0 results for 'Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein'
Court granted judgment as a matter of law as to noninfringement of patents where a plain reading of the patent limitations meant that the accused products were not substantially similar to the described invention and therefore could not infringe under the doctrine of equivalents.
Defendants' ANDA did not result in liability for infringement of patent claims that the court found invalid as obvious based on the combined teachings of the prior art.
Jury improperly issued a verdict for plaintiff on its Lanham Act false advertising claim, where plaintiff presented no evidence that customers were actually deceived by defendant's alleged false advertising.
Cite as: The Sun Products Corp. v. Bruch, 10 Civ. 4816 (SAS), NYLJ 1202523199199, at *1 (SDNY, Decided October 28, 2011)District judge Shira A. Schei
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc. ("HHI") sued Avia Group International, Inc. ("Avia") for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,259,792 ("the '792 patent"), covering an article of
Trending Stories
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
Leveraging Technology to Increase Law Firm Profitability
Brought to you by Tranch
Download Now
2024 Report: State of AI in Legal
Brought to you by Ironclad
Download Now
Blueprint for Successful Second Request Document Review
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now