Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Keker, Van Nest & Peters'

You can use to get even better search results
InterMune, Inc. v. Harkonen
Publication Date: 2024-08-13
Practice Area: Insurance Law
Industry: Biotechnology | Insurance | Pharmaceuticals
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Karen A. Jacobs, Megan W. Cascio, Courtney Kurz, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Laurie Carr Mims, Benjamin D. Rothstein, Candice Mai Khanh Nguyen, Melissa Cornell, Catherine C. Porto, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Michael A. Weidinger, Megan Ix Brison, Pinckney, Weidinger, Urban & Joyce LLC, Wilmington, DE; Elizabeth Sandza, Richard Sandza, Sandza Law, PLLC, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case number: 2021-0694-NAC

Officer was obligated to reimburse corporation for advancement costs issued in connection with officer's criminal prosecution for actions taken in the course of his duties when that prosecution culminated in his conviction, precluding him from asserting good faith entitlement to indemnification under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

InterMune, Inc. v. Harkonen
Publication Date: 2023-05-23
Practice Area: Business Torts
Industry: Biotechnology
Court: Court of Chancery
Judge: Vice Chancellor Cook
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Karen A. Jacobs, Megan W. Cascio, Courtney Kurz, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Laurie Carr Mims, Benjamin D. Rothstein, Candice Mai Khanh Nguyen, Melissa Cornell, Catherine C. Porto, Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP, San Francisco, CA for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Michael A. Weidinger, Megan Ix Brison, Pinckney, Weidinger, Urban & Joyce LLC, Wilmington, DE; Elizabeth Sandza, Richard W. Sandza, Sandza Law, PLLC, Washington, DC for defendant.
Case number: 2021-0694-NAC

Corporate officer was not entitled to statutory indemnification from company where officer was convicted of federal wire fraud, which included a finding that the officer acted in bad faith, and where a presidential pardon did not have the effect of eliminating the conviction.

Davies v. Benov
Publication Date: 2017-05-17
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Michael J. Seng, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Ronald M. Gould, and Consuelo M. Callahan, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Cody Harris (argued), Philip J. Tassin, Steven P. Ragland, and Elliot R. Peters, Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California, for Petitioner-Appellant.
For defendant: Gregory T. Broderick (argued), Assistant United States Attorney; Camil A. Skipper, Appellate Chief; Phillip A. Talbert, United States Attorney; United States Attorney's Office, Sacramento, California; for Respondent-Appellee.
Case number: No. 15-17256

Waiver provision in plea agreement precluded collateral attack on sentence (Gould, J.)

Tavares v. Whitehouse
Publication Date: 2017-03-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding Before: M. Margaret McKeown, Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Richard C. Tallman, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Andrew W. Stroud (argued) and Landon D. Bailey, Hanson Bridgett LLP, Sacramento, California; Fred J. Hiestand, Esq., Sacramento, California; for Petitioners-Appellants.
For defendant: Elliot R. Peters (argued), Steven A. Hirsch, Jo W. Golub, and Jesse Basbaum, Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California, for Respondents-Appellees.
Case number: No. 14-15814

Cite as 17 C.D.O.S. 2332 JESSICA TAVARES; DOLLY SUEHEAD; DONNA CAESAR; BARBARA SUEHEAD, Petitioners-Appellants,

Antonick v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
Publication Date: 2016-11-22
Practice Area:
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Charles R. Breyer, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Andrew J. Kleinfeld, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and Andrew D. Hurwitz, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David Nimmer (argued), Irell & Manella LLP, Los Angeles, California; Stuart McKinley Paynter (argued), Jennifer L. Murray, and Sara Willingham, The Paynter Law Firm PLLC, Washington, D.C.; Robert B. Carey and Leonard W. Aragon, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Steve W. Berman, Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, Seattle, Washington; Walter H. Sargent, Walter H. Sargent P.C., Colorado Springs, Colorado; Peter S. Menell, Berkley, California; for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Eric H. MacMichael (argued), Tia A. Sherringham, R. Adam Lauridsen, Steven A. Hirsch, and Susan J. Harriman, Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 14-15298

Cite as 16 C.D.O.S. 12272 ROBIN ANTONICK, an Illinois Citizen, Plaintiff-Appellant, v.

In re Fisker Auto. Holdings Inc. S'holder Litig., DeFAX Case No. D66977 (D. Del. Sept. 9, 2015) Robinson, J. (52 pages).
Publication Date: 2015-09-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D66977

In re Fisker Auto. Holdings Inc. S'holder Litig., DeFAX Case No. D66977 (D. Del. Sept. 9, 2015) Robinson, J. (52 pages).
Publication Date: 2015-09-30
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: D66977

United States v. Katakis
Publication Date: 2015-08-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: William B. Shubb, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Marsha S. Berzon and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges and Raner C. Collins,* Chief District Judge.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Adam D. Chandler (argued), Attorney; William J. Baer, Assistant Attorney General; Brent Snyder, Deputy Assistant Attorney General; Anna Tryon Pletcher, Tai S. Milder, May Lee Heye, Kelsey C. Linnett, Kristen C. Limarzi, and James Joseph Fredricks, Attorneys, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, D.C., for Plaintiff-Appellant.
For defendant: Elliot R. Peters (argued), Steven A. Hirsch, Jennifer A. Huber, and Elizabeth K. McCloskey, Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendant-Appellee.
Case number: No. 14-10283

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 9816 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANDREW B. K

Eclectic Properties East LLC v. Marcus & Millichap Company
Publication Date: 2014-05-07
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Ronald M. Whyte, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: J. Clifford Wallace and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges, and Paul C. Huck, Senior District Judge.*
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Susan Alexander (argued), Sanford Svetcov, and Andrew S. Love, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Francisco, California; David J. George and Bailie L. Heikkinen, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, Boca Raton, Florida; and Bonny E. Sweeney and Phong L. Tran, Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP, San Diego, California, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
For defendant: Daniel Purcell (argued), John W. Keker, and Dan Jackson, Keker & Van Nest LLP, San Francisco, California, for Defendants-Appellees The Marcus & Millichap Company, Sovereign Investment Company, Sovereign Scranton LLC, Sovereign CC, LLC, and Sovereign JF, LLC.
Case number: No. 12-16526

Cite as 14 C.D.O.S. 5052 ECLECTIC PROPERTIES EAST, LLC, a California limited liability company; RISOLA FAMILY LP II, a Florida limited partnership; CE

Chevron Corporation v. Donziger, 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK)
Publication Date: 2012-01-10
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Randy M. Mastro, Andrea E. Neuman, Scott A. Edelman, William E. Thompson, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP.
For defendant: Attorneys for Donziger Defendants: John W. Keker, Elliot R. Peters, Jan Nielsen Little, Keker & Van Nest, LLP. Julio C. Gomez, Gomez, Attorney at Law LLC Attorneys for Defendants Hugo Gerardo Camacho Naranjo and Javier Piaguaje Payaguaje: Tyler G. Doyle, Craig Smyser, Larry R. Veselka, Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P. Stuart A. Krause, Benjamin H. Green, Zeichner Ellman & Krause LLP. Attorneys for Stratus Defendants: Joe L. Silver, Martin D. Beier, Silver & Deboskey *1
Case number: 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK)

Cite as: Chevron Corporation v. Donziger, 11 Civ. 0691 (LAK), NYLJ 1202537779000, at *1 (SDNY, Decided January 6, 2012)District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates

    Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®

    Download Now

  • AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage

    Brought to you by Ontra

    Download Now

  • Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2025 State Legislative Sessions

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now