0 results for 'Baker Botts'
A probate court found that a trustee breached her duties by transferring property from the trust to herself.
Sherman Act violation claim failed under the rule of reason where plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to define the relevant geographic or product market, but removal of plaintiff's products from a website, which hampered its ability to compete, was sufficient evidence of refusal to deal.
Appellant owned and operated a property management company and executed a series of contracts with Schnur and Anderson that essentially merged their businesses and formed a new entity to solicit new investors to purchase additional properties.
Receipt of notice of infringement only a day prior to the filing of the complaint was insufficient to charge defendant with pre-suit knowledge of the asserted patents.
Trial Court Erred in Finding LIFE Act Was Void Ab Initio Under Roe-Era Precedent That Controlled Prior to Recent Dobbs Ruling
The court denied defendants' motion to dismiss plaintiffs' derivative complaint which alleged that one defendant had made a sham offer to purchase another defendant's high vote stock to trigger a call right, which in turn resulted in significant monetary benefits to both defendants and harm to nominal defendant.
Starting in 2009, appellants, Carlo Civelli and his company Aster Capital, began providing loans to an oil company that ultimately ended in loan shares being transferred to privately-owned accounts of the CEO of the oil company.
Member controlling general partner in Master Limited Partnership was correct party to determine whether opinion of counsel to exercise call right was acceptable, meaning that general partner and related entities were exculpated from liability to limited partners due to the presumption of good faith in reliance on opinion of counsel imposed by the limited partnership agreement.
Special committee directors were dismissed from case challenging merger transaction, where plaintiff could not show that directors lacked independence from corporate controller or had engaged in willful dereliction of duty to the level of bad faith.
Lanham Act Counterclaim Dismissed; Defendant Is Not a 'Market Participant'
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
State Lawmakers Targeting Plastic Pollution in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Leveraging Technology to Increase Law Firm Profitability
Brought to you by Tranch
Download Now
2024 Report: State of AI in Legal
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now