0 results for 'Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz'
$120M Medical Malpractice Verdict Said To Be Westchester's Largest
Rubinowitz represented a client who suffered irreversible brain damage as a result of what he said was a hospital's delay in diagnosing a basilar artery stroke.Using Professional Ethics to Discredit Opposing Expert Witness Testimony
All attorneys must abide by the Rules of Professional Conduct, but many fail to realize that similar requirements apply to most individuals providing expert testimony. These standards can provide ammunition for impeachment when expert witnesses fail to abide by the ethical requirements of their field.Trial Lawyers 'Master Series' CLE Webinar Panel Boasts 200-Plus Years' Experience
NYSTLA President Thomas P. Valet said the event was "an unprecedented coming together" of legal talent.As 'Nuclear' Verdicts Rise in New York, Report Says More 'Thermonuclear' Awards Are on Horizon
Reasons that make New York a likely target include its scaffold law, which accounts for nearly half of all nuclear verdicts, the report said.New 'Speaking Agents' Law Overrides New York's Prohibition On Employees' Out-of-Court Statements
New York State Trial Lawyers Association leaders say the changes allow juries to hear statements based on their relevance to the matter at hand, not how high declarants rank them on the corporate ladder.View more book results for the query "Gair, Gair, Conason, Steigman, Mackauf, Bloom & Rubinowitz"
First Department Appeals Court Halves Jury's $60M Pain-and-Suffering Award—But It's Still a Record
A state appeals court has awarded $29 million—the largest pain-and-suffering damages amount approved by an appellate court in state history—to a former Manhattan public high school student burned over much of his body during a class experiment gone wrong, though the court did cut the jury verdict of $60 million roughly in half.Trust and Reliance: A Powerful Theme for Cross
The trust and reliance that we place in those who make crucial decisions about our health and safety often goes unchallenged until something goes wrong. But when something bad does happen, the concepts of trust and reliance can form the basis for the successful prosecution or defense of a claim. In this edition of their Trial Advocacy column, Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan explore proper trial techniques that can be used to develop and explore the adequacy or inadequacy of those major decisions.Cross-Examination: Exploring the Process That Leads to the Choice
In every case, someone makes a choice that gives rise to the claim. For the attorney conducting a cross-examination of the person or persons who made the choice, dissecting the thought process that led to that choice will provide fodder for cross-examination and lead to success in the courtroom. In this edition of their Trial Advocacy column, Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan explore Question and Answer techniques for eliciting useful responses.Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
The 2024 Benchmark of Ethical Culture Report
Brought to you by LRN
Download Now
State Lawmakers Targeting Plastic Pollution in 2024
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Leveraging Technology to Increase Law Firm Profitability
Brought to you by Tranch
Download Now
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now