Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Morrison & Foerster LLP''

You can use to get even better search results
CURO Intermediate Holdings Corp. v. Sparrow Purchaser, LLC
Publication Date: 2024-06-18
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Accounting
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Thomas P. Will, Rachel R. Tunney, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Richard T. Marooney, Emma S. Nguyen, King & Spalding LLP, New York, NY; Jeffrey S. Rosenberg, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
For defendant: Nicholas J. Rohrer, Lakshmi A. Muthu, Alex B. Haims, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Christina Golden Ademola, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY; Robert W. May, Michael Komorowski, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for defendants.
Case number: 2023-0371-NAC

Court found no need for judicial interpretation where parties' dispute over working capital calculation merely involved a GAAP issue, and thus the dispute was properly resolved by an independent accountant under the parties' contractual dispute resolution provision.

Appellate Division First Department:May 13, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-05-13
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:May 9, 2024

April 01, 2024 | Law.com

Future of Litigation: Keeping Pace with the Rapid Rate of Change

Join this annual Future of Litigation webcast and hear from industry experts how technology, the economy, and changes to the law are transforming litigation strategies and be empowered  to thrive going forward.
5 minute read
EPAC Tech. Inc. v. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Publication Date: 2024-03-05
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department
Judge: Justice Jeffrey K. Oing
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Appellant-Respondent: Kevin H. Kim of counsel, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Albany.
For defendant: For Respondent-Appellant: Lena H. Hughes, J. Alexander Lawrence, Adam J. Hunt and Alexandra Avvocato of counsel, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York.
Case number: 653979/18

Company's Sale of Assets Is a Repudiation of Parties' Master Service Agreement

Appellate Division, First Department: February 26, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-02-26
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:February 22, 2024

Appellate Division, Second Department: February 23, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-02-23
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:February 21, 2024

November 02, 2023 | The American Lawyer

Big Law Firms Call on Top Law Schools to Condemn Anti-Israel Protests, Harassment

A group of more than 200 leading law firms implored law schools to reign in "anti-Semitic activities" on campus as Israel's response to the Oct. 7 attacks draws protest worldwide.
8 minute read
VMware, Inc. v. Wood
Publication Date: 2023-05-30
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Fioravanti
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Elena C. Norman, Elisabeth S. Bradley, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Arturo J. González, Shaelyn K. Dawson, Camille Framroze, Meredith L. Angueira, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiff.
For defendant: Kasey H. DeSantis, Nathan D. Barillo, Fox Rothschild LLP, Wilmington, DE; Neil A. Capobianco, Fox Rothschild LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case number: 2022-0820-PAF

Former employee lacked right to enforce repurchase option where his stock options and unvested stock were cancelled in connection with his employer's acquisition in exchange for the right to payments from the acquiring company that would terminate if the employee left the acquirer's employ.

Hatfield v. Walmart Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-04-27
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Products Liability
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Denise L. Cote
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs: Ashley C. Keller, Keller Postman LLC, Chicago, IL. Mikal C. Watts, Watts Guerra LLC, Millennium Park Plaza RFO, Guaynabo, Puerto Rico. The Lanier Law Firm, W. Mark Lanier, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant Walmart Inc.: Kristen Renee Fournier, King & Spalding LLP, New York, NY. Donald F. Zimmer, Jr., Ethan P. Davis, King & Spalding LLP, San Francisco, CA. Livia M. Kiser, King & Spalding LLP, Chicago, IL. Jeffrey S. Bucholtz, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC. For 22md3043 Defendant Sam's West, Inc.: Kristen Renee Fournier, King & Spalding LLP, New York, NY. Donald F. Zimmer, Jr., King & Spalding LLP, San Francisco, CA. Austin Evans, King & Spalding LLP, Austin, TX. For 22md3043 Defendant The Kroger Co.: Gregory E. Stone, Joseph A. Lara, Stone | Dean LLP, Woodland Hills, CA. For 22md3043 Defendant Rite Aid Corporation: David M. Katz, Karen G. Felter, Smith, Sovik, Kendrick & Sugnet, P.C., Syracuse, NY. For 22md3043 Defendants CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corp., and Walgreen Co.: Kristen L. Richer, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Los Angeles, CA. Sandra M. Ko, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Washington, DC. Nadine S. Kohane, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, New York, NY. For 22md3043 Defendants 7-Eleven, Inc., Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., and Family Dollar Stores, LLC: Lori B. Leskin, Mitchel Russell Stern, New York, NY. For 22md3043 Defendant Target Corporation: Julie Y. Park, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Diego, CA. For 22md3043 Defendants Safeway Inc. and Dolgencorp, LLC: Amanda L. Groves, Gregory A. Ellis, Winston & Strawn LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
Case number: 22 MC 3043

Tennessee's TCPA Not Exempt From Preemption Provision of Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

Takadu LTD., v. Innovyze, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-04-04
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Stephen B. Brauerman, Ronald P. Golden III, Bayard, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Robert P. Feinland, Jason J. Poulos, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Anne S. Gaza, Samantha G. Wilson, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael A. Jacobs, Morrison & Foerster LLP, San Francisco, CA; Kyle Mooney, Kyle D. Friedland, Morrison & Foerster LLP, New York, NY for defendant.
Case number: 21-291-RGA

The court ordered the parties to submit a proposed order consistent with the court's ruling on several disputed claim construction terms at issue in a patent litigation matter.

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT