0 results for ''Morvillo Abramowitz Grand''
Federal Issue Not Substantial Enough for Removal
Where diversity jurisdiction is lacking, removal to federal court typically requires the removed case to assert a federal cause of action. An exception exists, however, where removal is proper if the state cause of action asserted involves a substantial federal issue.Invitation Declined: Defenses Against Extradition to the United States
The arm of U.S. extradition law is long. Fortunately, practitioners have defenses at their disposal that they may raise in the requested country's courts to help either limit the scope of prosecution once extradition occurs, or to prevent it altogether.Partners in Westchester Accounting Firm Plead Guilty to Conspiracy to Defraud the IRS
Defendants were accused of scheming to conceal their clients' personal income and conceal wages paid to their clients' employees, reducing their payroll tax liability.Circuit Affirms Order Under Hague Convention Placing Children With Father in Third Country
View more book results for the query "'Morvillo Abramowitz Grand'"
'Farhy v. Commissioner': D.C. Circuit Reverses Win for Taxpayers
This article reviews the two decisions in 'Farhy v. Commissioner' and discusses the implications for determining the assessability of penalties going forward.When Is a Campaign Contribution a Bribe?
Campaign contributions can reflect genuine support for a candidate's positions and appreciation for ordinary aid to constituents. They can also become a bribe—that is, part of an illegal quid pro quo for political favors. What should the test be for deciding when a campaign contribution turns into a bribe?Appeals List & Motions List released on:April 23, 2024
'Martindell' Presumption Does Not Extend to Protective Orders in Arbitrations
In 'In re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated February 22, 2024, 2024', Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York confronted whether the Second Circuit's 'Martindell' test extends to protective orders issued by an arbitrator rather than by a district judge.Testing SCOTUS's 'Unmistakable Trend' in Shadow of Trump Prosecution
'Fischer' presents an interesting test of whether SCOTUS will continue its "unmistakable" message that courts should not assign federal criminal statutes a potentially wide-ranging scope "when a narrower reading is reasonable." To court watchers, the odds appear to be against affirmance. The case's potential impact on the Trump prosecution makes it all the more intriguing.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now