Golf course operator did not owe duty to person injured by stolen golf cart where a stolen cart did not constitute "exceptional circumstances" and the operator did not have notice of the risk of theft where it had only suffered one prior theft attempt under completely different circumstances than the theft of the stolen cart at issue.

Healthcare power of attorney granting attorney-in-fact authority to contract for healthcare services on behalf of the principal was sufficient to confer authority for attorney-in-fact to sign arbitration agreement as part of principal's admission paperwork for skilled nursing facility.

Property owner owed no duty or liability to motor vehicle accident victim struck by an intoxicated motorist off-premises after owner found the motorist sleeping in his parked vehicle on the property in an apparent state of intoxication and woke him.

Court dismissed case for failure to prosecute where plaintiff had willfully or recklessly failed to actively litigate the case for several years despite repeated extensions and warnings from the court.

Plan of reorganization establishing sexual abuse settlement trust affirmed where non-consensual releases of claims against non-debtors, who were affiliates of debtors, fell within "related to" jurisdiction since the non-debtors' viability as going concerns was necessary to the success of debtors' reorganization.

Defective construction claims by condominium association were timely filed where receiver who previously controlled condo was appointed solely to complete construction and limit the losses of the mortgagee, such that the limitations period did not start running until the association of ow ners took control.

Summary judgment in motor vehicle accident case denied where the evidence created genuine issues of material fact as to defendant's speed prior to the accident and the visibility of both parties to each other leading up to the collision, such that plaintiff could not yet be found indisputably more negligent than defendant.

The court found that the prevailing party, when an underinsured motorist claim resulted in a plaintiff's verdict but at an amount less than the damages paid by the tortfeasor, was the defendant insurance company who issued the UIM policy.

Motion to amend to add bad faith claim denied as futile where the parties had engaged in good faith litigation about the availability of coverage under the policy.

Insurer was entitled to summary judgment on the issue of coverage for a collapsed pedestrian bridge, but factual issues existed regarding coverage for a damaged retaining wall.