0 results for 'Cooch And Taylor, P.a.'
Supreme Court: Pro-Contract Delaware Shouldn't Override Forfeiture for Competition Provisions
Justice Gary F. Traynor's opinion, which emphasizes Delaware's strong deference to contract freedoms, remanded the case of former Cantor Fitzgerald partners to the Court of Chancery.Cigna's Alleged Use of AI In Denying Health Insurance Claims Fuels New Shareholder Lawsuit
This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.After Putting on Brakes for Class Actions, EV Derivative Suits Gear Up for 2023 Dates
Across the total of five federal and three Chancery matters pending in Delaware against EV companies, three are currently stayed entirely, on hold for separate securities class actions.After Class Actions Got the Brakes, EV Derivative Suits Gear Up for 2023 Dates
Across the total of five federal and three Chancery matters pending in Delaware against EV companies, three are currently stayed entirely, on hold for separate securities class actions.View more book results for the query "Cooch And Taylor, P.a."
'Obstructive Litigant': Laster Says AT&T Undercut Partners by Over $9M
Vice Chancellor Travis Laster blasted AT&T as "the most obstructive litigant" that he had ever seen, as a judge or a practicing lawyer. But he did not shift the burden of attorney fees to AT&T.Laster Bellwether Decision: AT&T Undercut Partners By Over $9M
Vice Chancellor Travis Laster blasted AT&T as "the most obstructive litigant" that he had ever seen, as a judge or a practicing lawyer. But he did not shift the burden of attorney fees to AT&T.Lawsuit Alleging SmileDirectClub Insider Transaction Nixed for Shareholders' Lack of Standing
Plaintiffs alleging an insider transaction weren't eligible to file a derivative suit involving the company's 2019 IPO because they were challenging terms of a deal agreed to before they purchased stock, despite owning shares before it took place.Lawsuit Alleging SmileDirectClub Insider Transaction Is Tossed for Shareholders' Lack of Standing
Plaintiffs alleging an insider transaction weren't eligible to file a derivative suit involving the company's 2019 IPO because they were challenging terms of a deal agreed to before they purchased stock, despite owning shares before it took place.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Yearly Roundup: Strategic Insights for Law Firm Decision Making
Brought to you by CARET Legal
Download Now
Lex Machina Contracts: Commercial Litigation Report 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
White Collar Investigation Practice: Global Expertise in Complex Investigations
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Criminal Division's Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs: September 2024 Updates Review
Brought to you by NAVEX Global
Download Now