Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Stinson LLP'

You can use to get even better search results
Data Logger Solutions, LLC v. Digi SmartSense, LLC
Publication Date: 2024-10-01
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Electronics | Retail
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Krista M. Reale, Margolis Edelstein, Wilmington, DE; Herbert W. Mondros, Rigrodsky Law, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Glenn Ricketti, Margolis Edelstein, Philadelphia, PA for plaintiff.
For defendant: David J. Soldo, K. Tyler O’Connell, Barnaby Grzaslewicz, Samuel E. Bashman, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric C. Liebeler, Kevin Kitchen, Stinson LLP, Minneapolis, MN for defendant.
Case number: N20C-10-121 EMD

Court granted remittitur where expert testimony could only reasonably support a lower future damages award than granted by the jury.

Roytlender v. D. Malek Realty LLC
Publication Date: 2024-09-13
Practice Area: Damages | Employment Litigation | Wage and Hour Litigation
Industry: Real Estate
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorney for Plaintiff and Counter Defendant Maya Roytlender: Paul L. Dashefsky, Esq., Smithtown, NY.
For defendant: Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaims D. Malek Realty, LLC, Malek Management Corporation, StaffPro, Inc., David Malek, and Michael Malek: Jonathan D. Farrell, Esq., Daniel Frank Carrascal, Esq., Mark A. Radi, Esq., Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Breitstone LLP, Mineola, NY.
Case number: 21-CV-00052

Defendants Entitled to Prejudgment Interest After Insurance Pay Out Excluded From Damages

Short v. City of Rochester
Publication Date: 2024-09-10
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Wrongful Death
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, U.S. - WDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark W. Pedersen
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Madeline More, Esq., Ian Daniel Eppler, Esq., David Kleban, Esq., Henry R. Ricardo, Esq., Patterson, Belknap, Webb & Tyler, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant: Patrick B. Naylon, Esq., City of Rochester, Department of Law, Rochester, NY.
Case number: 22-CV-6263

Stay of Discovery Is Warranted While Summary Judgment Is Decided in Police Shooting Case

Clark v. Hanley
Publication Date: 2024-01-04
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Civil Rights
Industry: State and Local Government
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff-Appellant: Andrew D. Silverman, Jennifer M. Keighley, on the brief, Alexandra Bursak, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, New York, NY.
For defendant: For Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc., The Amicus Project at UConn Law, Just Detention International, and Center for Constitutional Rights, as amici curiae: Sasha Buchert and Richard Saenz, Lambda Legal, Washington D.C. and New York, NY. For Amicus Project at UConn Law, as amicus curiae: Richard Luedeman, Assistant Clinical Professor of Law, UConn School of Law, Hartford, CT. For Defendants-Appellees: Wilson T. Carroll, on the brief, Stuart M. Katz, Cohen and Wolf, P.C., Bridgeport, CT, on behalf of Defendant-Appellee Thomas Hanley. For William Tong, Attorney General, Connecticut Office of the Attorney General, Hartford, CT, on behalf of Defendants-Appellees Kevin Manley, Peter Murphy, Kimberly Weir, Roberto Quiros, Jane and John Does 1-9: Zenobia G. Graham-Days, Assistant Attorney General.
Case number: 22-302

Circuit Upholds Denial of Tolling, Dismissal of Inmate's Rights Action as Time-Barred

Data Logger Solutions, LLC v. Digi Smartsense, LLC
Publication Date: 2023-09-04
Practice Area: Contracts
Industry: Manufacturing | Retail | Technology Media and Telecom
Court: Delaware Superior Court
Judge: Judge Davis
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Krista M. Reale, Margolis Edelstein, Wilmington, DE; Herbert W. Mondros, Rigrodsky Law, P.A. Wilmington, DE for plaintiff.
For defendant: K. Tyler O’Connell, Barnaby Grzaslewicz, Samuel E. Bashman, Morris James LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric C. Liebeler, Kevin Kitchen, Connor Shaull, Stinson LLP, Minneapolis, MN for defendants.
Case number: N20C-10-121-EMD

Concluding that the facts alleged for the breach of contract claim in the original complaint were similar to those pled in the claim for tortious interference in the amended complaint, the court denied defendant's motion to dismiss finding that defendant was provided sufficient notice of the tortious interference claim to relate back to the original complaint.

United States v. United States Sugar Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-08-07
Practice Area: Mergers and Acquisitions
Industry: Federal Government | Food and Beverage | Manufacturing
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Judge: Judge Porter
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Jonathan S. Kanter, Doha Mekki, Maggie Goodlander, David B. Lawrence, Daniel E. Haar, Nikolai G. Levin, Peter M. Bozzo, Brian Hanna, Jonathan Y. Mincer, U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division, Washington, DC for plaintiff-appellant.
For defendant: Melissa Arbus Sherry, Amanda P. Reeves, Lindsey S. Champlin, David L. Johnson, Charles S. Dameron, Latham & Watkins LLP, Washington, DC; Lawrence E. Buterman, Latham & Watkins LLP, New York, NY; Christopher S. Yates, Latham & Watkins LLP, San Francisco, CA; Jack B. Blumenfeld, Brian P. Egan, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP, Wilmington, DE; Timothy G. Cameron, Peter T. Barbur, David R. Marriott, Daniel K. Zach, Michael K. Zaken, Lindsey J. Timlin, Hannah L. Dwyer, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, New York, NY; Amanda L. Wait, Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, Washington, DC; Kelly E. Farnan, Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A., Wilmington, DE; Peter J. Schwingler, Stinson LLP, Minneapolis, MN; Daniel K. Hogan, Hogan McDaniel, Wilmington, DE for defendant-appellees.
Case number: 22-2806

Rather than employ the hypothetical monopolist test analysis for determining product market under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, the Third Circuit affirmed the District Court's analysis using the actual market for refined sugar as the product market definition.

Delpiano v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
Publication Date: 2023-05-29
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Real Estate | Tax
Industry: Real Estate
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Judge Phipps
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Andrew Stevens, (Stevens, Stevens & Oliver, LLC), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Gregory Krivo, (McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC), Roswell, John Sullivan, (Burr & Forman, LLP), Atlanta, for appellee.
Case number: A23A0564

Prior Property Owner Lacked Standing to Challenge Lender's Suit to Reform Security Deed

Azzil Granite Materials LLC v. Canadian Pac. Ry. Corp.
Publication Date: 2023-05-24
Practice Area: Transportation
Industry: Transportation
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Attorneys for Plaintiff: Carl Judah Schaerf, Esq., Cynthia A. Murray, Esq., Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, New York, NY. Attorneys for Plaintiff: Edward Justin Sholinsky, Esq., Ralph G. Wellington, Esq., Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Philadelphia, PA.
For defendant: Attorney for Defendants Canadian Pacific Railway Corporation, and Delaware & Hudson Railway Company: David F Rifkind, Esq., Stinson LLP, Washington, DC. Attorney for Defendants Canadian Pacific Railway Corporation, and Delaware & Hudson Railway Company: Joshua Poertner, Esq., Stinson LLP, Minneapolis, MN. Attorney for Defendants Canadian Pacific Railway Corporation, Delaware & Hudson Railway Company, and New York and Atlantic Railway: Kieran M. Corcoran, Esq., Stinson LLP, New York, NY. Attorney for Defendants New York and Atlantic Railway: Kyle George Kunst, Esq., Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP, New York, NY. Attorney for Defendants New York and Atlantic Railway: William A Mullins, Esq., Baker & Miller, PLLC, Washington, DC.
Case number: 20-CV-2381

Breach of Contract Claims Against Railway Companies Are Preempted by Carmack Amendment

Appellate Division, First Department: May 22, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-05-22
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on: May 18, 2023

Appellate Term, Second Department: May 22, 2023
Publication Date: 2023-05-22
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Term, Second Department, Decision & Orders
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Decision & Orders on Motions decided between: April 20 & 21, 2023

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources

  • 2024 Trends Report Mid-Year Special Edition: Update on Outside Counsel Billing Rates

    Brought to you by LexisNexis® CounselLink®

    Download Now

  • AI in Private Equity: A Guide for Gaining an Early Advantage

    Brought to you by Ontra

    Download Now

  • Why Are So Many Law Firms Suddenly Embracing Digital Transformation?

    Brought to you by AllRize

    Download Now

  • 2025 State Legislative Sessions

    Brought to you by LexisNexis®

    Download Now