Search Results

0 results for 'Provost Umphrey Law Firm'

You can use to get even better search results
Sullo v. Kubosh
Publication Date: 2021-01-18
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Civil Rights | Legal Malpractice
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Justice Keyes
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 01-18-00418-CV

An interlocutory appeal was taken from three consolidated lawsuits filed by the Carter parties against the Kuboshes for violation of a civil statute prohibiting barratry.

In Re Kubosh, 01-16-00417-CV (TexApp Dist 05/16/2017)
Publication Date: 2017-05-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals of Texas, First District
Judge: EVELYN V. KEYES, JUSTICE
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 01-16-00417-CV

Relators Paul Kubosh and Felix Kubosh operate a law firm (Paul Kubosh) and bail bond agency (Felix Kubosh). Several dozen plaintiffs had sued relators for barratry in three separate actions after th

Michael D. Filer v. Keystone Corporation
Publication Date: 2015-05-01
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION, FOURTH DEPARTMENT
Judge: Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Lindley, And Whalen, JJ.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 14-01446

Goldberg Segalla LLP, Buffalo (Albert J. D'Aquino Of Counsel), For Defendant- ant Keystone Corporation.Damon Morey LLP, Buffalo (Hedwig M. Auletta Of Counsel), For Defendants-

DAVIS D. GILLIS, DAVE RICHARDSON, AND BARRY CLAUSS, Appellants v. PROVOST & UMPHREY LAW FIRM, LLP, AND JOE KENDALL, Appellees
Publication Date: 2015-01-14
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLAS
Judge: ROBERT M. FILLMORE
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 05-13-00892-CV

COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS, FIFTH DISTRICT, DALLASDAVIS D. GILLIS, DAVE RICHARDSON, AND BARRY CLAUSS, Appellants v. PROVOST

NATIONAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, L.P., MICHAEL PLANK AND RUSSELL PLANK, PETITIONERS, v. GORDON WESTERGREN, RESPONDENT
Publication Date: 2015-01-09
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 13-0801

SUPREME COURT OF TEXASNATIONAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS, L.P., MICHAEL PLANK AND RUSSELL PLANK, PETITIONERS, v. GORDON WESTERGREN

Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Gaither
Publication Date: 2007-07-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Ruffin, John H.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Randall J. Butterfield King & Spalding, Jennifer G. Cooper Gambrell & Stolz LLP, Anthony L. Cochran Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Atlanta, C. Wilson DuBose Winkler & DuBose, Madison, and Mary Parsons Fulkerson, Feder & Wollam LLP, Houston,Texas, for appellant.
For defendant: . John D. Steel Matthews & Steel, Atlanta, Brian H. Barr Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Echsner & Proctor PA, Pensacola, Fla., Grant Kaiser The Kaiser Firm, John E. Williams Jr. Williams Baily Law Firm, Houston, Texas, and Walter Umphrey Provost Umphrey Law Firm, Beaumont, Texas, for appellees. Other party representation: James L. Hollis Balch & Bingham LLP, Charles B. Marsh, Kenneth M. Barre Swift, Currie, McGhee & Heirs, John M. Hawkins Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, Robert B. Hocutt Nall & Miller, Robert C. Buck Childers, Buck & Schlueter LLP, Stevan A. Miller Drew Eckl & Farnham LLP, Charles J. Cole Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney LLP, Andrew M. Gibson Alston & Bird, Atlanta, C. Ronald Ellington, Athens, and Mikal Watts The Watts Law Firm LLP, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Case number: A07A0177

The claims of over 350 plaintiffs in ten law suits against defendant electric companies' for their alleged injures as the result of exposure to welding fumes were improperly joined under O.C.G.A. §

Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Gaither
Publication Date: 2007-07-27
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Ruffin, John H.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Randall J. Butterfield King & Spalding, Jennifer G. Cooper Gambrell & Stolz LLP, Anthony L. Cochran Chilivis, Cochran, Larkins & Bever, Atlanta, C. Wilson DuBose Winkler & DuBose, Madison, and Mary Parsons Fulkerson, Feder & Wollam LLP, Houston, Texas, for appellant.
For defendant: . John D. Steel Matthews & Steel, Atlanta, Brian H. Barr Levin, Papantonio, Thomas, Mitchell, Echsner & Proctor PA, Pensacola, Fla., Grant Kaiser The Kaiser Firm, John E. Williams Jr. Williams Baily Law Firm, Houston, Texas, and Walter Umphrey Provost Umphrey Law Firm, Beaumont, Texas, for appellees. Other party representation: James L. Hollis Balch & Bingham LLP, Charles B. Marsh, Kenneth M. Barre Swift, Currie, McGhee & Heirs, John M. Hawkins Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, Robert B. Hocutt Nall & Miller, Robert C. Buck Childers, Buck & Schlueter LLP, Stevan A. Miller Drew Eckl & Farnham LLP, Charles J. Cole Owen, Gleaton, Egan, Jones & Sweeney LLP, Andrew M. Gibson Alston & Bird, Atlanta, C. Ronald Ellington, Athens, and Mikal Watts The Watts Law Firm LLP, Corpus Christi, Texas.
Case number: A07A0177

The claims of over 350 plaintiffs in ten law suits against defendant electric companies' for their alleged injures as the result of exposure to welding fumes were improperly joined under O.C.G.A. §

In re Dole Food Company, Inc.
Publication Date: 2008-06-13
Practice Area: Civil Practice
Industry:
Court: Tex. App. Dist. 9
Judge: Per curiam.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 09-08-056 CV

Original ProceedingSubmitted on April 10, 2008OPINIONIn this mandamus proceeding, Dole Food Company, Inc. and James Teater challenge the overruling of their motion to transfer venue in a suit

In re JPMorgan Chase Co. Shareholder Derivative Litigation, 08 Civ. 974
Publication Date: 2008-09-29
Practice Area: Business Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District
Judge: Denise Cote
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 08 Civ. 974

District Judge Denise Cote U.S. DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Appearances: For Plaintiff Robert L. Garber Deborah Clark-Wei

KMC Leasing, Inc. v. Rockwell Standard Corp.
Publication Date: 2000-07-06
Practice Area: civil practice : state | class actions
Industry:
Court: Okla. Sup. Ct.
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. 92,344

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. WINCHESTER, J. This matter concerns the motion of appellants, KMC Leasing, Inc., Westak of Oregon, Inc., B&B T

Resources