Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
L.R. v. Cherry Hill Bd. of Educ.
Publication Date: 2022-10-11
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: Education
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Mawla
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jamie Epstein and Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf, LLP (Jamie Epstein and Walter M. Luers, on the brief)
For defendant: Methfessel & Werbel (Eric Harrison, of counsel; Raina Marie Pitts, on the brief)
Case number: A-1819-20

Student Initials Constituted Personally Identifying Information That Qualified Document as a Student Record

Wolosky v. Fredon Twp.
Publication Date: 2022-06-13
Practice Area: Tax
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Hoffman
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Walter M. Luers argued the cause for appellant (Cohn, Lifland, Pearlman, Herrmann & Knopf, attorneys; Walter M. Luers, on the briefs)
For defendant: Robert B. McBriar (Schenck, Price, Smith & King, LLP, attorneys; William E. Hinkes, on the brief); Tara Ann St. Angelo (Gebhardt & Kiefer, PC, attorneys; Kelly A. Lichtenstein and Tara Ann St. Angelo, on the brief)
Case number: A-2832-19

Sanctions Award Vacated Where Motion Was Filed Two Years after Final Judgment without Extension of Time for Motion or Preservation of the Issue on Direct Appeal

C.E. v. Elizabeth Pub. Sch. Dist.
Publication Date: 2022-06-06
Practice Area: Public Records
Industry: Education | State and Local Government
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Mawla
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Robert F. Varady (La Corte, Bundy, Varady & Kinsella, attorneys; Robert F. Varady, of counsel and on the briefs; Christina M. DiPalo, on the briefs)
For defendant: Jamie Epstein (Jamie Epstein and Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP, attorneys; Walter M. Luers and Jamie Epstein, on the brief)
Case number: A-0173-20

OAL Settlement Agreements Involving School Districts Entered in Court Were Government Records Subject to Disclosure

Archer v. Defenders, Inc.
Publication Date: 2020-07-01
Practice Area: Labor Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Andrews
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Brian D. Long, Rigrodsky&Long, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Ted E. Trief, Shelly L. Friedland, EyalDror, Trief&Olk, New York, NY; Peter S. Pearlman, Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP, Saddle Brook, NJ; Macy D. Hanson, The Law Office of Macy D. Hanson, PLLC, Madison, MS for plaintiffs.
For defendant: J. Cory Falgowski, Burr & Forman LLP, Wilmington, DE; K. Bryance Metheny, Ronald W. Flowers, Jr., Martin E. Burke, H. Carlton Hilson, Burr & Forman LLP, Birmingham, AL for defendant.
Case number: D69030

Court declined to dismiss opt-in plaintiffs from wage and hour collective action on grounds of judicial estoppel for those plaintiffs' failures to disclose their claims on their bankruptcy petition, where those plaintiffs either retained the opportunity to amend their bankruptcy petitions or where any inference of bad faith was not strong enough to warrant the sanction of dismissal.

In re: Lamictal Direct Purchaser Antitrust Litig.
Publication Date: 2020-05-04
Practice Area: Antitrust
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Justice Ambro
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Daniel J. Bolan, Lindsay D. Breedlove, and Robin P. Sumner (Pepper Hamilton LLP); Joseph A. Fischetti and Gavin J. Rooney (Lowenstein Sandler LLP); Devora W. Allon, Jay P. Lefkowitz, and Dmitriy Tishyevich (Kirkland & Ellis LLP); Katherine M. Romano and Liza M. Walsh (Walsh Pizzi O’Reilly Falanga LLP)
For defendant: Elena K. Chan, Bruce E. Gerstein, Joseph Opper, and Noah Silverman (Garwin Gerstein & Fisher LLP); Caitlin G. Coslett and David F. Sorensen (Berger Montague); Matthew F. Gately and Peter S. Pearlman (Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP); Peter R. Kohn and Joseph T. Lukens (Faruqi & Faruqi LLP); Stuart E. Des Roches, Chris Letter, and Dan Chiorean (Odom & Des Roches LLC); Susan C. Segura, David C. Raphael, Jr., and Erin R. Leger (Smith Segura Raphael & Leger LLP); Russell Chorush and Allan Bullwinkel (Heim Payne & Chorush LLP)
Case number: 19-1655

Class Certification Granted in Error When Experts Disputed Whether Proof of Damages Required Individualized Inquiry

Cottrell v. Alcon Labs
Publication Date: 2017-10-30
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Class Actions | Consumer Protection
Industry: Consumer Products | Health Care
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Restrepo
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Leah M. Nicholls (Public Justice, P.C.); Richard S. Cornfeld (Law Office of Richard S. Cornfeld); John G. Simon and Kevin M. Carine (The Simon Law Firm, P.C.); Jeffrey W. Herrmann (Cohn Lifland Pearlman Herrmann & Knopf LLP); Brian S. Wolfman
For defendant:
Case number: 16-2015

District Court Erred in Dismissal of Consumer Protection Class Action Where Plaintiffs Pled Economic Loss Constituting Legally Protected Interest

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources