Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for ''Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox''

You can use to get even better search results
Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppman Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-03-28
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Timothy Devlin, Peter A. Mazur, Devlin Law Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE; W. Cook Alciati, Chad E. Ziegler, Gardella Grace, P.A., Washington, DC; Olivia E. Marbutt, Kent & Risley LLC, Alpharetta, GA for plaintiff.
For defendant: John W. Shaw, Karen E. Keller, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; J.C. Rozendaal, Byron L. Pickard, Michael E. Joffre, Anna G. Phillips, William H. Milliken, Robert E. Niemeier, Deirdre M. Wells, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC, Washington, DC; Jean Paul Y. Nagashima, Frost Brown Todd LLC, Washington, DC for defendants.
Case number: D70174

Court granted judgment as a matter of law as to noninfringement of patents where a plain reading of the patent limitations meant that the accused products were not substantially similar to the described invention and therefore could not infringe under the doctrine of equivalents.

Vanda Pharm., Inc. v. Teva Pharm. USA, Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-01-10
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Karen Jacobs, Derek J. Fahnestock, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Nicholas Groombridge, Eric Alan Stone, Josephine Young, Daniel J. Klein, Jennifer Rea Deneault, Michael F. Milea, Groombridge, Wu, Baughman & Stone LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Karen E. Keller, Nathan R. Hoeschen, Shaw Keller LLP, Wilmington, DE; J.C. Rozendaal, Deirdre M. Wells, William H. Milliken, Sasha Rao, Michael Bruns, Byron L. Pickard, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC, Washington, DC; Thomas J. Francella, Jr., Kaan Ekiner, Gregory F. Fischer, Cozen O’Connor, Wilmington, DE; Barry P. Golob, W. Blake Coblentz, Aaron S. Lukas, Kerry B. McTigue, Cozen O’Connor, Washington, DC; Keri L. Schaubert, Cozen O’Connor, New York, NY; Derek Gretkowski, Cozen O’Connor, Philadelphia, PA for defendants.
Case number: 18-651-CFC

Defendants' ANDA did not result in liability for infringement of patent claims that the court found invalid as obvious based on the combined teachings of the prior art.

TRUSTID, Inc. v. Next Caller, Inc.
Publication Date: 2022-01-18
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Adam W. Poff, Pilar G. Kraman, Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE; Michael D. Specht, Byron L. Pickard, Richard M. Bemben, Daniel S. Block, Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC for plaintiff.
For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Megan E. Dellinger, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Sarah Chapin Columbia, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Boston, MA; Ian B. Brooks, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Washington, DC; Jiaxiao Zhang, McDermott Will & Emery LLP, Irvine, CA for defendant.
Case number: D69685

Jury improperly issued a verdict for plaintiff on its Lanham Act false advertising claim, where plaintiff presented no evidence that customers were actually deceived by defendant's alleged false advertising.

The Sun Products Corporation, Plaintiff v. Jerry Bruch, High Point Ground and American Distribution Company, Defendants, 10 Civ. 4816 (SAS)
Publication Date: 2011-11-07
Practice Area: Torts
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District judge Shira A. Scheindlin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Mark Kenneth Silver, Esq., Michael J. Sullivan, Esq., Coughlin Duffy LLP, Middletown, NJ. David K. S. Cornwell, Esq., Byron Leroy Pickard, Esq., Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox PLLC, Washington, DC.
For defendant: For Defendant: Rick Aaron Steinberg, Esq., Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, New York, NY. Albert A. Ciardi, III, Esq., Kevin Gordon McDonald, Esq., Ciardi Ciardi & Astin, Philadelphia, PA.
Case number: 10 Civ. 4816 (SAS)

Cite as: The Sun Products Corp. v. Bruch, 10 Civ. 4816 (SAS), NYLJ 1202523199199, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 28, 2011)District judge Shira A. Schei

Hockerson-Halberstat, Inc. v. Avia Group International, Inc.
Publication Date: 2000-08-01
Practice Area: patents
Industry:
Court: Fed. Cir.
Judge: MAYER, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Richard E. Backus, et al.
For defendant: David K.S. Cornwell, et al.
Case number: no. 99-1505

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. ("HHI") sued Avia Group International, Inc. ("Avia") for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,259,792 ("the '792 patent"), covering an article of

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now

  • Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now

  • Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention

    Brought to you by NAVEX Global

    Download Now