Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Kazan Mcclain Satterley Greenwood'

You can use to get even better search results
Barden v. Brenntag N. Am., Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-10-16
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Consumer Products | Manufacturing
Court: Superior Court
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Peter G. Verniero (McCarter & English, LLP, and Sills Cummis & Gross, PC, attorneys; Peter G. Verniero, John C. Garde, and Michael S. Carucci, on the briefs)
For defendant: Denyse Clancy (Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood); (Szaferman, Lakind, Blumstein & Blader, PC, and Cohen, Placitella & Roth, PC; Denyse Clancy, and Chris J. Panatier, Simon Greenstone Panatier, PC, attorneys); Moshe Maimon, Denyse Clancy, Christopher Placitella, Chris J. Panatier, and Robert E. Lytle, on the brief)
Case number: A-0047-20, A-0048-20, A-0049-20, & A-0050-20

Trial Court Erred in Admitting Expert Testimony Without Rule 104 Hearing to Test Reliability of Data and Methodology

Lanzo v. Cyprus Amax Minerals Co.
Publication Date: 2021-05-10
Practice Area: Products Liability
Industry: Consumer Products | Manufacturing | Mining and Resources
Court: Appellate Division
Judge: Judge Yannotti
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Roman Martinez (Latham & Watkins LLP) of the New York and District of Columbia bars, admitted pro hac vice (Chasan, Lamparello, Mallon & Cappuzzo, PC, Roman Martinez, and Elana Nightingale Dawson (Latham & Watkins LLP) of the Illinois and District of Columbia bars, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys; Cindy Nan Vogelman, Roman Martinez and Elana Nightingale Dawson, on the briefs); E. Joshua Rosenkranz (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice (McCarter & English LLP, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Robert M. Loeb (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, Paul David Meyer (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP) of the California bar , admitted pro hac vice, and Naomi J. Scotten (Orrick, Herrington & E. Joshua Rosenkranz (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice (McCarter & English LLP, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Robert M. Loeb (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP) of the District of Columbia bar, admitted pro hac vice, Paul David Meyer (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP) of the California bar , admitted pro hac vice, and Naomi J. Scotten (Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP) of the New York, Virginia, and District of Columbia bars, admitted pro hac vice, attorneys; John C. Garde, E. Joshua Rosenkranz, Robert M. Loeb, Paul David Meyer, Naomi J. Scotten, and Evan M. Rose, on the briefs)
For defendant: Denyse Clancy (Kazan McClain Satterley & Greenwood) of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice (Levy Konigsberg LLP, and Denyse Clancy, attorneys; Moshe Maimon and Denyse Clancy, on the briefs)
Case number: A-5711-17; A-5717-17

Products Liability Reversed Where Trial Court Admitted Expert Testimony Based on Data and Theories Not Generally Accepted by Scientific Community

City of Pasadena v. Superior Court (Jauregui)
Publication Date: 2017-06-28
Practice Area:
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Foley & Mansfeld, Keith M. Ameele, Joseph V. Macha, M. Amadea Groseclose, Margaret I. Johnson; Office of the Pasadena City Attorney, Michele Beal Bagneris, City Attorney, and John Nam, Deputy City Attorney, for Petitioner.
For defendant: No appearance for Respondent. Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood, Joseph Satterley, Denyse F. Clancy, and Ian A. Rivamonte, for Real Parties in Interest.
Case number: No. B280805

Claimants' cause of action for asbestos injury accrued upon date of discovery (Manella, J.)

Kesner v. Superior Court (Pneumo Abex, LLC)
Publication Date: 2016-12-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Ca. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Weitz & Luxenberg, Benno Ashrafi, Cindy Saxey, Josiah W. Parker; Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood and Ted W. Pelletier for Petitioner and for Plaintiff and Appellant Cecelia Kesner.
For defendant: Horvitz & Levy, Lisa Perrochet, Robert H. Wright, Curt Cutting; Brydon Hugo & Parker, Hugo Parker, Edward R. Hugo, James C. Parker and Jeffrey Kaufman for Real Party in Interest and for Defendant and Respondent Pneumo Abex, LLC.
Case number:

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 12641 CECELIA KESNER, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA C

Scapa Dryer Fabrics Inc. v. Knight
Publication Date: 2016-07-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Blackwell, Keith R.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: William D. Barwick Duane Morris LLC, M. Elizabeth O'Neill, H. Lane Young II Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young LLP, Atlanta, J. D. Smith, Gainesville, and Robert B. Gilbreath Hawkins Parnell Thackston Young LLP, Dallas, TX, for appellant.
For defendant: Amicus Appellant: William V. Custer IV Bryan Cave LLP, Atlanta, Mark W. Wortham Hall Booth Smith PC, Columbus, and William Anderson Crowell Morning LLP, Washington, DC. Robert C. Buck Buck Law Firm, Atlanta, and Denyse F. Clancy Kazan, McClain, Satterley Greenwood, Oakland, CA, for appellees. Amicus Appellees: J. Phillip Boston, Athens.
Case number: S15G1278

The trial court abused its discretion in admitting certain expert testimony in a toxic tort suit, because the opinion the expert offered did not fit the legal standard for

Brodeur v. Atlas Entertainment, Inc.
Publication Date: 2016-06-28
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood, David McClain, Ted W. Pelletier, Ian A. Rivamonte; Law Offices of Leon Friedman and Leon Friedman for Plaintiff and Respondent.
For defendant: Leopold, Petrich & Smith, Louis P. Petrich, Elizabeth L. Schilken and Eva S. Neuberg for Defendants and Appellants.
Case number: No. B263379

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 6890 PAUL BRODEUR, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. ATLAS ENTERTAINMENT,

Rondon v. Hennessy Industries, Inc.
Publication Date: 2016-06-08
Practice Area:
Industry: Manufacturing
Court: C.A. 1st
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Appellant: Greenwood, Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Ted W. Pelletier and Michael T. Stewart
For defendant: Counsel for Respondent: Gordon & Rees, Don Willenburg and Mitchell B. Malachowski
Case number: No. A141686 & A142411

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 5917 RENEE RONDON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENNESSY INDUSTRIES,

Johnson v. United States Steel Corporation
Publication Date: 2015-09-02
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 1st
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiffs and Appellants: KAZAN, McCLAIN, SATTERLEY & GREENWOOD, Ted W. Pelletier and Michael T. Stewart
For defendant: Counsel for Defendant and Respondent: HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP, Barry J. Thompson, David W. Skaar, and Catherine E. Stetson, THE CAIRONE LAW FIRM PLLC, Matt Cairone
Case number: No. A142485

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 9922 DAVID JOHNSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. UNITED STAT

Hellam v. Crane Co.
Publication Date: 2015-08-21
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 1st
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff and Respondent: Kazan, McClain, Satterley & Greenwood, Francis E. Fernandez, Ted W. Pelletier, Ian A. Rivamonte
For defendant: Counsel for Defendant and Appellant: K&L Gates LLP, Michele C. Barnes, Daniel W. Fox, Nicholas P. Vari, Michael J. Ross, Michael J. Sechler
Case number: No. A140326

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 9332 JONATHAN HELLAM, as Successor in Interest, etc., Plaintiff and Respondent, v.p class=

Scott v. Ford Motor Company
Publication Date: 2014-03-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: C.A. 1st
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Kazan, McClain, Satterley, Lyons, Greenwood & Oberman, Joseph D. Satterley, Dianna Lyons, Justin A. Bosl, Ted W. Pelletier, and Michael T. Stewart for Plaintiffs and Appellants Patrick Scott and Sharon Scott.
For defendant: Nixon Peabody, Ronald Frank Lopez, David A. Pereda, Ross M. Petty; Munger, Tolles & Olson, Daniel P. Collins, Nicholas C. Soltman; Dykema Gossett, and Eric C. Tew for Defendant and Appellant Ford Motor Company. The Product Liability Advisory Council, Inc., Hugh F. Young, Jr.; Snell & Wilmer and Mary-Christine Sungaila as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Appellant Ford Motor Company.
Case number: No. A137975

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 3353 PATRICK SCOTT et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. FORD MOTOR

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • Document Review Challenges: Strategies for Law Firm Litigation Professionals in 2024

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • From Burnout to Breakthrough: How Technology Enhances Legal Wellness

    Brought to you by Nuix

    Download Now

  • The 2024 Benchmark of Ethical Culture Report

    Brought to you by LRN

    Download Now

  • State Lawmakers Targeting Plastic Pollution in 2024

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now