0 results for 'Bursor'
Should It Be Left to the Plaintiffs Bar to Enforce Judicial Privacy Laws?
New Jersey's law, passed in response to the murder of a federal judge's son, allows potential plaintiffs, including judges, police and child abuse investigators, to assign their claims to others. Critics say the law meant to protect judges has created a potential windfall for plaintiffs lawyers.3rd Circuit Revives Class Action Against Bayer Over Benzene-Contaminated Products
“Since the contaminated products contained a defect that rendered them unusable, the products were worth less than their full purchase price,” Judge Cindy K. Chung said. “To hold otherwise would be to conclude that an unusable product is worth the same as a usable one—a conclusion that resists logic.”LinkedIn Hit With Wave of Health Data Claims Under California Privacy Law
All three cases, filed by Bursor & Fisher in the California Northern District Court and the California Superior Court in Santa Clara County, alleged wiretapping claims under the California Invasion of Privacy Act.Huggies Baby Wipes Accused of Containing Toxic Levels of 'Forever Chemicals'
Kimberly-Clark, the maker of Kleenex, was named in a consumer class action which alleges that its Huggies Simply Clean Fragrance Free baby wipes contain toxic "forever chemicals," despite representing the product as "simply clean" and using "gentle ingredients."View more book results for the query "Bursor "
New York Times, Athletic Media Hit With Data Privacy Class Action for Allegedly Sharing User Data
The claim alleged that the New York Times violated the federal Video Privacy Protection Act of 1988 and the New York Video Consumer Protection Act by sharing consumers' personally identifiable information with third parties. Counsel has not yet appeared for the defendants.Who Got the Work: Latham and MoFo Enter Appearances for OpenAI in Pending YouTubers' Class Action
The original complaint is one of three class actions—one against OpenAI, one against Google's parent company, Alphabet, and one against AI computing company Nvidia—filed last month by Bursor & Fisher in the Northern District of California alleging unjust enrichment.Google Slapped With Digital Privacy Class Action Over Use of Customer Service AI Product
Bursor & Fisher and the Simon Law Firm filed the complaint on Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. According to the claim, Google's use of the AI product, developed in 2022 to automate and fine-tune businesses' customer service interactions, violated Section 631 of the California Invasion of Privacy Act, which prohibits wiretapping. The plaintiff and class members could be awarded $5,000 per violation under CIPA.AI-Powered Software Company Invoca Hit With Digital Privacy Class Action
The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, contends that Invoca covertly intercepts and eavesdrops on these phone conversations, thereby violating California's "wiretapping" laws.Nvidia Slapped With Class Action by YouTube Creators for Using Content to Train AI Software
According to the suit, Santa Clara-based Nvidia, which designs the graphics processing units that power AI, illegally used "millions" of YouTube videos as training models for its "Cosmos" AI software, a deep-learning program that was designed to support such other Nvidia products as image generation and automated driving.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Yearly Roundup: Strategic Insights for Law Firm Decision Making
Brought to you by CARET Legal
Download Now
Lex Machina Contracts: Commercial Litigation Report 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
White Collar Investigation Practice: Global Expertise in Complex Investigations
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Criminal Division's Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs: September 2024 Updates Review
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now