Search Results

0 results for 'Swanson Martin Bell'

You can use to get even better search results
Appellate Division, Second Department: July19, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-07-19
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:July 17, 2024

Appellate Division, First Department: March 7, 2024
Publication Date: 2024-03-07
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, First Department, Appeals & Motions
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Appeals & Motions List released on:March 5, 2024

Villareal v. City of Laredo
Publication Date: 2024-02-05
Practice Area: Civil Rights | Constitutional Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Jones
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-40359

In this en banc case, the court revisited whether a journalist may be prosecuted for making public non-public information acquired by reporting (that is, asking sources for information).

Vans Inc. v. MSCHF Product Studio Inc.
Publication Date: 2023-12-12
Practice Area: Trademarks
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Judge: Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiffs-Appellees: Philip A. Goldstein, McGuire Woods LLP, New York, NY; Tanya L. Greene, McGuire Woods LLP, Los Angeles, CA, on the brief, Lucy Jewett Wheatley, McGuire Woods LLP, Richmond, VA.
For defendant: For Defendant-Appellant: Megan K. Bannigan, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, New York, NY; William D. Patterson, Swanson, Martin & Bell, LLP, Chicago IL, on the brief, David H. Bernstein. For Amicus Curiae Daniel Arsham in Support of Defendant-Appellant: Vivek Jayaram, Jayaram Law Group, Chicago, IL. For Amici Curiae Emmanuel Perrotin, Jean-Paul Engelen in Support of Defendant-Appellant: Ronald D. Coleman, Dhillon Law Group Inc., Newark, NJ. For Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Professors in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Mark A. Lemley, Lex Lumina PLLC, New York, NY. For Amici Curiae American Apparel & Footwear Association, Footwear Distributors & Retailers of America, Council of Fashion Designers of America, Inc., and Accessories Council in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Zachary D. Cohen, Rachel W. Adams, on the brief, John P. O'Herron, ThompsonMcMullan, P.C., Richmond, VA. For Amicus Curiae Nike, Inc., in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees: Tamar Y. Duvdevani, DLA Piper LLP (US), New York, NY, on the brief, Stanley Panikowski, DLA Piper LLP (US), San Diego, CA. For Amicus Curiae International Trademark Association in Support of neither party: Martin Schwimmer, Leason Ellis LLP, White Plains, NY; David Donahue, Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C., New York, NY, on the brief, Vijay K. Toke, Rimon P.C., San Francisco, CA. For Amici Curiae Authors Alliance, Mason Rothschild, Alfred Steiner in Support of neither party: Mark P. McKenna, Christopher J. Sprigman, Rebecca Tushnet, on the brief, Rhett O. Millsaps II, Lex Lumina PLLC, New York, NY.
Case number: 22-1006

Confusion on Source of Wavy Baby Shoe Likely; Vans Likely to Prevail on Infringement Claim

Johnson v. Barnett Outdoors LLC
Publication Date: 2023-11-29
Practice Area: Civil Procedure
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York, U.S. - WDNY
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark W. Pedersen
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Andrew J. Connelly, Esq., Andrews, Bernstein, Maranto & Nicotra PLLC, Buffalo, NY.
For defendant: For Defendant: Christopher T. Sheean, Esq., Swanson, Martin & Bell, LLP, Chicago, IL.
Case number: 21-CV-6316

Complaint Is Denied Amendment; Correct Standard Not Used, Good Cause Not Shown

Whitehead et al. v. Green as the Parent of Green, Deceased Minor et al.
Publication Date: 2022-11-09
Practice Area: Premises Liability | Wrongful Death
Industry: Consumer Products
Court: Georgia Court of Appeals
Judge: Presiding Judge Dillard
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Thomas Brennan, (Fain, Major, & Brennan, P.C.), Atlanta, Matthew Dowling, (State of Georgia Department of Law), Atlanta, William Mitchell, (Cruser Mitchell Novitz Sanchez Gaston & Zimet LLP), Norcross, Reynolds Pitts, (Jonathan R. Brockman, P.C.), Atlanta, for appellant.
For defendant: Anna Cross, (The Cross Firm LLC), Decatur, Matthew Wilson, Adam Princenthal, (Princenthal & May, LLC), Sandy Springs, Darren Summerville, Jonathan Flack, (The Summerville Firm), Atlanta, Meredith Kincaid, (Cross Kincaid), Decatur, for appellee; Claire Williamson, Brad Parrott, (Hudson Lambert Parrott Walker LLC), Atlanta, for other party.
Case number: A22A0797

Court reverses denials of defendants' summary judgment motions in a wrongful death case following the drowning death of a four-year old

Appellate Division, Second Department: November 4, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-11-04
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:November 2, 2022

Appellate Division,Second Department: August 22, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-08-22
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Hand Down List
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:August 17, 2022

Appellate Division,Second Department: August 19, 2022
Publication Date: 2022-08-19
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Criminal Appeals
Industry:
Court: Appellate Division, Second Department, Handdown
Judge: Unsigned
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: DOCKET

Handdown List released on:August 17, 2022

Oliver v. Arnold
Publication Date: 2021-12-27
Practice Area: Civil Appeals | Constitutional Law | Education Law
Industry:
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Judge: Circuit Judge Dennis
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 20-20215

An en banc appellate panel, that was asked to rehear a politically motivated first amendment case, chose not to rehear the case.

Resources