoyiannis, P.C. New York, NY for defendants.
Case number: D69806

The court found that plaintiff's amended complaint failed to sufficiently plead most of its claims including breach of contract and breach of fiduciary duty.

Gower v. Trux, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-03-08
Practice Area: Corporate Governance
Industry: Software
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Brandon W. McCune, Blank Rome LLP, Wilmington, DE; Patrick J. Hannon, Hartley Michon Robb Hannon, LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Richard M. Beck, Sean M. Brennecke, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Lawrence P. Murray, Gregory Paonessa, Burns & Levinson LLP, Boston, MA; Kevin J. Mangan, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Wilmington, DE; Hayden J. Silver, III, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Raleigh, NC; S. Michael Sirkin, R. Garrett Rice, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Scott C. Ford Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky & Popeo, P.C., Boston, MA; Samuel T. Hirzel, Elizabeth A. DeFelice, Heyman Enerio Gattuso & Hirzel LLP, Wilmington, DE; Kevin T. Peters, Michael D. Brier, Gesmer Updegrove LLP, Boston, MA for defendants.
Case number: D69734

The court held that plaintiff adequately pled a breach of contract claim where he alleged the applicable agreement contained an unambiguous requirement that notice of share sales be given to all stockholders.

CIBC Bank USA v. JH Portfolio Debt Equities, LLC
Publication Date: 2021-06-16
Practice Area: Creditors' and Debtors' Rights
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kevin J. Mangan, Nicholas T. Verna, Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward S. Weil, Melanie J. Chico, Mark A. Silverman, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Chicago, IL for plaintiff.
For defendant: Raymond H. Lemisch, Sean M. Brennecke, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael Granne, Provenzano Granne & Bader LLP, New York, NY; Matthew B. Lunn, Mary F. Dugan, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; David E. Wilks, Andrea S. Brooks, Julie M. O’Dell, Wilks, Lukoff & Bracegirdle, LLC, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: D69430

Claims arising from defendants' entering into side agreements that purportedly interfered with plaintiff's security interest were dismissed where plaintiff failed to plead facts sufficient to show bad faith or that it induced the entry into the side agreements.

Appellate Division, First Department: May 20, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-05-24
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: May 20, 2021

Obsidian Fin. Group, LLC v. Identity Theft Guard Solutions, Inc.
Publication Date: 2021-05-12
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Consulting | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Slights
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Richard M. Beck, Craig E. Rushmore, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
For defendant: Brad D. Sorrels, Jessica A. Hartwell, Nora M. Crawford, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Wilming-ton, DE for defendants.
Case number: D69395

Failure of a transaction to meet the requirements of an earnout provision did not entitle plaintiff to relief, so the court granted defendant's motion to dismiss claims for breach of contract, reformation and declaratory relief.

Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. SIG Growth Equity Fund I, LLLP
Publication Date: 2021-01-20
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Investments and Investment Advisory | Software
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Glasscock
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Rudolf Koch, Robert L. Burns, Megan E. O’Connor, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Adam Slutsky, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: William B. Chandler III, Ian R. Liston, Jessica A. Hartwell, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, P.C., Wilmington, DE; Mark A. Kirsch, Scott A. Edelman, Aric H. Wu, Laura K. O’Boyle, Peter Wade, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York, NY; Lewis H. Lazarus Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Peter N. Flocos, Joanna A. Diakos, K&L Gates LLP, New York, NY; David S. Eagle, Sean M. Brennecke, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael K. Coran, William T. Hill, Monica Clarke Platt, Gregory R. Sellers, Klehr Harrison Harvey Branzburg LLP, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case number: D69263

Contractual fee shifting denied where plaintiffs prevailed on certain theories but recovery of minimal damages meant that neither side qualified as a "prevailing party" and equity did not warrant shifting of fees.

Resources