Appellants were in the business of flipping houses and had a homebuyer send them a Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act demand letter.

The parties, both owners of horse farms, had a dispute about the purchase of a stallion and the leasing of a brood mare.

An attorney, who was accused of malpractice, could not rely upon the Texas Citizens Participation Act to have the case dismissed.

COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, EIGHTH DISTRICT, EL PASOTELESIS/PARKWOOD RETIREMENT I, LTD., TELESIS/PARKWOOD RETIREMENT, INC., TELESIS MANAGEM

SUPREME COURT OF TEXASCARDIAC PERFUSION SERVICES, INC. AND MICHAEL JOUBRAN, PETITIONERS, v. RANDALL HUGHES, RESPONDEN

SUPREME COURT OF TEXASFRANKIE SIMS, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL O SIMILARLY SITUATED; AND PATSY SIMS, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL O

SUPREME COURT OF TEXASFRANKIE SIMS, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL O SIMILARLY SITUATED; AND PATSY SIMS, ON BEHALF OF HERSELF AND ALL O

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause No. DC-10-8554-

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of TexasAfter listening to the oral arguments of the parties and closely examining the record, we conclude that the sanctioned