Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Irell & Manella'

You can use to get even better search results
Intel Corp. v. Fortress Inv. Group, LLC
Publication Date: 2021-10-13
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Zurn
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jack B. Blumenfeld, Kenneth J. Nachbar, Ryan D. Stottmann, Elizabeth A. Mullin, Miranda N. Gilbert, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
For defendant: Jeffrey L. Moyer, Kelly E. Farnan, Blake Rohrbacher, Valerie A. Caras, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Brian E. Farnan, Michael J. Farnan, Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Ben Hattenbach, Iian D. Jablon, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, CA for defendants.
Case number: D69572

The court dismissed this action for declaratory relief because plaintiff had an adequate remedy at law in other pending patent lawsuits.

VLSI Tech. LLC v. Intel Corp.
Publication Date: 2018-11-21
Practice Area: Intellectual Property | Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Connolly
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Brian E. Farnan and Michael J. Farman of Farnan LLP, Wilmington, DE; Morgan Chu, Ben Hattenbach, Amy E. Proctor, Dominik Slusarczyk and Charlotte J. Wen of Irell & Manella LLP, Boston, MA, attorneys for plaintiff
For defendant: Jack B. Blumenfeld and Jeremy A. Tigan of Morris, Nichols Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE Wil-liam F. Lee and Louis W. Tompros of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP, Palo Alto, CA, Mark D. Selwyn and Amanda L Major of Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, at-torneys for defendant.
Case number: D68365

Plaintiff's forum choice was entitled to paramount consideration, and little overlap existed between this case and another pending patent matter between the same parties in another jurisdiction.

Parrish v. Latham and Watkins
Publication Date: 2017-08-10
Practice Area:
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Eagan Avenatti, Michael J. Avenatti, Scott H. Sims; Panish, Shea & Boyle, Brian J. Panish, Adam K. Shea, Kevin R. Boyle; Esner, Chang & Boyer and Stuart B. Esner for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
For defendant: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr., Julian W. Poon, Jeremy S. Smith; McKool Smith Hennigan, J. Michael Hennigan and Michael Swartz for Defendants and Respondents.
Case number:

Denial of defendant's summary judgment motion trigger interim adverse judgment rule despite later finding of plaintiffs' bad faith (Kruger, J.)

In Re Appraisal of Goodcents Holdings, Inc., DEFAX Case No. D67766 (Del.Ch. June 7, 2017), Montgomery-Reeves, V.C. (17 pages).
Publication Date: 2017-06-21
Practice Area:
Industry: Financial Services and Banking
Court: Delaware Court of Chancery
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D67766

Preferred stockholders not entitled to payment of liquidation preference upon merger where company's certificate of incorporation merely provided them a blocking vote, and only voided that blocking

Raindance Tech., Inc. v. 10X Genomics, Inc., DEFAX Case No. D67743 (D.Del. May 17, 2017), Andrews, U.S.D.J. (6 pages).
Publication Date: 2017-05-24
Practice Area:
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D67743

Claim term of "polymerase chain reaction" was broad enough to encompass multiple sub-types of PCR including Rando

Fowler Packing Company, Inc. v. Lanier
Publication Date: 2016-12-20
Practice Area:
Industry: Agriculture
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding Before: Ronald M. Gould, Richard R. Clifton, and Paul J. Watford, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David A. Schwarz (argued) and Michael D. Harbour, Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
For defendant: Thomas Patton (argued), Deputy Attorney General; Mark R. Beckington, Supervising Deputy Attorney General; Douglas J. Woods, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General; Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, California; for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 16-16236

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 13321 FOWLER PACKING COMPANY, INC.; GERAWAN FARMING, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
Publication Date: 2016-11-22
Practice Area:
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Charles R. Breyer, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David Nimmer (argued), Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, California; Stuart McKinley Paynter (argued), Jennifer L. Murray, and Sara Willingham, The Paynter Law Firm PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Robert B. Carey and Leonard W. Aragon, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Seattle, Washington; Walter H. Sargent, Walter H. Sargent P.C., Colorado Springs, Colorado; Peter S. Menell, Berkley, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Eric H. MacMichael (argued), Tia A. Sherringham, R. Adam Lauridsen, Steven A. Hirsch, and Susan J. Harriman, Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 14-15298

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 12272 ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois Citizen, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court (Gerawan Farming, Inc.)
Publication Date: 2016-10-26
Practice Area:
Industry: State and Local Government | Agriculture
Court: C.A. 3rd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Paul M. Starkey and Todd M. Ratshin for Petitioner.
For defendant: None for Respondent. Irell & Manella and David A. Schwarz; Barsamian & Mood and Ronald H. Barsamian; Michael P. Mallery for Real Party in Interest.
Case number: No. C081373

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 11325 AGRICULTURAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIO

Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
Publication Date: 2016-05-10
Practice Area:
Industry: Agriculture
Court: C.A. 5th
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Georgeson and Belardinelli, C. Russell Georgeson; Irell & Manella, David A. Schwarz, Bruce A. Wessel and Josh Geller for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Douglas J. Woods, Assistant Attorney General, Tamar Pachter and Nelson R. Richards, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.
Case number: No. F069896 No. F070287

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 4877 GERAWAN FARMING, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. AGRICULTURAL

Fry v. City of Los Angeles (Board of Fire and Police Pension Commissioners of the Los Angeles Fire and Police Pensions)
Publication Date: 2016-03-08
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Rosen Bien Galvan & Grunfeld, Ernest Galvan, Margot Mendelson, Jenny S. Yelin for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
For defendant: Renne Sloan Holtzman Sakai, Arthur A. Hartinger, Linda M. Ross, Jennifer L. Nock, Kevin P. McLaughlin; Meyers Nave, Harry W.R. Chamberlain II, Anya J. Freedman for Defendant and Appellant.
Case number: No. B259791

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 2554 JACK FRY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF LOS ANG

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 2024 Report: State of AI in Legal

    Brought to you by Ironclad

    Download Now

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now