Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Novartis Pharma AG
Publication Date: 2024-03-26
Practice Area: Antitrust | Business Torts
Industry: Pharmaceuticals
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Barrington D. Parker
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Joshua Halpern, Elizabeth S. Weiswasser, Eric S. Hochstadt, & Anish R. Desai, on the brief, Adam Banks, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York, NY & Washington, D.C.
For defendant: For Defendants-Appellees Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Technology LLC, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.: Ian Simmons, Lisa Pensabene, Stephen J. McIntyre, & Melissa C. Cassel, on the brief, William Jay, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, Washington, D.C., New York, NY, Los Angeles, CA & San Francisco, CA. Benjamin T. Horton & Julianne M. Hartzell, on the brief, Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellee Vetter Pharma International GmbH. Anisha S. Dasgupta & Joel Marcus, on the brief, Matthew M. Hoffman, Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C., and Jonathan S. Kanter, Daniel E. Haar, Nickolai G. Levin, & Andrew N. DeLaney, on the brief, United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, D.C., Amici Curiae in Support of Neither Party.
Case number: 22-0427-cv

Anti-VEGF Medications in Vials, Pre-Filled Syringes Compete in Different Product Markets

BearBox LLC v. Lancium LLC
Publication Date: 2023-03-21
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce | Electronics | Software
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin T. Horton, John R. Labbe, Raymond R. Ricordati III, Chelsea M. Murray, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Chad. S.C. Stover, Mark C. Nelson, Darrick J. Hooker, Adam M. Kaufmann, Dana Amato Sarros, David M. Lisch, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: 21-534-GBW

Court declined to correct inventorship of patent where plaintiffs could not show that they had conceived of various claims in the patent and had not communicated other claims to defendants before defendants had independently conceived of those claims and reduced them to practice.

BearBox LLC v. Lancium LLC
Publication Date: 2023-02-28
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Software | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin T. Horton, John R. Labbe, Raymond R. Ricordati III, Chelsea M. Murray, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun, LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Chad S.C. Stover, Mark C. Nelson, Darrick J. Hooker, Adam M. Kaufmann, Dana Amato Sarros, David M. Lisch, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: 21-534-GBW

Conversion claim was preempted by federal patent law where relief on the claim would be predicated on resolution of the dispute over ownership of the technology disclosed in the patent-in-suit.

Bearbox LLC v. Lancium LLC
Publication Date: 2022-11-22
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Williams
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Andrew C. Mayo, Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Benjamin T. Horton, John R. Labbe, Raymond R. Ricordati III, Chelsea M. Murray, Marshall, Gerstein & Borun LLP, Chicago, IL for plaintiffs.
For defendant: Chad S.C. Stover, Mark C. Nelson, Darrick J. Hooker, Adam M. Kaufmann, Dana Amato Sarros, David M. Lisch, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Wilmington, DE for defendants.
Case number: 21-534-GBW

The court issued a ruling defining the claim terms of a patent consistent with the arguments made by defendant LLC.

Kroy IP Holdings, LLC v. Groupon Inc.
Publication Date: 2019-01-02
Practice Area: Patent Litigation
Industry: E-Commerce | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: U.S. District Court of Delaware
Judge: District Judge Noreika
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: David E. Moore, Bindu A. Palapura and Stephanie E. O'Byrne of Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Wilmington, DE; Jonathan K. Waldrop, Darcy L. Jones, Marcus A. Barber, John W. Downing, Heather S. Kim and Jack Shaw of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP , Redwood Shores, CA; Hershy Stern and Rodney R. Miller of Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP, New York, NY for plaintiff.
For defendant: Steven J. Balick and Andrew C. Mayo of Ashby & Geddes, Wilmington, DE; Thomas L. Duston and Tron Y. Fun of Marshall, Gerstein and Borun, LLP, Chicago, IL for defendants.
Case number: D68409

Plaintiff's patent claims involved abstract ideas, but the court denied defendant's motion to dismiss because unresolved factual issues existed regarding the nature of the claims.

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources