Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Cruser And Mitchell'

You can use to get even better search results
May 31, 2024 | Daily Report Online

Jury Awards $1.8M, Not Rejected $60K, for Broken Pinky Finger

"If you have a good client and a corporate defendant that has not preserved evidence or has mishandled evidence, then a case with bad facts can become a strong case," claimed lead plaintiff counsel Drew Gilliland.
7 minute read
Appellate Division, First Department: November 30, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-11-30
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on: November 28, 2023

November 13, 2023 | New Jersey Law Journal

Associate Class of 2023

Congratulations to these associates, who joined their firms from Oct. 8, 2022, through Oct. 1, 2023.
53 minute read
November 09, 2023 | Daily Report Online

Lawyers Are Watching as Attorney Fees Slashed Over 'Value-Added' Calculation

"The problem with plaintiff's value-added model is that this calculation does not necessarily bear any relation to the amount of work actually expended in the case between the time of the settlement rejection and judgment," read Fulton County State Court Judge John R. Mather's order.
9 minute read
Carr v. Yim
Publication Date: 2023-11-09
Practice Area: Fee Disputes | Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Miller
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: J. Dwyer, (Dwyer Law Group), Atlanta, James Neuberger, (Neuberger Law, LLC), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Glenn Tornillo, (Cruser, Mitchell, Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston & Zimet, LLP), Peachtree Corners, Candice Bryant, (Cruser, Mitchell, Novitz, Sanchez, Gaston & Zimet, LLP), Norcross, for appellee.
Case number: A23A0687

Injured party in a negligence case was not entitled to attorney fees and litigation expenses because she did not serve a valid settlement offer in a renewal action after dismissing her original complaint

Law Journal Press | Digital Book California Premises Liability Law Authors: Jayme C. Long View this Book

View more book results for the query "Cruser And Mitchell"

October 02, 2023 | Daily Report Online

11th Circuit Set to Mull Questions of Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force in Central Ga. Civil Rights Case Appeal

"The deputies in this case made a conscious decision—they could either explain to [my client] why they needed him to get out of the car or they could scare the shit out of him. They chose to scare the shit out of him," plaintiff's counsel said.
5 minute read
September 25, 2023 | Daily Report Online

Baker Donelson Adds Three Laterals in Atlanta as Part of Firmwide Growth Strategy

The firm added a restructuring shareholder from Bryan Cave and the former managing shareholder of Atlanta boutique Davis, Matthews & Quigley.
3 minute read
Salter et al. v. St. Charles Homeowners Association, Inc. et al.
Publication Date: 2023-08-11
Practice Area: Attorney Compensation | Real Estate
Industry: Legal Services | Real Estate
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: C. DuBose, (DuBose Law Group LLC), Madison, Hal Wright, (Hal Wright Attorney at Law, LLC), Athens, Brittain Hunt, (Pulliam Law Group), Covington, for appellant.
For defendant: Sean Keenan, Sunshine Nasworthy, (Cruser Mitchell Novitz Sanchez Gaston & Zimet LLP), Norcross, for appellee.
Case number: A23A0620

Homeowners Association Had Authority to Prohibit Construction of Above-Ground Pool

Tisdale v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
Publication Date: 2023-08-08
Practice Area: Insurance Litigation
Industry: Transportation
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Scott Harrison, (Monge & Associates), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Jeffrey Brown, (Brown & Adams, LLC), Columbus, Brooke Sexton, Atlanta, for appellee; Kristin Yoder, (Cruser Mitchell Novitz Sanchez Gaston & Zimet LLP), Peachtree Corners for other party.
Case number: A23A0616

Court affirms summary judgment for an insurer in a car accident case because injured Uber driver had committed fraud to be accepted as a driver by Uber

June 29, 2023 | The Legal Intelligencer

Target's App-based Delivery Company Hit With Motor Vehicle Lawsuit

This suit was surfaced by Law.com Radar. Read the complaint here.
1 minute read

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now

  • Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus

    Brought to you by HaystackID

    Download Now

NEXT