0 results for 'Wilenchik & Bartness A Professional Corporation'
How Not to Write a Brief: Appeals Court Calls Out Arizona Republican Party's 'Muddled Presentation'
"First, rather than summarizing the relevant facts and procedural history in the 'statement of facts' section of its opening brief, ARP includes numerous reasons it believes the court's rulings were improper," Judge Michael J. Brown wrote for the court. "This tactic violates our appellate rules and needlessly injects uncertainty into the briefing process by leaving opposing counsel and this court to sort through a muddled presentation to discern what arguments have been fairly presented."
Arizona Appellate Court Rejects Cyber Ninja's Efforts to Keep Election Records Sealed
Cyber Ninjas Inc. sought relief from Superior Court Judge John Hannah's order that it turn over copies of public records that it possessed.
Lacey v. Maricopa County
Publication Date: 2012-08-29 Practice Area: Civil Rights
Industry: Court: 9th Cir. Judge: Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Before: Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge, Mary M. Schroeder, Harry Pregerson, Stephen Reinhardt, William A. Fletcher, Raymond C. Fisher, Richard C. Tallman, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Jay S. Bybee, Carlos T. Bea, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges. Attorneys: For plaintiff: John T. White, Stinson Morrison Hecker LLP, Phoenix, Arizona; Michael J. Meehan (argued), Law Office of Michael Meehan, Tucson, Arizona, for the appellants. For defendant: Eileen Dennis Gilbride (argued), Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., Phoenix, Arizona, for appellees Joseph Arpaio and Ava Arpaio.
Timothy J. Casey (argued), Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod, P.C., Phoenix, Arizona, for appellees Andrew Thomas, the Maricopa County Attorney's Office, and Maricopa County.
Laura A. Freeman, Zwillinger Greek Zwillinger & Knecht PC, Phoenix, Arizona; Timothy J. Casey, Schmitt, Schneck, Smyth & Herrod, P.C., Phoenix, Arizona, for appellees-cross-appellants Dennis Wilenchik and Becky Bartness. Case number: No. 09-15703 No. 09-15806
Cite as 12 C.D.O.S. 9909 MICHAEL LACEY; JIM LARKIN; PHOENIX NEW TIMES, LLC, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MAR
Trending Stories
- 1Where Do Law Grads Get the Most Bang for Their Buck?
- 2Kirkland Merges Finance Practices Ahead of New Star Hire, as Private Credit Market Booms
- 3Biden Will Be First Lawyer-President Without a JD From the 'T-14' in a Century
- 4AI/IP Issues Part 2: What Current Litigation Can Tell Us About Where IP in AI Is Heading
- 5Recognizing Presidential Immunity, Divided High Court Sends Trump Case Back to Trial Court
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
More from ALM
- Morgan & Morgan Class Action Attorneys Detail Pathway to Success Within Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Practice 1 minute read
- Holwell Shuster & Goldberg Partners Leverage 'Hostile' Witnesses to Secure $101 Million Verdict Against Walmart 1 minute read
- Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference Midwest 2024: Mike Andolina, Partner, White & Case 1 minute read
Resources
Employee Happiness Playbook: The 3 R's for Business Success in 2024
Brought to you by Amazing Workplace, Inc.
Download Now
The Positive Impact of AI at Small Law Firms: 4 Key Insights
Brought to you by LexisNexis®
Download Now
Will Generative AIs Transform Legal Services? Defensibility and Security Must Be a Focus
Brought to you by HaystackID
Download Now
Unlocking the Power of Early Case Assessment Workflows
Brought to you by Integreon
Download Now