Search Results

0 results for 'Smith Currie Hancock'

You can use to get even better search results
Beasley et al. v. Georgia Department of Corrections
Publication Date: 2021-08-05
Practice Area: Personal Injury
Industry:
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Dillard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Tracey Pruiett, Joseph Dinardo, Stephen Reams, (Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Christopher Carr, Kathleen Pacious, Loretta Pinkston-Pope, (Senior Assistant Attorney General), Atlanta, Kathleen Turnipseed, Angela Cusimano, (Georgia Department of Law), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A21A0593

Assault-and-Battery Exception to GTCA's General Waiver of State's Immunity Bars 'Public Nuisance' Claims Against GDOC

Appellate Division,Second Department:August 13, 2019
Publication Date: 2019-08-15
Practice Area: Appellate Division Activity | Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Motion List & Order on Application
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appellate Division,Second Department:August 13, 2019

HH&L Electric, Inc. v. Hebbard Electric, Inc.
Publication Date: 2017-11-22
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Contracts | Evidence
Industry: Construction
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Doyle
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: John Long (Tucker, Everitt, Long, Brewton & Lanier), Augusta, for appellant.
For defendant: Joseph Staak (Smith, Currie & Hancock), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A17A0957

The trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment to defendant in a breach of contract action that was based on a disagreement as to the amount of "profit" parties were to split in their joint venture because the trial court based that decision on disputed opinion testimony.

In re Big Thorne Project and 2008 Tongass Forest Plan
Publication Date: 2017-05-23
Practice Area:
Industry: Mining and Resources
Court: 9th Cir.
Judge: Ralph R. Beistline, Senior District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain and Ronald M. Gould, Circuit Judges.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Holly Anne Harris (argued), Thomas S. Waldo, and Eric P. Jorgensen, Earthjustice, Juneau, Alaska, for Plaintiffs-Appellants/Plaintiffs.
For defendant: Allen M. Brabender (argued), Emily Polachek, and David Glazer, Attorneys; John C. Cruden, Assistant Attorney General; Environment & Natural Resources Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; James Ustasiewski and Kate Baldridge, Office of General Counsel, United States Department of Agriculture; for Defendants-Appellees.
Case number: No. 15-35232 No. 15-35233 No. 15-35244

National Forest Management Act required protection of "viable" population only (Kozinski, J.)

City of Atlanta v. Kovalcik
Publication Date: 2014-12-02
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Laura Burton City of Atlanta Law Department, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Andrew Rogers Deitch & Rogers LLC, and Robin Clark, Atlanta, for appellees. Other party representation: Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, George Shingler, Ashley Wilson Shingler Lewis LLC, James Bidgood, Philip Fortune Smith Currie & Hancock LLP, Melissa Kahren, and Stephen Schatz Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers LLP, Atlanta.
Case number: A14A0768

Under the somewhat peculiar factual circumstances of the case, the absence of lighting at the newly reconfigured intersection could be considered as evidence on the issue of whether the intersection

Department of Transp. v. Kovalcik
Publication Date: 2014-08-07
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Samuel S. Olens, Attorney General, George Shingler, and Ashley Wilson Shingler Lewis LLC, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Andrew Rogers Deitch & Rogers LLC, and Robin Clark, Atlanta, for appellees. Other party representation: Akua Coppock, Laura Burton City of Atlanta Law Dep't, Melissa Kahren, Stephen Schatz Swift, Currie, McGhee & Hiers LLP, James Bidgood, and Philip Fortune Smith, Currie & Hancock, Atlanta.
Case number: A14A0694

To the extent that the plaintiffs' claim against the DOT was based on negligent approval of defective construction plans or failure to deny approval of defective construction plans, it was barred by

Coffee Iron Works v. QORE Inc.
Publication Date: 2013-06-12
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Doyle, Sara L.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Brent Savage and Kathryn Pinckney Savage & Turner PC, Savannah, for appellant.
For defendant: . Joseph Staak Smith, Currie & Hancock, Atlanta, for appellee. Other party representation: Kent Stair and Cheryl Shaw Carlock Copeland Semler & Stair LLP, Atlanta.
Case number: A13A0613; A13A0616; A13A0617

The doctrine of collateral estoppel supported the trial court's grants of summary judgment to the defendant in the plaintiffs' actions for damages the defendant's erroneous analytical work allegedly

Newell Recycling of Atlanta Inc. v. Jordan Jones & Goulding Inc.
Publication Date: 2012-08-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: McFadden, Christopher J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Steven Hall and H. Fielder Martin Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Kent Smith, Robert Fleming and Joseph Staak Smith, Currie, & Hancock LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A12A1031

The parties' written documents lacked the element of consideration, thus the entire contract was considered in parol and the 4-year, rather than 6-year, statute of limitation ap

Atlantic Station LLC v. Vratsinas Constr. Co.
Publication Date: 2010-12-31
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Court of Appeals
Judge: Barnes, Anne Elizabeth
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Michael H. Shanlever and John I. Spangler III Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Kent P. Smith and Stephen G. Joy Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A10A1134

The appellant waived its right to stay arbitration in a dispute over $4.5M in invoices rendered from 1999-2004 in connection with development consulting services provided in connection with the cons

Newell Recycling of Atlanta Inc. v. Jordan Jones and Goulding
Publication Date: 2010-12-10
Practice Area:
Industry:
Court: Supreme Court
Judge: Melton, Harold D.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: H. Fielder Martin, Jason A. Cooper Shapiro, Fussell, Wedge & Martin LLP and Stephen G. Lowe Adorno & Yoss, Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Robert O. Fleming Jr., Joseph C. Staak and Kent P. Smith Smith, Currie & Hancock LLP, Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: S09G1974

O.C.G.A. § 9-3-24's 6-year statute of limitation was controlling, since the statute on all simple contracts in writing is six

Resources

  • 2024 Report: State of AI in Legal

    Brought to you by Ironclad

    Download Now

  • Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review

    Brought to you by Integreon

    Download Now

  • Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024

    Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.

    Download Now

  • The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now