Search Results

0 results for 'Baron & Budd'

You can use to get even better search results
Sillam v. Labaton Sucharow LLP
Publication Date: 2022-04-18
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes | Employment Litigation
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Colleen McMahon
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21 CV 6675

Knowledge, Assistance in Fraud Not Pleaded; 2015 Settlement Bars Misrepresentation Claim

Appellate Division, First Department: March 4, 2021
Publication Date: 2021-03-08
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, First Department: March 4, 2021

Funk v. Belneftekhim
Publication Date: 2020-09-28
Practice Area: Business Torts | Damages | Evidence | Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Brian Cogan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 14-CV-376

Concession Plaintiffs Sought Only Non-Economic Damages Bars Recovery on Remaining Claims

In re: Plavix Mktg., Sales Practices, & Prod. Liab. Litig.
Publication Date: 2020-09-14
Practice Area: Health Care Law
Industry: Federal Government | Pharmaceuticals | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Justice Bibas
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William H. Narwold and Mathew P. Jasinski (Motley Rice); W. Scott Simmer (Baron & Budd)
For defendant: Anand Agneshwar (Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer); Murad Hussain and Kirk Ogrosky (Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer); Gavin J. Rooner (Lowenstein Sandler)
Case number: 18-2472

FCA First-to-File Rule Did Not Bar Successor LLP from Entering Existing Qui Tam Action

Appellate Division, Second Department: February 13, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-02-15
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division, Second Department: February 13, 2019

Pure Diets India Ltd. v. Genco
Publication Date: 2019-02-08
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Cargo and Shipping
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Valerie Caproni
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 18-CV-3086

Privity Issues Noted in Partial Dismissal of Breach Action Over Sugar's Sale, Delivery

Biederman v. Brown
Publication Date: 2018-08-27
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Communications and Media
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Keyes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 01-17-00263-CV

Appellant, Christine Biederman, is a journalist and documentary film producer and sought to unseal a deposition taken in 1997 in a case filed by appellees, Beverly Brown, individually and as the personal representative of the estate of Glenn Brown, Sr. alleging various tort claims for Glenn's asbestos-related wrongful death, and Brown's attorneys, Baron & Budd, P.C.

V.W. v. Conway, 9:16-CV-1150
Publication Date: 2017-02-28
Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District
Judge: District Judge David N. Hurd
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Christopher T. Dunn, Esq., Mariko Hirose, Esq., Philip L. Desgranges, Esq., Aadhithi Padmanabhan, Esq., Mariana L. Kovel, Esq., of Counsel, New York Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY. Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Joshua T. Cotter, Esq., Samuel C. Young, Esq., Susan M. Young, Esq., of Counsel, Legal Services of Central New York, Syracuse, NY. Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Aimee Krause Stewart, Esq., of Counsel Sanford, Heisler LLP, Washington, D.C.
For defendant: Attorneys for defendants Eugene Conway, Esteban Gonzalez, and Kevin M. Brisson, John H. Mulroy Civic Center: Carol L. Rhinehart, Esq., of Counsel, Onondaga County Department of Law, Syracuse, NY. Attorneys for defendant Syracuse City School District: Jonathan B. Fellows, Esq., of Counsel, Bond, Schoeneck Law Firm, Syracuse, NY. John D. Hoggan, Jr., Esq., Ass't United States Attorney, of Counsel, Hon. Richard S. Hartunian, United States Attorney for the Northern District of New York, Albany, NY. Kyle Smiddie, Esq., Atticus Lee, Esq., of Counsel, United States Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Special Litigation Section, Washington, D.C. Attorneys for Amici Curiae: Lanessa L. Owens, Esq., of Counsel, NAACP — CNY Chapter Legal Committee, Syracuse, NY.
Case number: 9:16-CV-1150

Cite as: V.W. v. Conway, 9:16-CV-1150, NYLJ 1202779838280, at *1 (NDNY, Decided February 22, 2017) CASE NAME V.W., a min

In re Transient Occupancy Tax Cases
Publication Date: 2016-12-12
Practice Area:
Industry: Hospitality and Lodging
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Daniel F. Bamberg and Jon E. Taylor , Deputy City Attorneys; Kiesel Boucher Larson, William L. Larson, Thomas H. Peters, Paul R. Kiesel; Baron & Budd, Laura J. Baughman, Thomas M. Sims; McKool Smith, McKool Smith Hennigan, Steven D. Wolens, Gary Cruciani; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Irving H. Greines, Kent L. Richland, Cynthia E. Tobisman and David E. Hackett for Plaintiff and Appellant City of San Diego.
For defendant: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Darrel J. Hieber, Stacy R. Horth-Neubert and Daniel M. Rygorsky for Defendants and Respondents Priceline.com Incorporated and Travelweb LLC.
Case number:

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 13009 In re TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX CASES. No. S218400 In the Supreme

Matter of The People v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 451962/16
Publication Date: 2016-10-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court, New York County, IAS Part 61
Judge: Justice Barry R. Ostrager
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: The petitioner was represented by Manisha M. Sheth, Esq. John Oleske, Esq. and Katherine Milgram, Esq. from the Office of the New York Attorney General, New York, NY.
For defendant: The respondent Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP was represented by David Meister, Esq. and Jocelyn Strauber, Esq. of Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY. The respondent Exxon Mobil was represented by Theodore V. Wells, Jr., Esq. and Michele Hirshman, Esq. of Paul, Weiss, Rifkin, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 451962/16

Cite as: Matter of The People v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 451962/16, NYLJ 1202770998256, at *1 (Sup., NY, Decided October 25, 2016) CASENAME In the Matter o

Resources

  • 2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates

    Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®

    Download Now

  • AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage

    Brought to you by Ontra

    Download Now

  • Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2025 State Legislative Sessions

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now