Search Results

0 results for 'Davis Polk'

You can use to get even better search results
Abramowski v. Nuvei Corp.
Publication Date: 2024-10-29
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Derrick B. Farrell, Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP, Wilmington, DE; Javier Bleichmar, Evan A. Kubota, Thayne Stoddard, Bleichmar Fonti & Auld LLP, New York, NY for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Kevin M. Cohen, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Brian M. Burnovski, Matthew Cormack, Chui-Lai Cheung, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY for defendants.
Case number: 23-965-GBW

Plaintiffs were not entitled to relief where their earnout shares were subject to forfeiture upon a change in control below a certain per share price, and defendants' gaining majority control upon expiration of the tender offer triggered the forfeiture provision.

Penzo v. Con. Edison Co. of New York
Publication Date: 2024-08-23
Practice Area: Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 1:19-cv-07478

Jury Did Not Err in Finding in Plaintiff's Favor on Her NYCHRL Retaliation Claim

Litovich v. Bank of America Corp.
Publication Date: 2024-07-12
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Judges
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Investments and Investment Advisory
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Gregory Rapawy, Eliana Margo Pfeffer, on the brief, David C. Frederick, Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick, P.L.L.C., Washington, DC. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Christopher M. Burke, Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP, New York, NY. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Walter W. Noss, Kate Lv, Scott+Scott Attorneys at Law LLP, San Diego, CA. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: George A. Zelcs, Chad E. Bell, Ryan Z. Cortazar, Korein Tillery LLC, Chicago, IL. For Plaintiffs-Appellants: Glen E. Summers, Karma M. Giulianelli, Bartlit Beck LLP, Denver, CO.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Matthew J. Porpora, Jonathan S. Carter, on the brief, Richard C. Pepperman II, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Bank of America Corporation, BofA Securities, Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated: Adam S. Hakki, Richard F. Schwed, Shearman & Sterling LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Barclays Capital, Inc.: Barry G. Sher, Kevin P. Broughel, Paul Hastings LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellee Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC: Herbert S. Washer, Sheila C. Ramesh, Adam S. Mintz, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees JPMorgan Chase & Co. and J.P. Morgan Securities LLC: Robert D. Wick, John S. Playforth, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendant-Appellee NatWest Markets Securities Inc: Paul S. Mishkin, Adam G. Mehes, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY. For Defendants-Appellees Citigroup Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc.: Jay Kasner, Karen M. Lent, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY. For Defendant-Appellant Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.: John F. Terzaken, Adrienne V. Baxley, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Morgan Stanley, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC: Richard A. Rosen, Brad S. Karp, Susanna M. Buergel, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, NY, Kannon K. Shanmugam, Jane B. O'Brien, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Washington, DC. For Defendants-Appellees Wells Fargo & Co., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, and Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLC: Jayant W. Tambe, Laura W. Sawyer, Amanda L. Dollinger, Jones Day, New York, NY.
Case number: 21-2905

Judgment Vacated; Statute, Precedents Required Judge's Pre-Judgment Disqualification

Thomas v. The State
Publication Date: 2024-06-28
Practice Area: Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Georgia Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Bethel
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Howard Jarrett Weintraub, Sr., Benjamin Black Alper, (The Law Offices of Howard J. Weintraub, P.C.), Atlanta, Elizabeth Ann Brandenburg, (Law Firm of Shein & Brandenburg), Decatur, for appellant.
For defendant: Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Clint Christopher Malcolm, Meghan Hobbs Hill, Christopher M. Carr, Eric Christopher Peters, Michael Scott Carlson, (Department of Law), Atlanta, Fani T. Willis, Kevin Christopher Armstrong, Michael Scott Carlson, (Fulton County District Attorney’s Office), Atlanta, Jeffrey Michael Hawkins, (Clayton County District Attorney’s Office), Jonesboro, for appellee.
Case number: S24A0174

Court affirms reconsideration of evidence suppression order in light of new trial grant, noting that end-of-term rule applies to final judgments but not to interlocutory evidentiary rulings

BitGo Holdings, Inc. v. Galaxy Digital Holdings, Ltd.
Publication Date: 2024-06-03
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Financial Services and Banking | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Supreme Court
Judge: Justice Traynor
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: A. Thompson Bayliss, Michael A. Barlow, Eliezer Y. Feinstein, Abrams & Bayliss LLP, Wilmington, DE; R. Brian Timmons, David M. Grable, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA; David Cooper, Deborah K. Brown, Nathan Goralnik, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY for appellants.
For defendant: Bradley R. Aronstam, S. Michael Sirkin, Ross Aronstam & Moritz LLP, Wilmington, DE; Andrew Ditchfield, Brian M. Burnovski, Pascale Bibi, Kyra Macy Kaufman, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY; Neal Kumar Katyal, Nathaniel A.G. Zelinsky, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, D.C., Dennis H. Tracey, III, Hogan Lovells US LLP, New York, NY for appellees.
Case number: 2022-0808

Court remanded for reconsideration of interpretation of contractual requirement using extrinsic evidence where both parties proffered reasonable interpretations of the provision.

Chin v. New York City Dep't of Corrections
Publication Date: 2024-05-28
Practice Area: Employment Compliance | Employment Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Ann M. Donnelly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 23-CV-5268

DOC, as Agency, Cannot Be Sued; Claims Against Proper Defendant City of New York Stand

Blanton v. Red Desert Enter., LLC
Publication Date: 2024-05-20
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Procedure | Real Estate
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Womack
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 02-23-00191-CV

The lawsuit involves two pieces of property, the contested property and the adjacent property. The contested property was transferred to various entities, eventually leading to appellees.

Luna v. State of Texas
Publication Date: 2024-04-08
Practice Area: Criminal Appeals | Criminal Law
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Trotter
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 11-22-00039-CR

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon and causing serious bodily injury to his wife, and capital murder for causing the death of his wife's unborn child.

Appellate Division, First Department: March 28, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-03-28
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:March 26, 2024

Williams v. Binance
Publication Date: 2024-03-15
Practice Area: Securities Litigation
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Alison J. Nathan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellants: David Coon, on the brief, Jordan Goldstein, Selendy Gay Elsberg PLLC, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees: Daniel J. Schwartz, Marie Killmond, on the brief, James P. Rouhandeh, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, New York, NY.
Case number: 22-972

Plaintiffs Adequately Allege Transactions on Binance Exchange Were Domestic Transactions

Resources

  • Data Management and Analytics: The Key to Success for Legal Operations

    Brought to you by DiliTrust

    Download Now

  • Small Law Firm Playbook: The Expert's Guide to Getting the Most Out of Legal Software

    Brought to you by PracticePanther

    Download Now

  • Strong & Hanni Solves Storage Woes--Learn How You Can, Too

    Brought to you by Filevine

    Download Now

  • Meeting the Requirements of California's SB 553: Workplace Violence Prevention

    Brought to you by NAVEX Global

    Download Now