Sign in to follow
Search Results

0 results for 'Watt Tieder Hoffar'

You can use to get even better search results
Rubin v. Mangan
Publication Date: 2021-11-18
Practice Area: Civil Procedure | Legal Malpractice
Industry: Legal Services
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, U.S. - EDNY
Judge: District Judge Nicholas Garaufis
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: 21-CV-1401

Fiduciary Duty Breach Claim Dismissed as Redundant to Malpractice Claim Against Attorney

Metra Indus. Inc. v. Rockland Cnty.
Publication Date: 2018-10-04
Practice Area: Contractual Disputes
Industry: Construction | State and Local Government
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, U.S. - SDNY
Judge: District Judge Kenneth Karas
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Counsel for Plaintiff: Lewis J. Baker, Esq., C. William Groscup, , Watt Tieder Hoffar & Fitzgerald LLP, McLean, VA.
For defendant: Counsel for Plaintiff: Peter M. Kutil, Esq., King & King LLP, Long Island City, NY. ; Counsel for Defendant: Matthew G. Parisi, Esq., Bleakley Platt & Schmidt LLP, White Plains, NY.; Counsel for Defendant: Thomas E. Humbach, Esq., County of Rockland Department of Law, New City, NY.
Case number: 17-3537

Breach Suit for $300,816 'Retainage' Denied Judgment; Issues of Contract Compliance Exist

Gwathmey Siegel Kaufman & Associates Architects, LLC, f/k/a/ Gwathmey Siegel & Associates Architects, LLC, Plaintiff v. Mitchell Rales, Defendant, 12 Civ. 1983
Publication Date: 2012-06-21
Practice Area: Alternative Dispute Resolution
Industry:
Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District
Judge: District Judge Shira Scheindlin
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: For Plaintiff: Kevin Jude O'Neill, Esq., Gogick, Byrne & O'Neil, LLP, New York, NY. For Plaintiff: Albert Wesley McKee, Esq., Gogick, Byrne & O'Neill, LLP, New York, NY. For Plaintiff: James F Lee, Esq., Lee & McShane, P.C., Washington, DC.
For defendant: For Defendant: Alexander Nicholas Lamme, Esq., Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, LLP, McLean, Virginia.
Case number: 12 Civ. 1983

Cite as: Gwathmey Siegel Kaufman & Associates Architects, LLC v. Rales, 12 Civ. 1983, NYLJ 1202560038501, at *1 (SDNY, Decided June 15, 2012)District

The H.N. and Frances C. Berger Foundation v. Perez
Publication Date: 2013-07-24
Practice Area: real estate
Industry:
Court: C.A. 4th
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Barton, Klugman & Oetting, and Ronald R. St. John, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, Robert C. Niesley, Donna R. Tobar, and Christopher M. Bunge, for Defendants and Respondents.
Case number: No. E054948

Cite as 13 C.D.O.S. 7821 THE H.N. AND FRANCES C. BERGER FOUNDATION, Plaintiff and Appellant

Dillingham-Ray Wilson v. City of Los Angeles (CBI Services, Inc.)
Publication Date: 2010-03-19
Practice Area: Government
Industry:
Court: C.A. 2nd
Judge:
Attorneys:
For plaintiff: Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, Gregory J. Dukellis, Jared M. Wayne; Monteleone & McCrory, Patrick J. Duffy III and Andrew W. Hawthorne for Plaintiff and Appellant.
For defendant: Rockard J. Delgadillo, City Attorney, Michael L. Claessens, Assistant City Attorney; Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Irving H. Greines, Feris M. Greenberger, Peter O. Israel; Akermann Senterfitt, Nowland C. Hong, Thomas J. Casamassima and Michael S. Simon for Defendant and Respondent. Dennis J. Herrera, City Attorney, Danny Chou, Chief of Complex and Special Litigation, and Kathleen Morris, Deputy City Attorney for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, Timothy L. Pierce and Hector H. Espinosa for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
Case number: No. B192900

Cite as 10 C.D.O.S. 3481DILLINGHAM-RAY WILSON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v.CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant

Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand Oaks
Publication Date: 2002-02-05
Practice Area: contracts
Industry:
Court: Cal.Sup.Ct.
Judge: BROWN, J.
Attorneys:
For plaintiff:
For defendant:
Case number: No. S091069

The full case caption appears at the end of this opinion. In this case we determine whether the abandonment theory of liability applies against a public agency, and whether p

More from ALM

More from ALM

Legal Speak is a weekly podcast that makes sense of what’s happening in the legal industry.

Resources