0 results for ''McNees Wallace Nurick''
FERC commissioners' statements following deadlock over proposed tariff were sufficient to demonstrate that the agency's "action through inaction" found the tariff just and reasonable.
Trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants in plaintiff's legal malpractice action because plaintiff had ample time to satisfy its evidentiary burden of producing an expert report but failed to act with due diligence and failed to supply sufficient admissible evidence to support each element of its professional negligence claim. Affirmed.
In this Rule 1925(a) opinion, the court reviewed its denial of defendant's motion to disqualify. Court sought affirmance.
The commonwealth court erred in concluding that communications exchanged between a commonwealth agency and a private consultant could be shielded from disclosure under the Right-to-Know Law's pre-decisional deliberations exception. The high court reversed in part and affirmed in part.
Cite as: Mercedes v. AVA Pork Products, Inc., 13-CV-3212, NYLJ 1202650732379, at *1 (EDNY, Decided April 8, 2014) 13-CV-3212 District Judge Joseph
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
5 Proven Steps to Accelerate Business Growth in a Crowded Legal Market
Brought to you by AllRize
Download Now
2024 Report: Digital Payments in Class Actions and Mass Torts + a Special Look at Industry Fraud
Brought to you by Western Alliance Bank, Member FDIC.
Download Now
Law Firm Office Space Perspective: Major U.S. Markets
Brought to you by JLL
Download Now
Expanding Your Practice Areas: How to Expand Offerings that Attract and Retain Clients
Brought to you by Filevine
Download Now